通过辅助生殖技术受孕:围产期预后不良的独立危险因素

{"title":"通过辅助生殖技术受孕:围产期预后不良的独立危险因素","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a\nconsequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to\nfollow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326\nspontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them\nantenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes\nmellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and\nmortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for\ngestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean\nsection (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower\nApgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs\n5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth,\nappropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are\nessential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conception via Assisted Reproductive Techniques: an Independent Risk Factor for\\nPoor Perinatal Outcome\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a\\nconsequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to\\nfollow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326\\nspontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them\\nantenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes\\nmellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and\\nmortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for\\ngestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean\\nsection (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower\\nApgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs\\n5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth,\\nappropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are\\nessential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助生殖技术(ART)是为低生育能力夫妇提供的成熟的治疗方法。因此,越来越多的产科医生不得不在没有任何正式指导的情况下管理高危妊娠。我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,利用11875名妇女(11326名自然怀孕,549名使用ART)的数据来评估ART的风险,以便提出更好地管理这些风险的政策。结局指标包括引产、分娩方式和妊娠、妊娠期糖尿病和胎龄小、肛门括约肌损伤、产后出血和新生儿发病率和死亡率。ART组妊娠期糖尿病发生率较高(18.9% vs 9.4%, P 1500mL) (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001)。ART组apgar评分较低(2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03)和进新生儿病房的可能性更大(10.2% vs5.4%, P<0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,在管理高危ART妊娠时,产前监测妊娠糖尿病和胎儿生长,适当的分娩方式和时间咨询以及积极管理第三阶段分娩是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conception via Assisted Reproductive Techniques: an Independent Risk Factor for Poor Perinatal Outcome
Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a consequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to follow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326 spontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them antenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for gestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean section (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower Apgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs 5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth, appropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are essential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delayed Presentation of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome; A Rare Congenital Anomaly: A Case Report and literature Review Prevalence and Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Burundi: Evidence from 2016-17 Demographic and Health Survey Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Recognizing Infected Patients with Organ Dysfunction & Prediction of Mortality: Cohort Study Prenatal Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Fetal Cardiac Tumors Association of Pharmacy Services with Patient Satisfaction in Public and Private Tertiary Care Hospitals of Rawalpindi And Islamabad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1