阅读与写作课堂教师话语的观念意义

S. Mulatsih, Mursid Saleh, W. Warsono, I. Yuliasri
{"title":"阅读与写作课堂教师话语的观念意义","authors":"S. Mulatsih, Mursid Saleh, W. Warsono, I. Yuliasri","doi":"10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I3.5689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is aimed at describing the ideational meanings of teachers’ utterances  in Reading and Writing classes. It reveals what processes, participants and circumstances are found in the teachers’ utterances. The data were taken from the Reading and Writing classes conducted at a university in Semarang city. The data were collected by video recording the teaching and learning processes in Reading and Writing classes, then they were analyzed by segmenting the utterances into clauses; identifying the process, participants, and circumstances; classifying the processes, participants and circumstances based on their type; and interpreting the data. The results showed that the processes mostly found in the teachers’ utterances in  Reading class are relational ones  with carrier and attribute as participants, the second are mental processes with senser and phenomenon as the participants,   while in those of Writing class are material with actor and goal as participants and the second are  relational with carrier and attribute as participants. Relational processes are dominant in Reading class because the teacher explained many terms or vocabularies found in the text to make the students really understand them. That material processes are dominant in Writing class is caused by the fact that in Writing class the teacher often asks the students to do some actions like writing or doing something.","PeriodicalId":33478,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideational Meanings of Teachers' Utterances in Reading and Writing Classes\",\"authors\":\"S. Mulatsih, Mursid Saleh, W. Warsono, I. Yuliasri\",\"doi\":\"10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I3.5689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is aimed at describing the ideational meanings of teachers’ utterances  in Reading and Writing classes. It reveals what processes, participants and circumstances are found in the teachers’ utterances. The data were taken from the Reading and Writing classes conducted at a university in Semarang city. The data were collected by video recording the teaching and learning processes in Reading and Writing classes, then they were analyzed by segmenting the utterances into clauses; identifying the process, participants, and circumstances; classifying the processes, participants and circumstances based on their type; and interpreting the data. The results showed that the processes mostly found in the teachers’ utterances in  Reading class are relational ones  with carrier and attribute as participants, the second are mental processes with senser and phenomenon as the participants,   while in those of Writing class are material with actor and goal as participants and the second are  relational with carrier and attribute as participants. Relational processes are dominant in Reading class because the teacher explained many terms or vocabularies found in the text to make the students really understand them. That material processes are dominant in Writing class is caused by the fact that in Writing class the teacher often asks the students to do some actions like writing or doing something.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I3.5689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/IJOLTE.V2I3.5689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在描述教师在阅读与写作课堂上话语的概念意义。它揭示了教师话语中的过程、参与者和环境。数据来自三宝垄市一所大学的阅读和写作课程。本研究采用录像的方式记录学生在读写课上的教与学过程,然后将学生的话语分段成小句进行分析;识别过程、参与者和环境;根据类型对过程、参与者和环境进行分类;并解释数据。结果表明:阅读课教师话语的主要过程是以载体和属性为参与者的关系过程,其次是以感官和现象为参与者的心理过程,写作课教师话语的主要过程是以行动者和目标为参与者的物质过程,其次是以载体和属性为参与者的关系过程。关系过程在阅读课上占主导地位,因为教师解释了许多在课文中发现的术语或词汇,使学生真正理解它们。材料过程在写作课中占据主导地位是由于在写作课上,老师经常要求学生做一些动作,比如写作或做一些事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ideational Meanings of Teachers' Utterances in Reading and Writing Classes
This study is aimed at describing the ideational meanings of teachers’ utterances  in Reading and Writing classes. It reveals what processes, participants and circumstances are found in the teachers’ utterances. The data were taken from the Reading and Writing classes conducted at a university in Semarang city. The data were collected by video recording the teaching and learning processes in Reading and Writing classes, then they were analyzed by segmenting the utterances into clauses; identifying the process, participants, and circumstances; classifying the processes, participants and circumstances based on their type; and interpreting the data. The results showed that the processes mostly found in the teachers’ utterances in  Reading class are relational ones  with carrier and attribute as participants, the second are mental processes with senser and phenomenon as the participants,   while in those of Writing class are material with actor and goal as participants and the second are  relational with carrier and attribute as participants. Relational processes are dominant in Reading class because the teacher explained many terms or vocabularies found in the text to make the students really understand them. That material processes are dominant in Writing class is caused by the fact that in Writing class the teacher often asks the students to do some actions like writing or doing something.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
An investigation into implementing out-of-class English support in one Japanese University. Analysis of the process of small-scale public procurement in the education sector in the Czech Republic Research Results of Time Management Teaching Methods at the Undergraduate Level at TSU First-year University Students’ Experiences in Learning Threshold Concepts of Acids-Bases Chemistry The issue of pedagogical and teaching training of teachers in Greek education and the role of university professors: an educational policy approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1