文献计量学:概述

J. M. Berger, Christine M. Baker
{"title":"文献计量学:概述","authors":"J. M. Berger, Christine M. Baker","doi":"10.5530/RJPS.2014.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide an overview of the field of bibliometrics, the quantitative analysis of publications, especially as it relates to science and medicine. Bibliometrics involves the analysis of citations, which can aid in measuring the impact of an article on a particular field of study; and of criteria related to assessing a journal’s importance within the field. While bibliometrics has many applications, its use in evaluating researchers has generated the most controversy. We explain and compare many of the standard metrics and the tools for generating them, and provide rankings for key Indian journals. Additionally, we discuss perceptions of metrics by supporters and detractors, some proposed alternatives, and the possible impact of technology and publishing trends on the future of bibliometrics.","PeriodicalId":21459,"journal":{"name":"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometrics: An Overview\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Berger, Christine M. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/RJPS.2014.3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide an overview of the field of bibliometrics, the quantitative analysis of publications, especially as it relates to science and medicine. Bibliometrics involves the analysis of citations, which can aid in measuring the impact of an article on a particular field of study; and of criteria related to assessing a journal’s importance within the field. While bibliometrics has many applications, its use in evaluating researchers has generated the most controversy. We explain and compare many of the standard metrics and the tools for generating them, and provide rankings for key Indian journals. Additionally, we discuss perceptions of metrics by supporters and detractors, some proposed alternatives, and the possible impact of technology and publishing trends on the future of bibliometrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"81-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/RJPS.2014.3.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/RJPS.2014.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们提供文献计量学领域的概述,出版物的定量分析,特别是与科学和医学相关的。文献计量学涉及对引文的分析,这有助于衡量一篇文章对特定研究领域的影响;以及评估期刊在该领域重要性的相关标准。虽然文献计量学有许多应用,但它在评估研究人员方面的使用引起了最大的争议。我们解释和比较了许多标准指标和生成这些指标的工具,并为主要的印度期刊提供了排名。此外,我们还讨论了支持者和反对者对计量学的看法,一些建议的替代方案,以及技术和出版趋势对文献计量学未来的可能影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bibliometrics: An Overview
We provide an overview of the field of bibliometrics, the quantitative analysis of publications, especially as it relates to science and medicine. Bibliometrics involves the analysis of citations, which can aid in measuring the impact of an article on a particular field of study; and of criteria related to assessing a journal’s importance within the field. While bibliometrics has many applications, its use in evaluating researchers has generated the most controversy. We explain and compare many of the standard metrics and the tools for generating them, and provide rankings for key Indian journals. Additionally, we discuss perceptions of metrics by supporters and detractors, some proposed alternatives, and the possible impact of technology and publishing trends on the future of bibliometrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances of Niosomes as a Targeted Drug Delivery Syste Development of Dendrimer-5-Flurouracil and Folic acid Conjugation for the Treatment of Colon Cancer via Target Drug Delivery Neuroprotective Metabolites from Endophytic Microbes: A Review A Case Study on Tubercular Cavernous Sinus Syndrome Development and Evaluation of Floating Bilayer Tablet Containing Combination of Oxethazine and Cefixime Trihydrate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1