维多利亚时期教师对学生行为的信念及其参与准备和信心的感知以及参与循证行为支持的准备和信心的感知研究

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Journal of Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14221/ajte.2022v47n1.2
R. Fox, U. Sharma, Erin S. Leif
{"title":"维多利亚时期教师对学生行为的信念及其参与准备和信心的感知以及参与循证行为支持的准备和信心的感知研究","authors":"R. Fox, U. Sharma, Erin S. Leif","doi":"10.14221/ajte.2022v47n1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive and proactive approaches to behaviour support have been recognised as one component required to create effective and inclusive school environments (Finkelstein et al., 2019). States and territories within Australia have increasingly adopted school- wide positive behavioural interventions and supports (SWPBIS) as a means to creating effective social and behavioural change (Poed & Whitefield, 2020). However, ensuring staff implement SWPBIS as it is intended has been a challenge, both in Australia and internationally (McIntosh et al., 2016; NSW Ombudsman, 2017). The current study identifies and seeks to address two gaps in the existing literature exploring noted barriers to the successful and sustained implementation of SWPBIS. First, limited exploration of teachers’ perceptions of their preparation (pre-service and in-service) and confidence to engage in SWPBIS practices and supports has been undertaken in Australia. Additionally, the degree to which teachers agree with a functional approach to understanding and supporting student behaviour has not been undertaken in an Australian context. The findings from such exploration may be used to inform the development of teacher training programs, and support efforts to successfully and sustainably implement SWPBIS in Australian schools.","PeriodicalId":47550,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Victorian Teachers’ Beliefs About Student Behaviour and Their Perception of Preparation and Confidence to Engage inand Their Perception of Preparation and Confidence to Engage in Evidence-based Behaviour SupportEvidence-based Behaviour Support\",\"authors\":\"R. Fox, U. Sharma, Erin S. Leif\",\"doi\":\"10.14221/ajte.2022v47n1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Positive and proactive approaches to behaviour support have been recognised as one component required to create effective and inclusive school environments (Finkelstein et al., 2019). States and territories within Australia have increasingly adopted school- wide positive behavioural interventions and supports (SWPBIS) as a means to creating effective social and behavioural change (Poed & Whitefield, 2020). However, ensuring staff implement SWPBIS as it is intended has been a challenge, both in Australia and internationally (McIntosh et al., 2016; NSW Ombudsman, 2017). The current study identifies and seeks to address two gaps in the existing literature exploring noted barriers to the successful and sustained implementation of SWPBIS. First, limited exploration of teachers’ perceptions of their preparation (pre-service and in-service) and confidence to engage in SWPBIS practices and supports has been undertaken in Australia. Additionally, the degree to which teachers agree with a functional approach to understanding and supporting student behaviour has not been undertaken in an Australian context. The findings from such exploration may be used to inform the development of teacher training programs, and support efforts to successfully and sustainably implement SWPBIS in Australian schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

积极主动的行为支持方法已被认为是创造有效和包容的学校环境所需的一个组成部分(Finkelstein等人,2019)。澳大利亚各州和地区越来越多地采用全校范围内的积极行为干预和支持(SWPBIS)作为创造有效的社会和行为改变的手段(Poed & Whitefield, 2020)。然而,无论在澳大利亚还是在国际上,确保员工按照预期实施SWPBIS都是一项挑战(McIntosh等人,2016;新南威尔士州申诉专员,2017)。目前的研究确定并试图解决现有文献中存在的两个空白,这些文献探讨了成功和持续实施SWPBIS的明显障碍。首先,澳大利亚对教师对他们的准备(职前和在职)和参与SWPBIS实践和支持的信心的看法进行了有限的探索。此外,教师对理解和支持学生行为的功能性方法的认同程度还没有在澳大利亚的背景下进行。这些探索的结果可以用来为教师培训计划的发展提供信息,并支持在澳大利亚学校成功和可持续地实施SWPBIS的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study of Victorian Teachers’ Beliefs About Student Behaviour and Their Perception of Preparation and Confidence to Engage inand Their Perception of Preparation and Confidence to Engage in Evidence-based Behaviour SupportEvidence-based Behaviour Support
Positive and proactive approaches to behaviour support have been recognised as one component required to create effective and inclusive school environments (Finkelstein et al., 2019). States and territories within Australia have increasingly adopted school- wide positive behavioural interventions and supports (SWPBIS) as a means to creating effective social and behavioural change (Poed & Whitefield, 2020). However, ensuring staff implement SWPBIS as it is intended has been a challenge, both in Australia and internationally (McIntosh et al., 2016; NSW Ombudsman, 2017). The current study identifies and seeks to address two gaps in the existing literature exploring noted barriers to the successful and sustained implementation of SWPBIS. First, limited exploration of teachers’ perceptions of their preparation (pre-service and in-service) and confidence to engage in SWPBIS practices and supports has been undertaken in Australia. Additionally, the degree to which teachers agree with a functional approach to understanding and supporting student behaviour has not been undertaken in an Australian context. The findings from such exploration may be used to inform the development of teacher training programs, and support efforts to successfully and sustainably implement SWPBIS in Australian schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Teacher Education
Australian Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Australian Journal of Teacher Education is to enhance the quality of teacher education through the publication of research reports, learned points of view and commentaries. Contributions may address proposals for, or descriptions of, development in the purpose, structure and methodology of teacher education; curriculum issues; changes in schools; or general social, ideological or political issues relating to teacher education. Papers must make an explicit connection with teacher education. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, which is blind peer reviewed by a minimum of two members of the Editorial panel, is access free, electronic and published by Edith Cowan University. The Journal is indexed by the Australian Education Index and ERIC. It was rated ‘A’ by Australian Research Council in 2010 (www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list/htm ) and is ranked .496 on SCImago. It is pleased to offer authors an efficient publication service. Manuscripts that have been through the review and revision cycle and have been accepted for publication will typically be published within two months. The time to first review can take up to six months, due to the large number of papers being submitted for review. Intending authors should be aware that the Journal has a rejection rate in excess of 50%.
期刊最新文献
Iraqi Kurdish Pre-service Teachers and Teacher Educators’ Perceptions on Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Professional Identity Development "Sky-High Motivation": Intradisciplinary Integrative- Courses for Excelling Teachers' Training Experiential Learning Projects as Assessment in Initial Teacher Education Nature of Science: Examining Science Teachers’ Knowledge and their Instructional Practices Building Research Capacity of Future Teachers: A Canadian Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1