乙氧基化胺表面活性剂在高盐度条件下对co2 -泡沫稳定性的评价

L. Le, R. Ramanathan, H. Nasr-El-Din
{"title":"乙氧基化胺表面活性剂在高盐度条件下对co2 -泡沫稳定性的评价","authors":"L. Le, R. Ramanathan, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/197515-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n CO2 flooding is well-known to be an effective EOR method and has been successfully implemented around the world. In heterogeneous formations, CO2 foam has been utilized to achieve conformance and mobility control. However, the foam performance degrades significantly at high saline environments. Ethoxylated amines have been reported to be successful in high pressure-high temperature (HPHT) conditions. This paper investigates the results obtained from a study of the foamability and foam stability at varying salinities, initial pH, and surfactant concentration.\n The surfactant is evaluated to provide optimum concentration, salinity, and a pH level for better foam performance during EOR applications. Bottle shake tests achieved the objectives of this paper. Different salinities of brine, ranging from 0 to 25 wt%, mixed with the surfactant, with concentrations of 0.1 to 1 wt%, helped in the investigation of the foam performance. The bottle shake tests were conducted to prescreen the surfactant concentration, salinity, and pH level, at ambient conditions. Sodium chloride was used to prepare the solutions.\n The bottle shake tests indicated that, in terms of foam half-life, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.25 wt% for salinities of 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. Moreover, at this salinity range, the lowering of the surfactant solution's pH had a detrimental effect on the foam stability. The faster collapse of the foam at lower pH could be attributed to the repulsive interactions between the amine headgroups. The optimum initial pH was between 6 and 6.5 for salinity between 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. However, for higher salinity environment, 15 to 25 wt% NaCl, foam stability at low pH shows drastic improvement over its counterpart at lower salinities. At these high salinities, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.50 wt%.\n The application of the ethoxylated amine surfactant at different salinity levels has not been studied in detail. The application of this surfactant needs to be evaluated for optimum concentration, pH, and salinity. The effect of the surfactant's initial pH on the foamability and foam half-life has not been investigated. This paper addresses these gaps in literature and provides an optimized composition that can be applied for EOR operations.","PeriodicalId":11091,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Ethoxylated Amine Surfactant for CO2-Foam Stability at High Salinity Conditions\",\"authors\":\"L. Le, R. Ramanathan, H. Nasr-El-Din\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197515-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n CO2 flooding is well-known to be an effective EOR method and has been successfully implemented around the world. In heterogeneous formations, CO2 foam has been utilized to achieve conformance and mobility control. However, the foam performance degrades significantly at high saline environments. Ethoxylated amines have been reported to be successful in high pressure-high temperature (HPHT) conditions. This paper investigates the results obtained from a study of the foamability and foam stability at varying salinities, initial pH, and surfactant concentration.\\n The surfactant is evaluated to provide optimum concentration, salinity, and a pH level for better foam performance during EOR applications. Bottle shake tests achieved the objectives of this paper. Different salinities of brine, ranging from 0 to 25 wt%, mixed with the surfactant, with concentrations of 0.1 to 1 wt%, helped in the investigation of the foam performance. The bottle shake tests were conducted to prescreen the surfactant concentration, salinity, and pH level, at ambient conditions. Sodium chloride was used to prepare the solutions.\\n The bottle shake tests indicated that, in terms of foam half-life, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.25 wt% for salinities of 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. Moreover, at this salinity range, the lowering of the surfactant solution's pH had a detrimental effect on the foam stability. The faster collapse of the foam at lower pH could be attributed to the repulsive interactions between the amine headgroups. The optimum initial pH was between 6 and 6.5 for salinity between 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. However, for higher salinity environment, 15 to 25 wt% NaCl, foam stability at low pH shows drastic improvement over its counterpart at lower salinities. At these high salinities, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.50 wt%.\\n The application of the ethoxylated amine surfactant at different salinity levels has not been studied in detail. The application of this surfactant needs to be evaluated for optimum concentration, pH, and salinity. The effect of the surfactant's initial pH on the foamability and foam half-life has not been investigated. This paper addresses these gaps in literature and provides an optimized composition that can be applied for EOR operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197515-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 13, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197515-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

众所周知,二氧化碳驱是一种有效的提高采收率方法,并已在世界各地成功实施。在非均质地层中,CO2泡沫被用来实现一致性和流动性控制。然而,泡沫性能在高盐环境下显著下降。据报道,乙氧基化胺在高压-高温(HPHT)条件下是成功的。本文考察了在不同盐度、初始pH值和表面活性剂浓度下泡沫性和泡沫稳定性的研究结果。对表面活性剂进行评估,以提供最佳的浓度、盐度和pH值,从而在EOR应用中获得更好的泡沫性能。摇瓶试验达到了本文的目的。不同盐度的卤水(从0 wt%到25 wt%)与表面活性剂混合,浓度为0.1 wt%到1 wt%,有助于研究泡沫性能。在环境条件下,进行摇瓶试验以预筛选表面活性剂浓度、盐度和pH值。溶液采用氯化钠配制。摇瓶试验表明,在盐浓度为0 ~ 15 wt% NaCl的条件下,表面活性剂的最佳浓度为0.25 wt%。此外,在此盐度范围内,表面活性剂溶液pH值的降低对泡沫稳定性有不利影响。在较低的pH下,泡沫的快速崩溃可归因于胺头基之间的排斥相互作用。当盐浓度为0 ~ 15 wt% NaCl时,最佳初始pH值为6 ~ 6.5。然而,对于高盐度环境,15 ~ 25 wt% NaCl,泡沫在低pH值下的稳定性比在低盐度下的稳定性有显著改善。在这些高盐度条件下,表面活性剂的最佳浓度为0.50 wt%。乙氧基化胺表面活性剂在不同盐度条件下的应用还没有详细的研究。需要评估这种表面活性剂的最佳浓度、pH值和盐度。表面活性剂的初始pH值对泡沫性和泡沫半衰期的影响尚未研究。本文解决了这些文献上的空白,并提供了一种可应用于EOR操作的优化组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of an Ethoxylated Amine Surfactant for CO2-Foam Stability at High Salinity Conditions
CO2 flooding is well-known to be an effective EOR method and has been successfully implemented around the world. In heterogeneous formations, CO2 foam has been utilized to achieve conformance and mobility control. However, the foam performance degrades significantly at high saline environments. Ethoxylated amines have been reported to be successful in high pressure-high temperature (HPHT) conditions. This paper investigates the results obtained from a study of the foamability and foam stability at varying salinities, initial pH, and surfactant concentration. The surfactant is evaluated to provide optimum concentration, salinity, and a pH level for better foam performance during EOR applications. Bottle shake tests achieved the objectives of this paper. Different salinities of brine, ranging from 0 to 25 wt%, mixed with the surfactant, with concentrations of 0.1 to 1 wt%, helped in the investigation of the foam performance. The bottle shake tests were conducted to prescreen the surfactant concentration, salinity, and pH level, at ambient conditions. Sodium chloride was used to prepare the solutions. The bottle shake tests indicated that, in terms of foam half-life, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.25 wt% for salinities of 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. Moreover, at this salinity range, the lowering of the surfactant solution's pH had a detrimental effect on the foam stability. The faster collapse of the foam at lower pH could be attributed to the repulsive interactions between the amine headgroups. The optimum initial pH was between 6 and 6.5 for salinity between 0 to 15 wt% NaCl. However, for higher salinity environment, 15 to 25 wt% NaCl, foam stability at low pH shows drastic improvement over its counterpart at lower salinities. At these high salinities, the optimal surfactant concentration was 0.50 wt%. The application of the ethoxylated amine surfactant at different salinity levels has not been studied in detail. The application of this surfactant needs to be evaluated for optimum concentration, pH, and salinity. The effect of the surfactant's initial pH on the foamability and foam half-life has not been investigated. This paper addresses these gaps in literature and provides an optimized composition that can be applied for EOR operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Produced Water with Back Produced ASP Using Analytics to Assess Health Status of DLE Combustion Gas Turbines Design of Economical Polymer and Surfactant-Polymer Processes in High Temperature Carbonated Um Gudair Kuwaiti Field. Enhancement of Routine Data Acquisition in a Giant Offshore Brownfield by Bridging Gaps Identified Through Comprehensive Data Analysis Applying Brain Science to Achieve Organizational Success
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1