交互式皮肤审美偏好的情感意义预测研究

Shih-Miao Huang
{"title":"交互式皮肤审美偏好的情感意义预测研究","authors":"Shih-Miao Huang","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to explore the affective qualities which influence subjects' aesthetic preferences. Forty-six subjects assessed sixteen skins on an aesthetic preference scale and eleven affective meaning scales. The aesthetic preference was regarded as a dependent variable; the eleven affective meanings were independent variables. The Stepwise Regression Analysis was performed. The result showed that six affective meanings: “exquisite”, “original”, “strong”, “childlike”, “intense” and “pure” entered the model. Besides, “exquisite”, was the most important affective quality in judgment of aesthetic preferences. It implied that designers had to create the interactive interfaces with an “exquisite” affective quality to please users' aesthetic affects. Furthermore, the other five affective meanings which were not selected into the model were called LoSPA affective meanings. It indicated that subjects had different aesthetic preference levels for skins evoking the affective meaning in LoSPA. It implied that a specific user group would prefer the skins evoking the affective meaning.","PeriodicalId":6454,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"781-785"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of affective meanings predicting aesthetic preferences of interactive skins\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Miao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was to explore the affective qualities which influence subjects' aesthetic preferences. Forty-six subjects assessed sixteen skins on an aesthetic preference scale and eleven affective meaning scales. The aesthetic preference was regarded as a dependent variable; the eleven affective meanings were independent variables. The Stepwise Regression Analysis was performed. The result showed that six affective meanings: “exquisite”, “original”, “strong”, “childlike”, “intense” and “pure” entered the model. Besides, “exquisite”, was the most important affective quality in judgment of aesthetic preferences. It implied that designers had to create the interactive interfaces with an “exquisite” affective quality to please users' aesthetic affects. Furthermore, the other five affective meanings which were not selected into the model were called LoSPA affective meanings. It indicated that subjects had different aesthetic preference levels for skins evoking the affective meaning in LoSPA. It implied that a specific user group would prefer the skins evoking the affective meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"781-785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在探讨影响被试审美偏好的情感品质。46名受试者在审美偏好量表和11种情感意义量表上评估了16种皮肤。审美偏好被视为一个因变量;11种情感意义为自变量。采用逐步回归分析。结果显示,“精致”、“原创”、“强烈”、“童稚”、“强烈”和“纯粹”六个情感含义进入了模型。此外,“精致”是审美偏好判断中最重要的情感品质。这意味着设计师必须创造出具有“精致”情感品质的交互界面,以满足用户的审美感受。另外,未入选模型的5个情感意义称为LoSPA情感意义。实验结果表明,被试对皮肤的审美偏好程度存在差异。这意味着特定的用户组更喜欢能够唤起情感含义的皮肤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of affective meanings predicting aesthetic preferences of interactive skins
This study was to explore the affective qualities which influence subjects' aesthetic preferences. Forty-six subjects assessed sixteen skins on an aesthetic preference scale and eleven affective meaning scales. The aesthetic preference was regarded as a dependent variable; the eleven affective meanings were independent variables. The Stepwise Regression Analysis was performed. The result showed that six affective meanings: “exquisite”, “original”, “strong”, “childlike”, “intense” and “pure” entered the model. Besides, “exquisite”, was the most important affective quality in judgment of aesthetic preferences. It implied that designers had to create the interactive interfaces with an “exquisite” affective quality to please users' aesthetic affects. Furthermore, the other five affective meanings which were not selected into the model were called LoSPA affective meanings. It indicated that subjects had different aesthetic preference levels for skins evoking the affective meaning in LoSPA. It implied that a specific user group would prefer the skins evoking the affective meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extension of the PROMETHEE Method to the Multicriteria Dual Clustering Problem On the Necessity for Improving Effectiveness of Qualification Process for Spare Parts Additive Manufacturing in a Circular Economy Supply Chain Selecting Temporary Flood Shelter Locations by P-Center Model A Feasible Schema Design Strategy for Amazon DynamoDB: A Nested Normal Form Approach Flood Shelters Location Using P-median Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1