基于DELPHI法的图书馆服务平台特征分类及重要性排序

D. Kouis, G. Agiorgitis
{"title":"基于DELPHI法的图书馆服务平台特征分类及重要性排序","authors":"D. Kouis, G. Agiorgitis","doi":"10.1080/10572317.2020.1840001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this research is to identify the innovative features of the LSPs that differentiate them from the LMS, as well as to evaluate their importance, based on the opinions of the Greek information scientists. The method used is the Delphi 2-round questionnaire. The results show that the experts most value an all-in-one system that incorporates all modules within it, instead of different collaborating software. Interoperability between systems, the adoption of new metadata standards, the SaaS architecture and the multi-tenant model are also held in high regard. In contrast, the use of the mobile library applications feature has achieved low ranking.","PeriodicalId":39917,"journal":{"name":"International Information and Library Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"291 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Library Service Platforms (LSPs) Characteristics Classification and Importance Ranking through DELPHI Method Application\",\"authors\":\"D. Kouis, G. Agiorgitis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10572317.2020.1840001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this research is to identify the innovative features of the LSPs that differentiate them from the LMS, as well as to evaluate their importance, based on the opinions of the Greek information scientists. The method used is the Delphi 2-round questionnaire. The results show that the experts most value an all-in-one system that incorporates all modules within it, instead of different collaborating software. Interoperability between systems, the adoption of new metadata standards, the SaaS architecture and the multi-tenant model are also held in high regard. In contrast, the use of the mobile library applications feature has achieved low ranking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Information and Library Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Information and Library Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1840001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Information and Library Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1840001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是根据希腊信息科学家的观点,确定lsp与LMS区别的创新特征,并评估其重要性。采用德尔菲二轮问卷法。结果表明,专家们最看重的是一个集成所有模块的一体化系统,而不是不同的协作软件。系统之间的互操作性、新元数据标准的采用、SaaS架构和多租户模型也受到高度重视。相比之下,使用移动图书馆应用功能的排名却很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Library Service Platforms (LSPs) Characteristics Classification and Importance Ranking through DELPHI Method Application
Abstract The purpose of this research is to identify the innovative features of the LSPs that differentiate them from the LMS, as well as to evaluate their importance, based on the opinions of the Greek information scientists. The method used is the Delphi 2-round questionnaire. The results show that the experts most value an all-in-one system that incorporates all modules within it, instead of different collaborating software. Interoperability between systems, the adoption of new metadata standards, the SaaS architecture and the multi-tenant model are also held in high regard. In contrast, the use of the mobile library applications feature has achieved low ranking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Information and Library Review
International Information and Library Review Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: For more than twenty years, the International Information and Library Review has been welcomed by information scientists, librarians and other scholars and practitioners all over the world for its timely articles on research and development in international and comparative librarianship, information sciences, information policy and information ethics, digital values and digital libraries. Contributions to the journal have come from staff or members of many different international organizations, including the United Nations, UNESCO, IFLA, and INTAMEL, and from library and information scientists in academia, government, industry, and other organizations.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Mentoring, Staff Motivation and Achievement of Organizational Set-Goals in Libraries of Public Tertiary Institutions in Lagos State, Nigeria I am Ukraine, We are Strong: Thoughts of a Librarian after a Year of the War Hidden Public Services Media and Information Literacy Self-Efficacy of LIS Students in Bangladesh Moving Libraries toward Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1