拯救动物:一条漫长的道德弧线

Lucille C. Thibodeau
{"title":"拯救动物:一条漫长的道德弧线","authors":"Lucille C. Thibodeau","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Saving Animals, a study of three different kinds of animal sanctuaries, is the first major ethnography to describe how sanctuaries \"unmake\" the notion of animals as property that reduces them to \"bare life.\" The study relies on numerous engaging narratives about rescue animals, their mutual interactions, and their interactions with the people who care for them—narratives that illustrate how the sentience and subjectivity of animals provide a firm ground for the author's ethical considerations. An animal sanctuary is ideally an intentional community of cocitizens whose pragmatic and symbolic value resides in its ability to lay the foundation for a broad challenge to all violent practices of exploitation \"targeted at a range of different others.\" The patient, incremental work of sanctuaries has implications not only for the future of human-animal relations but more broadly for the future of humans on the planet. The ultimate vision of sanctuaries is a world outside that mirrors the world inside, a pantopia where there will be no \"others,\" only \"us.\"","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"10 1","pages":"80 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saving Animals: A Long Moral Arc\",\"authors\":\"Lucille C. Thibodeau\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/21601267.13.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Saving Animals, a study of three different kinds of animal sanctuaries, is the first major ethnography to describe how sanctuaries \\\"unmake\\\" the notion of animals as property that reduces them to \\\"bare life.\\\" The study relies on numerous engaging narratives about rescue animals, their mutual interactions, and their interactions with the people who care for them—narratives that illustrate how the sentience and subjectivity of animals provide a firm ground for the author's ethical considerations. An animal sanctuary is ideally an intentional community of cocitizens whose pragmatic and symbolic value resides in its ability to lay the foundation for a broad challenge to all violent practices of exploitation \\\"targeted at a range of different others.\\\" The patient, incremental work of sanctuaries has implications not only for the future of human-animal relations but more broadly for the future of humans on the planet. The ultimate vision of sanctuaries is a world outside that mirrors the world inside, a pantopia where there will be no \\\"others,\\\" only \\\"us.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":73601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied animal ethics research\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied animal ethics research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:《拯救动物》研究了三种不同类型的动物保护区,是第一本描述保护区如何“消除”动物作为财产的概念的主要民族志,这种概念使动物沦为“赤裸的生命”。这项研究依赖于大量关于被救援动物的引人入胜的叙述,它们之间的相互作用,以及它们与照顾它们的人的互动——这些叙述说明了动物的感知和主观性如何为作者的伦理考虑提供了坚实的基础。理想的动物保护区是一个由共同公民组成的有意识的社区,它的实用主义和象征价值在于它能够为广泛挑战所有“针对不同群体”的暴力剥削行为奠定基础。庇护所耐心、渐进的工作不仅对人类与动物关系的未来有影响,而且对地球上人类的未来有更广泛的影响。避难所的终极愿景是一个反映内部世界的外部世界,一个没有“他人”,只有“我们”的泛色世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Saving Animals: A Long Moral Arc
Abstract:Saving Animals, a study of three different kinds of animal sanctuaries, is the first major ethnography to describe how sanctuaries "unmake" the notion of animals as property that reduces them to "bare life." The study relies on numerous engaging narratives about rescue animals, their mutual interactions, and their interactions with the people who care for them—narratives that illustrate how the sentience and subjectivity of animals provide a firm ground for the author's ethical considerations. An animal sanctuary is ideally an intentional community of cocitizens whose pragmatic and symbolic value resides in its ability to lay the foundation for a broad challenge to all violent practices of exploitation "targeted at a range of different others." The patient, incremental work of sanctuaries has implications not only for the future of human-animal relations but more broadly for the future of humans on the planet. The ultimate vision of sanctuaries is a world outside that mirrors the world inside, a pantopia where there will be no "others," only "us."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1