孟加拉西南沿海养殖罗氏沼虾(Macrobrachium rosenbergii)比较细菌学分析

S. Islam, M. A. Islam, M. Mannan, Mahadi Hasan Osman, Md. Shaheed Reza, Md. Naim Uddin, M. Rahman
{"title":"孟加拉西南沿海养殖罗氏沼虾(Macrobrachium rosenbergii)比较细菌学分析","authors":"S. Islam, M. A. Islam, M. Mannan, Mahadi Hasan Osman, Md. Shaheed Reza, Md. Naim Uddin, M. Rahman","doi":"10.4172/2155-9546.1000538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: With changing pattern of culture practices in the coastal region of Bangladesh, the euryhaline giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii has recently gained popularity among farmers of both semi-intensive and extensive culture systems to improve profitability. Since bacteria are the key player in aquaculture facilities governing health and quality of fish and prawn, comparative bacteriological analyses were undertaken to understand the suitable testing system of bacterial analysis for cultured freshwater prawn.Methodology: Both on-farm and laboratory conditions in low-resource settings were considered to monitor bacterial population in terms of bacterial count, gram staining and presence of enteric bacteria associated with prawn and its surrounding environment.Results: On-farm counting was about one log-unit lower total viable count in water, sediment and prawn samples compared to those of laboratory testing. The differences between on-farm and laboratory analysis probably occurred due to the time lapse during sample transportation. Study also showed that gram negative bacteria were dominant and enteric bacteria were present in both the prawn farms with more or less similar frequencies.Conclusion: It is concluded that the apparent difference in bacteriological condition of the two farms is possibly related to the differences in culture practices, environment and culture conditions and the study has recommended on-farm testing as an ideal bacteriological analysis method.","PeriodicalId":15243,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Bacteriological Analysis of Giant Freshwater Prawn ( Macrobrachium rosenbergii ) Cultured in South-Western Coastal Areas of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"S. Islam, M. A. Islam, M. Mannan, Mahadi Hasan Osman, Md. Shaheed Reza, Md. Naim Uddin, M. Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9546.1000538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective: With changing pattern of culture practices in the coastal region of Bangladesh, the euryhaline giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii has recently gained popularity among farmers of both semi-intensive and extensive culture systems to improve profitability. Since bacteria are the key player in aquaculture facilities governing health and quality of fish and prawn, comparative bacteriological analyses were undertaken to understand the suitable testing system of bacterial analysis for cultured freshwater prawn.Methodology: Both on-farm and laboratory conditions in low-resource settings were considered to monitor bacterial population in terms of bacterial count, gram staining and presence of enteric bacteria associated with prawn and its surrounding environment.Results: On-farm counting was about one log-unit lower total viable count in water, sediment and prawn samples compared to those of laboratory testing. The differences between on-farm and laboratory analysis probably occurred due to the time lapse during sample transportation. Study also showed that gram negative bacteria were dominant and enteric bacteria were present in both the prawn farms with more or less similar frequencies.Conclusion: It is concluded that the apparent difference in bacteriological condition of the two farms is possibly related to the differences in culture practices, environment and culture conditions and the study has recommended on-farm testing as an ideal bacteriological analysis method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的:随着孟加拉国沿海地区养殖方式的变化,罗氏沼虾(Macrobrachium rosenbergii)最近在半集约化和粗放化养殖系统的农民中受到欢迎,以提高盈利能力。由于细菌是水产养殖设施中控制鱼虾健康和质量的关键因素,因此进行了比较细菌学分析,以了解适合养殖淡水对虾的细菌分析测试系统。方法:考虑在低资源环境下的农场和实验室条件,以监测细菌数量、革兰氏染色和与对虾及其周围环境相关的肠道细菌的存在。结果:与实验室测试相比,养殖场计数在水、沉积物和对虾样品中总活菌数约低一个对数单位。农场和实验室分析之间的差异可能是由于样品运输过程中的时间延迟造成的。研究还表明,两个对虾养殖场均以革兰氏阴性菌为主,肠道菌的出现频率大体相似。结论:两个养殖场细菌学状况的明显差异可能与养殖方式、环境和养殖条件的差异有关,本研究推荐养殖场检测作为理想的细菌学分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Bacteriological Analysis of Giant Freshwater Prawn ( Macrobrachium rosenbergii ) Cultured in South-Western Coastal Areas of Bangladesh
Background and Objective: With changing pattern of culture practices in the coastal region of Bangladesh, the euryhaline giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii has recently gained popularity among farmers of both semi-intensive and extensive culture systems to improve profitability. Since bacteria are the key player in aquaculture facilities governing health and quality of fish and prawn, comparative bacteriological analyses were undertaken to understand the suitable testing system of bacterial analysis for cultured freshwater prawn.Methodology: Both on-farm and laboratory conditions in low-resource settings were considered to monitor bacterial population in terms of bacterial count, gram staining and presence of enteric bacteria associated with prawn and its surrounding environment.Results: On-farm counting was about one log-unit lower total viable count in water, sediment and prawn samples compared to those of laboratory testing. The differences between on-farm and laboratory analysis probably occurred due to the time lapse during sample transportation. Study also showed that gram negative bacteria were dominant and enteric bacteria were present in both the prawn farms with more or less similar frequencies.Conclusion: It is concluded that the apparent difference in bacteriological condition of the two farms is possibly related to the differences in culture practices, environment and culture conditions and the study has recommended on-farm testing as an ideal bacteriological analysis method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Probiotic Bacillus on Growth Performance, Immune Response and Disease Resistance in Aquaculture Effect of Growth Temperature on Muscle Lipid Class and Fatty Acid Composition in Adult Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fed Commercial Diets with Different andomega;6 to andomega;3 Fatty Acid Ratios Editorial Note on Photosynthetic Organisms in the Ocean Design Characteristics and Specifications of Gill Net Operated Along the Lower Stretches of Vembanad Wetlands, Kerala, India Growth and Yield Response of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates Inkofele District, Southeastern Oromia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1