通过社区政治来管理安全?瑞典三个城市“安全步行”实践的治理分析

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2021.1894916
Jennie Brandén, Linda Sandberg
{"title":"通过社区政治来管理安全?瑞典三个城市“安全步行”实践的治理分析","authors":"Jennie Brandén, Linda Sandberg","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2021.1894916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Sweden, ‘safety walks’ are a well-established planning practice for improving safety. They involve citizens and local authorities evaluating public spaces in terms of safety. Building on observations, interviews and policy materials, this paper examines safety walks from a governmentality perspective. Our analysis shows that, through the governing techniques employed in the walks, safety problems are rendered technical, auditable and governable, while becoming disconnected from the social and political. Furthermore, the participatory rationale of the walks serves to produce self-governing communities, who are responsible for managing their own safety, while risking the reinforcement of boundaries of inclusion and exclusion within the imagined ‘safe community’.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing safety through the politics of community? A governmentality analysis of the practice of ‘safety walks’ in three Swedish cities\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Brandén, Linda Sandberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562576.2021.1894916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In Sweden, ‘safety walks’ are a well-established planning practice for improving safety. They involve citizens and local authorities evaluating public spaces in terms of safety. Building on observations, interviews and policy materials, this paper examines safety walks from a governmentality perspective. Our analysis shows that, through the governing techniques employed in the walks, safety problems are rendered technical, auditable and governable, while becoming disconnected from the social and political. Furthermore, the participatory rationale of the walks serves to produce self-governing communities, who are responsible for managing their own safety, while risking the reinforcement of boundaries of inclusion and exclusion within the imagined ‘safe community’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1894916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1894916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在瑞典,“安全步行”是一个完善的规划实践,以提高安全性。他们让市民和地方当局评估公共空间的安全性。本文以观察、访谈和政策材料为基础,从治理的角度考察了安全行走。我们的分析表明,通过在步行中使用的治理技术,安全问题变得技术性、可审计性和可治理性,同时与社会和政治脱节。此外,步行的参与性原理有助于产生自治社区,他们负责管理自己的安全,同时冒着在想象的“安全社区”中加强包容和排斥边界的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Governing safety through the politics of community? A governmentality analysis of the practice of ‘safety walks’ in three Swedish cities
ABSTRACT In Sweden, ‘safety walks’ are a well-established planning practice for improving safety. They involve citizens and local authorities evaluating public spaces in terms of safety. Building on observations, interviews and policy materials, this paper examines safety walks from a governmentality perspective. Our analysis shows that, through the governing techniques employed in the walks, safety problems are rendered technical, auditable and governable, while becoming disconnected from the social and political. Furthermore, the participatory rationale of the walks serves to produce self-governing communities, who are responsible for managing their own safety, while risking the reinforcement of boundaries of inclusion and exclusion within the imagined ‘safe community’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPACE AND POLITY
SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.
期刊最新文献
Political and public engagement as topological boundary-making: a critique of ‘Deficit’ approaches in post-communist CEE On purpose: solidarity by accident or design and the generative ambiguity in between Introduction to the special issue on the geographies of populism and populist geographies Sectarian, recreational, or anti-social? Interpreting juvenile violence in post-conflict Belfast Stuck between the EU ‘rock’ and UK ‘hard place’? Northern Ireland as a liminal space after Brexit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1