作为全局质量度量标准的SSIM:一个微分几何视图

T. Richter
{"title":"作为全局质量度量标准的SSIM:一个微分几何视图","authors":"T. Richter","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While traditional image quality metrics like MSE are mathematically well understood and tractable, they are known to correlate weakly to image distortion as observed by human observers. To address this situation, many full reference quality indices have been suggested over the years that correlate better to human perception, one of them being the well-known Structural Similarity Index by Wang and Bovik. However, while these expressions show higher correlations, they are often not very tractable mathematically, and — in specific — are rarely metrics in the strict mathematical sense. Specifically, the triangle inequality is often not satisfied, which could either be seen as an effect of the human visual system being unable to compare images that are visually too different, or as a defect of the index capturing the global situation correctly. In this article, the latter position is taken, and it is shown how the SSIM can be understood as a local approximation of a global metric, namely the geodesic distance on a manifold. While the metric cannot be computed explicitly in most cases, it is nevertheless shown that in specific cases its expression is identical to Weber's Law of luminance sensitivity of the human eye.","PeriodicalId":6441,"journal":{"name":"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"22 1","pages":"189-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SSIM as global quality metric: A differential geometry view\",\"authors\":\"T. Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While traditional image quality metrics like MSE are mathematically well understood and tractable, they are known to correlate weakly to image distortion as observed by human observers. To address this situation, many full reference quality indices have been suggested over the years that correlate better to human perception, one of them being the well-known Structural Similarity Index by Wang and Bovik. However, while these expressions show higher correlations, they are often not very tractable mathematically, and — in specific — are rarely metrics in the strict mathematical sense. Specifically, the triangle inequality is often not satisfied, which could either be seen as an effect of the human visual system being unable to compare images that are visually too different, or as a defect of the index capturing the global situation correctly. In this article, the latter position is taken, and it is shown how the SSIM can be understood as a local approximation of a global metric, namely the geodesic distance on a manifold. While the metric cannot be computed explicitly in most cases, it is nevertheless shown that in specific cases its expression is identical to Weber's Law of luminance sensitivity of the human eye.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"189-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

虽然像MSE这样的传统图像质量指标在数学上很容易理解和处理,但它们与人类观察者观察到的图像失真之间的相关性很弱。为了解决这一问题,多年来人们提出了许多与人类感知更好相关的完整参考质量指标,其中之一是Wang和Bovik提出的著名的结构相似性指数。然而,虽然这些表达式显示出较高的相关性,但它们通常在数学上不是很容易处理,并且-具体地说-很少是严格数学意义上的度量。具体来说,三角不等式往往不满足,这可能是人类视觉系统无法比较视觉上差异太大的图像的影响,也可能是指数正确捕捉全局情况的缺陷。在本文中,采取后一种立场,并展示了如何将SSIM理解为全局度量的局部近似值,即流形上的测地线距离。虽然在大多数情况下不能明确地计算度量,但在特定情况下,它的表达式与人眼亮度灵敏度的韦伯定律相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SSIM as global quality metric: A differential geometry view
While traditional image quality metrics like MSE are mathematically well understood and tractable, they are known to correlate weakly to image distortion as observed by human observers. To address this situation, many full reference quality indices have been suggested over the years that correlate better to human perception, one of them being the well-known Structural Similarity Index by Wang and Bovik. However, while these expressions show higher correlations, they are often not very tractable mathematically, and — in specific — are rarely metrics in the strict mathematical sense. Specifically, the triangle inequality is often not satisfied, which could either be seen as an effect of the human visual system being unable to compare images that are visually too different, or as a defect of the index capturing the global situation correctly. In this article, the latter position is taken, and it is shown how the SSIM can be understood as a local approximation of a global metric, namely the geodesic distance on a manifold. While the metric cannot be computed explicitly in most cases, it is nevertheless shown that in specific cases its expression is identical to Weber's Law of luminance sensitivity of the human eye.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Browsing Audio Transmission Evoking Emotions and Evaluating Emotional Impact Quality of Experience Versus User Experience Crowdsourcing in QoE Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1