贝恩德·弗罗曼的信息重要性

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4918
Ana Karolina Alves Amorim, Rodrigo Rabello da Silva
{"title":"贝恩德·弗罗曼的信息重要性","authors":"Ana Karolina Alves Amorim, Rodrigo Rabello da Silva","doi":"10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bernd Frohmann's investigations have been relevant to the field of information science and related disciplines, addressing topics such as enunciation/discourse, institutionality, dispositives, networks, agency, documentary practices, actors, associations, policies, information regimes, and materiality. These themes are shaped, in terms of materiality, through the stabilization of statements in documents or \"quasi-objects\" that circulate and generate social effects. Therefore, the objective is to analyze the concept of materiality in Frohmann, considering institutional, epistemological, and political implications. Literature review was conducted, including Frohmann's publications from 1992 to 2008, as well as analysis of texts that utilize that theoretical framework. The analysis is based on the assumptions of documentary ontology, whereby documentation is guided by the interplay of document properties, motivations, and agency effects. Within these assumptions, materiality serves as a heuristic resource. The publications offer a distinct overview of documentation studies, differentiating from positivist, functionalist, and/or mentalist approaches. When addressing the materiality of information, Frohmann is primarily interested in the processes it undergoes, such as how the document, as a sociotechnical object and means of materiality stabilization, generates effects in specific contexts with social, epistemological, political, and ethical implications.","PeriodicalId":42520,"journal":{"name":"Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"materialidad de la información en Bernd Frohmann\",\"authors\":\"Ana Karolina Alves Amorim, Rodrigo Rabello da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bernd Frohmann's investigations have been relevant to the field of information science and related disciplines, addressing topics such as enunciation/discourse, institutionality, dispositives, networks, agency, documentary practices, actors, associations, policies, information regimes, and materiality. These themes are shaped, in terms of materiality, through the stabilization of statements in documents or \\\"quasi-objects\\\" that circulate and generate social effects. Therefore, the objective is to analyze the concept of materiality in Frohmann, considering institutional, epistemological, and political implications. Literature review was conducted, including Frohmann's publications from 1992 to 2008, as well as analysis of texts that utilize that theoretical framework. The analysis is based on the assumptions of documentary ontology, whereby documentation is guided by the interplay of document properties, motivations, and agency effects. Within these assumptions, materiality serves as a heuristic resource. The publications offer a distinct overview of documentation studies, differentiating from positivist, functionalist, and/or mentalist approaches. When addressing the materiality of information, Frohmann is primarily interested in the processes it undergoes, such as how the document, as a sociotechnical object and means of materiality stabilization, generates effects in specific contexts with social, epistemological, political, and ethical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Bernd Frohmann的研究涉及信息科学和相关学科领域,涉及的主题包括表述/话语、制度性、否定性、网络、代理、文献实践、行动者、协会、政策、信息制度和物质性。就物质性而言,这些主题是通过文件或“准物体”中的陈述的稳定来形成的,这些陈述流通并产生社会影响。因此,我们的目标是分析弗罗曼的物质性概念,考虑制度、认识论和政治含义。进行文献综述,包括Frohmann从1992年到2008年的出版物,以及使用该理论框架的文本分析。该分析基于文档本体的假设,其中文档由文档属性、动机和代理效应的相互作用指导。在这些假设中,重要性作为一种启发式资源。这些出版物提供了文献研究的独特概述,区别于实证主义、功能主义和/或心理主义方法。当谈到信息的物质性时,Frohmann主要对它所经历的过程感兴趣,例如,作为社会技术对象和物质性稳定手段的文件如何在具有社会、认识论、政治和伦理含义的特定背景下产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
materialidad de la información en Bernd Frohmann
Bernd Frohmann's investigations have been relevant to the field of information science and related disciplines, addressing topics such as enunciation/discourse, institutionality, dispositives, networks, agency, documentary practices, actors, associations, policies, information regimes, and materiality. These themes are shaped, in terms of materiality, through the stabilization of statements in documents or "quasi-objects" that circulate and generate social effects. Therefore, the objective is to analyze the concept of materiality in Frohmann, considering institutional, epistemological, and political implications. Literature review was conducted, including Frohmann's publications from 1992 to 2008, as well as analysis of texts that utilize that theoretical framework. The analysis is based on the assumptions of documentary ontology, whereby documentation is guided by the interplay of document properties, motivations, and agency effects. Within these assumptions, materiality serves as a heuristic resource. The publications offer a distinct overview of documentation studies, differentiating from positivist, functionalist, and/or mentalist approaches. When addressing the materiality of information, Frohmann is primarily interested in the processes it undergoes, such as how the document, as a sociotechnical object and means of materiality stabilization, generates effects in specific contexts with social, epistemological, political, and ethical implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion
Revista General de Informacion y Documentacion INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Las xilografías que ilustran el Thesoro de la Passion de Andrés de Li (Zaragoza, 1494) y sus fuentes grabadas Robert Capa el fotógrafo comprometido: análisis de la fotografía Muerte de un miliciano y su localización Estudio bibliométrico sobre nanociencia y nanotecnología en México basado en la Web of Science Terminology applied in the study of user information when aimed at visually impaired people Bibliotecas universitarias y formación permanente de las personas mayores: análisis de una experiencia en un entorno digital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1