算法时代的民主与法治:对印度互联网关闭的回顾

Dr. Anandkumar R Shindhe
{"title":"算法时代的民主与法治:对印度互联网关闭的回顾","authors":"Dr. Anandkumar R Shindhe","doi":"10.37867/te150245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of this article analyses the algorithmic impact on public participation in the decision-making process and its effects on democratic principles as recognized under the Constitution. Democratic principles are implemented through the Institutions of civil societies, and civil societies have problems with internal and external contractions and trust issues. In the contemporary world, it is observed that the government is silent on public opinion on several of its decision. This silence of government gives rise to several questions, such as – In a democratic setup, to what extent public can participate in the decision-making process of government? To what extent government can curb the voice of people with the help of assisted technologies such as internet shutdown and filter bubbles? What are the possible legitimate ways a government can be accountable for its actions?","PeriodicalId":23114,"journal":{"name":"Towards Excellence","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF LAW IN THE ERA OF ALGORITHMS: A REVIEW ON INTERNET SHUTDOWNS IN INDIA\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Anandkumar R Shindhe\",\"doi\":\"10.37867/te150245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author of this article analyses the algorithmic impact on public participation in the decision-making process and its effects on democratic principles as recognized under the Constitution. Democratic principles are implemented through the Institutions of civil societies, and civil societies have problems with internal and external contractions and trust issues. In the contemporary world, it is observed that the government is silent on public opinion on several of its decision. This silence of government gives rise to several questions, such as – In a democratic setup, to what extent public can participate in the decision-making process of government? To what extent government can curb the voice of people with the help of assisted technologies such as internet shutdown and filter bubbles? What are the possible legitimate ways a government can be accountable for its actions?\",\"PeriodicalId\":23114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Towards Excellence\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Towards Excellence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37867/te150245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Towards Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37867/te150245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的作者分析了算法对公众参与决策过程的影响及其对宪法所承认的民主原则的影响。民主原则是通过民间社会机构来执行的,而民间社会存在内部和外部契约和信任问题。在当代世界,人们观察到政府在一些决定上对公众意见保持沉默。政府的这种沉默引发了一些问题,例如,在民主体制下,公众在多大程度上可以参与政府的决策过程?在互联网关闭和过滤泡沫等辅助技术的帮助下,政府能在多大程度上遏制人们的声音?政府对其行为负责的合法途径有哪些?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF LAW IN THE ERA OF ALGORITHMS: A REVIEW ON INTERNET SHUTDOWNS IN INDIA
The author of this article analyses the algorithmic impact on public participation in the decision-making process and its effects on democratic principles as recognized under the Constitution. Democratic principles are implemented through the Institutions of civil societies, and civil societies have problems with internal and external contractions and trust issues. In the contemporary world, it is observed that the government is silent on public opinion on several of its decision. This silence of government gives rise to several questions, such as – In a democratic setup, to what extent public can participate in the decision-making process of government? To what extent government can curb the voice of people with the help of assisted technologies such as internet shutdown and filter bubbles? What are the possible legitimate ways a government can be accountable for its actions?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ROLE OF SENIOR CITIZENS IN SCHOOLS IN THE LIGHT OF NATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY (NEP) 2020 PERCEPTION OF INDIA IN CHINA AND GERMANY OVERARCHING OVERTONES: ORACLES ON CAREER CHRONICLES OF WOMEN IN INDIAN HOTEL INDUSTRY “બાળકોની શૈક્ષણિક અભિરુચિ, ઇતરપ્રવૃત્તિ અને જીવનશૈલીનો સમાજશાસ્ત્રીય અભ્યાસ અમદાવાદ શહેર (પૂર્વ)ના સંદર્ભમાં” RAW MATERIALS PRICE VOLATILITY AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE JAMNAGAR BRASS PARTS INDUSTRY: A STUDY ON MICRO AND SMALL-SCALE UNITS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1