州侵权改革对索赔申请的影响

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2009-04-27 DOI:10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00060.X
Joan T. Schmit, M. Browne, Han-Duck Lee
{"title":"州侵权改革对索赔申请的影响","authors":"Joan T. Schmit, M. Browne, Han-Duck Lee","doi":"10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00060.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Currently, the U.S. Congress continues to debate the passage of a tort reform bill. Such a bill is intended to limit legal liabilities, particularly as they relate to product accidents. While passage of a federal law in the 1990s remains difficult, many states found tort reform a successful proposition a decade earlier. The intent of this paper is to add to the discussion regarding the expected effects of tort law modifications by providing some background on the most widely enacted state tort reforms, presenting results from the literature on actual and expected effects of these reforms, and presenting new empirical evidence on the efficacy of these same reforms. The results indicate that caps on non-economic damages and imposition of fines on frivolous litigation are negatively related to the rate of tort filings, while modification of joint and several liability demonstrates a positive relationship with the rate of tort filings, and reforms of the collateral source rule and imposition of punitive damages demonstrate no effect.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF STATE TORT REFORMS ON CLAIM FILINGS\",\"authors\":\"Joan T. Schmit, M. Browne, Han-Duck Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00060.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Currently, the U.S. Congress continues to debate the passage of a tort reform bill. Such a bill is intended to limit legal liabilities, particularly as they relate to product accidents. While passage of a federal law in the 1990s remains difficult, many states found tort reform a successful proposition a decade earlier. The intent of this paper is to add to the discussion regarding the expected effects of tort law modifications by providing some background on the most widely enacted state tort reforms, presenting results from the literature on actual and expected effects of these reforms, and presenting new empirical evidence on the efficacy of these same reforms. The results indicate that caps on non-economic damages and imposition of fines on frivolous litigation are negatively related to the rate of tort filings, while modification of joint and several liability demonstrates a positive relationship with the rate of tort filings, and reforms of the collateral source rule and imposition of punitive damages demonstrate no effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00060.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6296.1997.TB00060.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

当前,美国国会继续就是否通过一项侵权法改革法案进行辩论。这一法案旨在限制法律责任,特别是与产品事故有关的法律责任。虽然在20世纪90年代通过一项联邦法律仍然很困难,但许多州发现侵权改革在十年前是一个成功的提议。本文的目的是通过提供一些最广泛实施的州侵权法改革的背景,介绍这些改革的实际效果和预期效果的文献结果,并就这些改革的效果提出新的经验证据,从而增加关于侵权法修改预期效果的讨论。结果表明,非经济损害赔偿的上限和对轻浮诉讼的罚款与侵权行为的提起率呈负相关,而共同责任和连带责任的修改与侵权行为的提起率呈正相关,而附带来源规则的改革和惩罚性赔偿的征收则没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECT OF STATE TORT REFORMS ON CLAIM FILINGS
: Currently, the U.S. Congress continues to debate the passage of a tort reform bill. Such a bill is intended to limit legal liabilities, particularly as they relate to product accidents. While passage of a federal law in the 1990s remains difficult, many states found tort reform a successful proposition a decade earlier. The intent of this paper is to add to the discussion regarding the expected effects of tort law modifications by providing some background on the most widely enacted state tort reforms, presenting results from the literature on actual and expected effects of these reforms, and presenting new empirical evidence on the efficacy of these same reforms. The results indicate that caps on non-economic damages and imposition of fines on frivolous litigation are negatively related to the rate of tort filings, while modification of joint and several liability demonstrates a positive relationship with the rate of tort filings, and reforms of the collateral source rule and imposition of punitive damages demonstrate no effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.
期刊最新文献
Risk‐based thinking for extreme events: What do terrorism and climate change have in common? Insurance and the public–private management of risk at US commercial nuclear power plants InsurTech in the United States and Germany—What are the drivers behind the different business models? The importance of risk and insurance teaching within the ARIA mission On the correlation of self‐reported and behavioral risk attitude measures: The case of the General Risk Question and the Investment Game following Gneezy and Potters (1997)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1