互动时代的公共关系

A. Sévigny
{"title":"互动时代的公共关系","authors":"A. Sévigny","doi":"10.15173/JPC.V4I1.2593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This editorial for the issue 1, volume 4 of the Journal of Professional Communication discusses how social media has ushered in a new era of interactivity which has created an entirely new arena for the practice of public relations and communications management. It traces the development of practice through the modernist era, which privileged structure, science and rationality to the postmodern era which the author argues was essentially a reaction to the rigidity of modernism. It is argued that postmodernism as an era is also complete, replaced by a new way of organizing thoughts and relationships brought on by the powerful and relatively easy interactivity offered by the internet and digital devices. The author concludes by arguing that Bernays’ conception of public relations was steeped in the ideas of the modernist era and that, ironically, it is McLuhan’s conception of the distinction between the artist and the scientist and the practice of pattern finding that will rule.  ©Journal of Professional Communication, all rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public relations in the interactive era\",\"authors\":\"A. Sévigny\",\"doi\":\"10.15173/JPC.V4I1.2593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This editorial for the issue 1, volume 4 of the Journal of Professional Communication discusses how social media has ushered in a new era of interactivity which has created an entirely new arena for the practice of public relations and communications management. It traces the development of practice through the modernist era, which privileged structure, science and rationality to the postmodern era which the author argues was essentially a reaction to the rigidity of modernism. It is argued that postmodernism as an era is also complete, replaced by a new way of organizing thoughts and relationships brought on by the powerful and relatively easy interactivity offered by the internet and digital devices. The author concludes by arguing that Bernays’ conception of public relations was steeped in the ideas of the modernist era and that, ironically, it is McLuhan’s conception of the distinction between the artist and the scientist and the practice of pattern finding that will rule.  ©Journal of Professional Communication, all rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15173/JPC.V4I1.2593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/JPC.V4I1.2593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《专业传播杂志》第4卷第1期的这篇社论讨论了社交媒体如何开创了一个互动的新时代,为公共关系和传播管理的实践创造了一个全新的舞台。它追溯了现代主义时代的实践发展,将结构、科学和理性赋予了后现代主义的特权,作者认为后现代主义本质上是对现代主义僵化的一种反应。后现代主义作为一个时代也已经完成,取而代之的是一种新的组织思想和关系的方式,这种方式是由互联网和数字设备提供的强大而相对容易的交互性所带来的。作者最后认为,伯内斯的公共关系概念浸染在现代主义时代的思想中,具有讽刺意味的是,麦克卢汉关于艺术家和科学家之间区别的概念以及模式发现的实践将占主导地位。©Journal of Professional Communication,版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public relations in the interactive era
This editorial for the issue 1, volume 4 of the Journal of Professional Communication discusses how social media has ushered in a new era of interactivity which has created an entirely new arena for the practice of public relations and communications management. It traces the development of practice through the modernist era, which privileged structure, science and rationality to the postmodern era which the author argues was essentially a reaction to the rigidity of modernism. It is argued that postmodernism as an era is also complete, replaced by a new way of organizing thoughts and relationships brought on by the powerful and relatively easy interactivity offered by the internet and digital devices. The author concludes by arguing that Bernays’ conception of public relations was steeped in the ideas of the modernist era and that, ironically, it is McLuhan’s conception of the distinction between the artist and the scientist and the practice of pattern finding that will rule.  ©Journal of Professional Communication, all rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Funktionen von Unsicherheitsthematisierungen in journalistischen Medien The Impact of Communicating Advocacy and Scientific Uncertainty on a Scientist’s Trustworthiness Corpus Approaches to Analysing Uncertainty and Ignorance in Academic Discourse Konstitution von Nichtwissen und Unsicherheit im Sprachgebrauch – ein programmatischer Systematisierungsversuch Beraten und Prognostizieren. Unsicheres Wissen in der institutionellen vs. der massenmedialen Politikberatung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1