Global weakness of the paper: “Mass-energy equivalence Extension onto a Superfluid Quantum Vacuum” i.e. why the so-called “model” introduced is in this form not viable

With these comments, I wish to focus on the problems encountered in the paper: Sorli, A.S. Mass - Energy Equivalence Extension onto a Superfluid Quantum Vacuum. Sci Rep 9, 11737 (2019). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48018-2. The paper denotes problems of conceptual, technical and aesthetic nature, and brings as support of a possible “introduced model”, as indicated there, extremely poor mathematical concepts, confused ideas and concepts in general, inadequate qualitative figures, everything presented in a questionable English. It follows an analysis of the critical found points.