分次呼气一氧化氮试验在中国皮质类固醇反应性咳嗽患者中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析

Zhijing Wang, Miao Wang, Shengyuan Wang, Li Yu
{"title":"分次呼气一氧化氮试验在中国皮质类固醇反应性咳嗽患者中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Zhijing Wang, Miao Wang, Shengyuan Wang, Li Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) test in corticosteroid responsive cough (CRC) patients in China, and provide evidences for clinical treatment. \n \n \nMethods \nWe searched China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc, in Chinese), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, in Chinese), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP, in Chinese), Wanfang date (in Chinese), Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of science and Embase databases and selected articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The outcome indicators included the value of FeNO, sensitivity, specificity and so on.We used Statistical analysis software RevMan5.3 and stata12.0 for meta analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 13 studies selected finally.The results showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients was significantly higher than that of in non-corticosteroids responsive cough (NCRC) patients [MD=20.44, 95%CI: (15.29-25.59), P<0.05]. In subgroup analysis, we found that the value of FeNO in cough variant asthma (CVA) patients was obviously higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=30.03, 95%CI: (21.43-38.63), P<0.05]. Similarly, the level of FeNO in eosinophilic bronchitis (EB) patients was also higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=12.32, 95%CI: (9.02-15.61), P<0.05]. And it was showed that in patients of CRC, the pooled sensitivity was 0.74(95%CI: 0.67-0.80), the pooled specificity was 0.87(95%CI: 0.83-0.91), positive likelihood ratio was 5.8(95%CI: 4.3-7.8), negative likelihood ratio was 0.30(95%CI: 0.23-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio was 20(95%CI: 12-31), and area under SROC curve was 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.91). Of that, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the SROC curve of CVA were 0.80(95%CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.85(95%CI: 0.80-0.90), 5.5(95%CI: 3.8-7.9), 0.24(95%CI: 0.18-0.32), 23(95%CI: 13-42), and 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.92). And we could not do diagnostic analysis in EB and AC patients, for there were only 3 and 1 studies included. \n \n \nConclusions \nAt present, we have showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients is significantly higher than that of in chronic cough patients with other causes, and FeNO has important clinical significance in the diagnosis of CRC patients in China.It can provide an experiential treatment strategy for chronic cough patients with high FeNO.However, there still needs large-scale studies in the analysis, due to the limitations of the research quality and the sample size. \n \n \nKey words: \nNitric oxide; Cough; Glucocorticoids; Diagnosis","PeriodicalId":10004,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","volume":"13 1","pages":"359-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide test in corticosteroid responsive cough patients in China: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhijing Wang, Miao Wang, Shengyuan Wang, Li Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) test in corticosteroid responsive cough (CRC) patients in China, and provide evidences for clinical treatment. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nWe searched China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc, in Chinese), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, in Chinese), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP, in Chinese), Wanfang date (in Chinese), Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of science and Embase databases and selected articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The outcome indicators included the value of FeNO, sensitivity, specificity and so on.We used Statistical analysis software RevMan5.3 and stata12.0 for meta analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were 13 studies selected finally.The results showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients was significantly higher than that of in non-corticosteroids responsive cough (NCRC) patients [MD=20.44, 95%CI: (15.29-25.59), P<0.05]. In subgroup analysis, we found that the value of FeNO in cough variant asthma (CVA) patients was obviously higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=30.03, 95%CI: (21.43-38.63), P<0.05]. Similarly, the level of FeNO in eosinophilic bronchitis (EB) patients was also higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=12.32, 95%CI: (9.02-15.61), P<0.05]. And it was showed that in patients of CRC, the pooled sensitivity was 0.74(95%CI: 0.67-0.80), the pooled specificity was 0.87(95%CI: 0.83-0.91), positive likelihood ratio was 5.8(95%CI: 4.3-7.8), negative likelihood ratio was 0.30(95%CI: 0.23-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio was 20(95%CI: 12-31), and area under SROC curve was 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.91). Of that, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the SROC curve of CVA were 0.80(95%CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.85(95%CI: 0.80-0.90), 5.5(95%CI: 3.8-7.9), 0.24(95%CI: 0.18-0.32), 23(95%CI: 13-42), and 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.92). And we could not do diagnostic analysis in EB and AC patients, for there were only 3 and 1 studies included. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nAt present, we have showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients is significantly higher than that of in chronic cough patients with other causes, and FeNO has important clinical significance in the diagnosis of CRC patients in China.It can provide an experiential treatment strategy for chronic cough patients with high FeNO.However, there still needs large-scale studies in the analysis, due to the limitations of the research quality and the sample size. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nNitric oxide; Cough; Glucocorticoids; Diagnosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":10004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"359-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-436X.2020.05.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)分数次检测在中国地区皮质类固醇反应性咳嗽(CRC)患者中的诊断价值,为临床治疗提供依据。方法检索中国生物医学数据库(CBMdisc,中文)、中国知网(CNKI,中文)、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP,中文)、万方数据库(中文)、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science和Embase等数据库,并根据纳入和排除标准选择文章。结果指标包括FeNO值、敏感性、特异性等。采用统计分析软件RevMan5.3和stata12.0进行meta分析。结果最终入选13项研究。结果显示,结直肠癌患者的FeNO值显著高于非糖皮质激素应答性咳嗽(NCRC)患者[MD=20.44, 95%CI: (15.29 ~ 25.59), P<0.05]。在亚组分析中,我们发现咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)患者的FeNO值明显高于其他慢性咳嗽患者[MD=30.03, 95%CI: (21.43 ~ 38.63), P<0.05]。同样,嗜酸性支气管炎(EB)患者FeNO水平也高于其他慢性咳嗽患者[MD=12.32, 95%CI: (9.02-15.61), P<0.05]。结果显示,在结直肠癌患者中,合并敏感性为0.74(95%CI: 0.67 ~ 0.80),合并特异性为0.87(95%CI: 0.83 ~ 0.91),阳性似然比为5.8(95%CI: 4.3 ~ 7.8),阴性似然比为0.30(95%CI: 0.23 ~ 0.38),诊断优势比为20(95%CI: 12 ~ 31), SROC曲线下面积为0.89(95%CI: 0.86 ~ 0.91)。其中,CVA的综合敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比和SROC曲线下面积分别为0.80(95%CI: 0.74 ~ 0.84)、0.85(95%CI: 0.80 ~ 0.90)、5.5(95%CI: 3.8 ~ 7.9)、0.24(95%CI: 0.18 ~ 0.32)、23(95%CI: 13 ~ 42)和0.89(95%CI: 0.86 ~ 0.92)。我们无法对EB和AC患者进行诊断分析,因为只纳入了3项和1项研究。目前,我们已经发现FeNO在结直肠癌患者中的价值明显高于其他原因的慢性咳嗽患者,FeNO在中国结直肠癌患者的诊断中具有重要的临床意义。为慢性咳嗽高FeNO患者提供一种体验性治疗策略。然而,由于研究质量和样本量的限制,在分析中还需要进行大规模的研究。关键词:一氧化氮;咳嗽;糖皮质激素;诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide test in corticosteroid responsive cough patients in China: a meta-analysis
Objective To evaluate diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) test in corticosteroid responsive cough (CRC) patients in China, and provide evidences for clinical treatment. Methods We searched China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc, in Chinese), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, in Chinese), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP, in Chinese), Wanfang date (in Chinese), Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of science and Embase databases and selected articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The outcome indicators included the value of FeNO, sensitivity, specificity and so on.We used Statistical analysis software RevMan5.3 and stata12.0 for meta analysis. Results There were 13 studies selected finally.The results showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients was significantly higher than that of in non-corticosteroids responsive cough (NCRC) patients [MD=20.44, 95%CI: (15.29-25.59), P<0.05]. In subgroup analysis, we found that the value of FeNO in cough variant asthma (CVA) patients was obviously higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=30.03, 95%CI: (21.43-38.63), P<0.05]. Similarly, the level of FeNO in eosinophilic bronchitis (EB) patients was also higher than that of in other patients with chronic cough [MD=12.32, 95%CI: (9.02-15.61), P<0.05]. And it was showed that in patients of CRC, the pooled sensitivity was 0.74(95%CI: 0.67-0.80), the pooled specificity was 0.87(95%CI: 0.83-0.91), positive likelihood ratio was 5.8(95%CI: 4.3-7.8), negative likelihood ratio was 0.30(95%CI: 0.23-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio was 20(95%CI: 12-31), and area under SROC curve was 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.91). Of that, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the SROC curve of CVA were 0.80(95%CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.85(95%CI: 0.80-0.90), 5.5(95%CI: 3.8-7.9), 0.24(95%CI: 0.18-0.32), 23(95%CI: 13-42), and 0.89(95%CI: 0.86-0.92). And we could not do diagnostic analysis in EB and AC patients, for there were only 3 and 1 studies included. Conclusions At present, we have showed that the value of FeNO in CRC patients is significantly higher than that of in chronic cough patients with other causes, and FeNO has important clinical significance in the diagnosis of CRC patients in China.It can provide an experiential treatment strategy for chronic cough patients with high FeNO.However, there still needs large-scale studies in the analysis, due to the limitations of the research quality and the sample size. Key words: Nitric oxide; Cough; Glucocorticoids; Diagnosis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research progress of obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome and coronary heart disease The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and optic neuropathy Correlationship between oxidative damage and IP-10, Rantes in lung cancer patients Correlation between NADPH oxidase 4 and epithelial mesenchymal transformation in non-small cell lung cancer Efficacy and safety of intravenous antibiotics combined with inhalation of amikacin versus intravenous antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1