[期刊影响因子作为评价研究者和研究的参数]。

K. Kaltenborn, Klaus Kuhn
{"title":"[期刊影响因子作为评价研究者和研究的参数]。","authors":"K. Kaltenborn, Klaus Kuhn","doi":"10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":"15 1","pages":"153-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].\",\"authors\":\"K. Kaltenborn, Klaus Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"153-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082004000700004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

美国费城科学信息研究所(Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, USA)每年发布的期刊影响因子(journal impact factor, IF)在德国和其他欧洲国家被广泛用作科学计量参数,用于评价研究和研究人员。本文对IF进行了批判性分析。它首先处理医学知识的生产、转移和使用过程,因为IF由于其反身性而介入这些过程。本文从作者、期刊和医学学科的层面以及社会中的社会知识过程等方面讨论了IF的反身性所产生的次生效应。此外,本文还讨论了影响因子在多大程度上适合于评估特定文章、期刊或个人和集体研究成果的质量。本文呼吁(1)根据德国研究委员会(Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)和科学医学学会协会(Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften)的建议进行研究评估,(2)更深入地从事和组织医学知识过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].
The journal impact factor (IF), which is published annually by the Institute for Scientific Information, (Philadelphia, USA), is meanwhile in widespread use as a scientometric parameter for the evaluation of research and researchers in Germany and other European countries. The present article subjects the IF to critical analysis. It first deals with processes of production, transfer, and use of medical knowledge, because the IF intervenes in these processes on account of its reflexivity. Secondary effects of the IF resulting from its reflexivity are discussed with the focus on the level of the author, the journal and the medical discipline as well as on social knowledge processes in society. In addition, the extent to which the IF is appropriate for evaluating the quality of a specific article, of a journal or of individual and collective research achievements is discussed. The present article calls for (1) research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) and of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies) and (2) more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinische Klinik
Medizinische Klinik 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Liver--gallbladder]. [Iron deficiency]. [Frontotemporal dementia]. [Hepatic encephalopathy]. [ON CHILD ABUSE].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1