董事会资本到底带来了什么?

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS American Journal of Business Pub Date : 2019-11-15 DOI:10.1108/ajb-09-2018-0050
W. D. Fernandez, Yannick Thams, M. Lehrer
{"title":"董事会资本到底带来了什么?","authors":"W. D. Fernandez, Yannick Thams, M. Lehrer","doi":"10.1108/ajb-09-2018-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although resource dependence theory (RDT) has substantially deepened the understanding of the function and role of boards, no systematic review of this body of work has yet been undertaken. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize prior research on the strategically relevant resources provided by board members to their organization in the light of RDT and indicate avenues for future research.,The review covers 79 research articles from 1978 to 2016 dealing with the resource provision of boards of directors.,Board capital research most often assumes a positive, linear relationship between board capital, resource provision and ultimately firm-level performance outcomes. This tendency tends to exclude from view the possibility of important trade-offs relevant to both theory and practice. Future research will need to incorporate more complex models that take into consideration nonlinear and curvilinear effects. The authors outline opportunities to advance board research by refining the methodological techniques employed.,By recommending investigation of the important trade-offs inherent in board composition, the authors seek to inspire future research that offers practical guidance for improving the effectiveness of corporate boards.","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"85 1","pages":"134-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does board capital really bring to the table?\",\"authors\":\"W. D. Fernandez, Yannick Thams, M. Lehrer\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ajb-09-2018-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although resource dependence theory (RDT) has substantially deepened the understanding of the function and role of boards, no systematic review of this body of work has yet been undertaken. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize prior research on the strategically relevant resources provided by board members to their organization in the light of RDT and indicate avenues for future research.,The review covers 79 research articles from 1978 to 2016 dealing with the resource provision of boards of directors.,Board capital research most often assumes a positive, linear relationship between board capital, resource provision and ultimately firm-level performance outcomes. This tendency tends to exclude from view the possibility of important trade-offs relevant to both theory and practice. Future research will need to incorporate more complex models that take into consideration nonlinear and curvilinear effects. The authors outline opportunities to advance board research by refining the methodological techniques employed.,By recommending investigation of the important trade-offs inherent in board composition, the authors seek to inspire future research that offers practical guidance for improving the effectiveness of corporate boards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Business\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"134-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-09-2018-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-09-2018-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然资源依赖理论(RDT)大大加深了对董事会功能和作用的理解,但尚未对这一工作进行系统的审查。本文的目的是综合之前关于董事会成员在RDT下为其组织提供的战略相关资源的研究,并指出未来研究的途径。本综述涵盖了1978年至2016年间79篇关于董事会资源提供的研究文章。董事会资本研究通常假设董事会资本、资源供应和最终公司绩效结果之间存在正线性关系。这种倾向倾向于排除与理论和实践相关的重要权衡的可能性。未来的研究将需要纳入更复杂的模型,考虑到非线性和曲线效应。作者概述了通过改进所采用的方法技术来推进董事会研究的机会。通过建议对董事会组成中固有的重要权衡进行调查,作者试图激发未来的研究,为提高公司董事会的有效性提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does board capital really bring to the table?
Although resource dependence theory (RDT) has substantially deepened the understanding of the function and role of boards, no systematic review of this body of work has yet been undertaken. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize prior research on the strategically relevant resources provided by board members to their organization in the light of RDT and indicate avenues for future research.,The review covers 79 research articles from 1978 to 2016 dealing with the resource provision of boards of directors.,Board capital research most often assumes a positive, linear relationship between board capital, resource provision and ultimately firm-level performance outcomes. This tendency tends to exclude from view the possibility of important trade-offs relevant to both theory and practice. Future research will need to incorporate more complex models that take into consideration nonlinear and curvilinear effects. The authors outline opportunities to advance board research by refining the methodological techniques employed.,By recommending investigation of the important trade-offs inherent in board composition, the authors seek to inspire future research that offers practical guidance for improving the effectiveness of corporate boards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19 CEO political ideology and credit risk assessment Investor attention during soccer World Cups Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Micro and Small Business Context – Systematic Literature Review A Practical Guide to Writing Performance Appraisals and Letters of Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1