妇科检查指南:伦理-法律观点和挑战

D. Bowman
{"title":"妇科检查指南:伦理-法律观点和挑战","authors":"D. Bowman","doi":"10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper discusses the RCOG guidelines on examinations with specific reference to two ethico-legal dilemmas, namely a) a patient's request that an examination be performed without a chaperone and b) concerns that a colleague is not practising in accordance with the guidelines. Each scenario is discussed in the context of the law and ethical concepts of autonomy, trust and accountability. It is argued that guidelines provide a starting point for clinicians, but ethical sensitivity, reflection and professional judgement remain essential to maintaining standards in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84528,"journal":{"name":"Current obstetrics & gynaecology","volume":"15 5","pages":"Pages 348-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.07.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines on gynaecological examinations: Ethico-legal perspectives and challenges\",\"authors\":\"D. Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper discusses the RCOG guidelines on examinations with specific reference to two ethico-legal dilemmas, namely a) a patient's request that an examination be performed without a chaperone and b) concerns that a colleague is not practising in accordance with the guidelines. Each scenario is discussed in the context of the law and ethical concepts of autonomy, trust and accountability. It is argued that guidelines provide a starting point for clinicians, but ethical sensitivity, reflection and professional judgement remain essential to maintaining standards in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current obstetrics & gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 348-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current obstetrics & gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957584705000636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current obstetrics & gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957584705000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了RCOG关于检查的指导方针,具体涉及两个伦理-法律困境,即a)患者要求在没有陪伴的情况下进行检查,b)担心同事没有按照指导方针执业。每一种情况都是在法律和自治、信任和问责制的伦理概念的背景下讨论的。有人认为,指导方针为临床医生提供了一个起点,但伦理敏感性、反思和专业判断对于维持临床实践中的标准仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidelines on gynaecological examinations: Ethico-legal perspectives and challenges

This paper discusses the RCOG guidelines on examinations with specific reference to two ethico-legal dilemmas, namely a) a patient's request that an examination be performed without a chaperone and b) concerns that a colleague is not practising in accordance with the guidelines. Each scenario is discussed in the context of the law and ethical concepts of autonomy, trust and accountability. It is argued that guidelines provide a starting point for clinicians, but ethical sensitivity, reflection and professional judgement remain essential to maintaining standards in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choice of contraception Early pregnancy units and problems in early pregnancy Investigation and treatment of urinary incontinence Sickle cell disease in pregnancy Thromboembolism and thrombophilia in pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1