小麦种植制度生产力、盈利能力和经济效益评价

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041
M. Nawaz, S. Anjum, U. Ashraf, I. Khan, S. Hussain, A. Zohaib, Y. Hubiao, W. Zhiyong
{"title":"小麦种植制度生产力、盈利能力和经济效益评价","authors":"M. Nawaz, S. Anjum, U. Ashraf, I. Khan, S. Hussain, A. Zohaib, Y. Hubiao, W. Zhiyong","doi":"10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cropping system throughout assessment exhibits importance for the crop production and cultural practices profitability. This field study was undertaken in semi-arid climate to devise suitable system. Wheat was sown in winter season while, summer crops include; cotton, maize and mungbean, which were sown under conventional tillage (CT), permanent beds (PB) and no tillage (NT) respectively. Yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by tillage systems, highest productive tillers (m), grains per spike and 1000-grain weight (g) was observed in permanent beds (PB). Grain yield (tha) was also significantly higher (4.03 t ha) in PB. System productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield (WEY) of maize-wheat (MW) under PB was higher (10.26 t ha) followed by mungbean-wheat in permanent bed (9.40 t ha) and cotton-wheat in conventional tillage (9.26 tha). Highest cultivation cost was observed in the cotton-wheat followed by maize-wheat under conventional tillage and least was observed in the mungbean-wheat in no tillage. Cotton-wheat (CW) gave maximum net field benefit (US$. 1606.53ha) in under PB followed by mungbean-wheat (MbW) (US$.1411.72ha). However, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) (3.77) was recorded in mungbean-wheat system. Moreover, the cotton-wheat in permanent bed system was the best possible option for acquiring high production and land","PeriodicalId":14924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSESSMENT OF CROPPING SYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITABILITY AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT\",\"authors\":\"M. Nawaz, S. Anjum, U. Ashraf, I. Khan, S. Hussain, A. Zohaib, Y. Hubiao, W. Zhiyong\",\"doi\":\"10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cropping system throughout assessment exhibits importance for the crop production and cultural practices profitability. This field study was undertaken in semi-arid climate to devise suitable system. Wheat was sown in winter season while, summer crops include; cotton, maize and mungbean, which were sown under conventional tillage (CT), permanent beds (PB) and no tillage (NT) respectively. Yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by tillage systems, highest productive tillers (m), grains per spike and 1000-grain weight (g) was observed in permanent beds (PB). Grain yield (tha) was also significantly higher (4.03 t ha) in PB. System productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield (WEY) of maize-wheat (MW) under PB was higher (10.26 t ha) followed by mungbean-wheat in permanent bed (9.40 t ha) and cotton-wheat in conventional tillage (9.26 tha). Highest cultivation cost was observed in the cotton-wheat followed by maize-wheat under conventional tillage and least was observed in the mungbean-wheat in no tillage. Cotton-wheat (CW) gave maximum net field benefit (US$. 1606.53ha) in under PB followed by mungbean-wheat (MbW) (US$.1411.72ha). However, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) (3.77) was recorded in mungbean-wheat system. Moreover, the cotton-wheat in permanent bed system was the best possible option for acquiring high production and land\",\"PeriodicalId\":14924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

整个评估显示出种植制度对作物生产和文化实践盈利能力的重要性。本研究是在半干旱气候条件下进行的,以设计合适的系统。小麦在冬季播种,而夏季作物包括;棉花、玉米和绿豆分别采用常规耕作(CT)、永久垄作(PB)和免耕(NT)。不同耕作制度对产量和产量性状有显著影响,永久床(PB)的最高有效分蘖数(m)、每穗粒数和千粒重(g)。籽粒产量(tha)也显著高于PB (4.03 tha)。以玉米-小麦(MW)的小麦当量产量(WEY)计算,PB模式下的系统生产力最高(10.26 tha),其次是绿豆-小麦(9.40 tha)和常规耕作的棉麦(9.26 tha)。常规耕作方式下,棉花-小麦种植成本最高,其次是玉米-小麦,免耕方式下绿豆-小麦种植成本最低。棉麦(CW)的田间净效益最高(美元)。其次是绿豆小麦(MbW)(1.1411.72公顷)。而绿豆-小麦体系的最大效益成本比(BCR)为3.77。此外,棉麦永久床制是获得高产和土地的最佳选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASSESSMENT OF CROPPING SYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITABILITY AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT
Cropping system throughout assessment exhibits importance for the crop production and cultural practices profitability. This field study was undertaken in semi-arid climate to devise suitable system. Wheat was sown in winter season while, summer crops include; cotton, maize and mungbean, which were sown under conventional tillage (CT), permanent beds (PB) and no tillage (NT) respectively. Yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by tillage systems, highest productive tillers (m), grains per spike and 1000-grain weight (g) was observed in permanent beds (PB). Grain yield (tha) was also significantly higher (4.03 t ha) in PB. System productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield (WEY) of maize-wheat (MW) under PB was higher (10.26 t ha) followed by mungbean-wheat in permanent bed (9.40 t ha) and cotton-wheat in conventional tillage (9.26 tha). Highest cultivation cost was observed in the cotton-wheat followed by maize-wheat under conventional tillage and least was observed in the mungbean-wheat in no tillage. Cotton-wheat (CW) gave maximum net field benefit (US$. 1606.53ha) in under PB followed by mungbean-wheat (MbW) (US$.1411.72ha). However, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) (3.77) was recorded in mungbean-wheat system. Moreover, the cotton-wheat in permanent bed system was the best possible option for acquiring high production and land
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences (JAPS) is a bi-monthly publication and is being published regularly since 1991 by the Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum (PAS FORUM). It publishes original research papers, review, extension/clinical articles on all aspects of animal (including fisheries/wildlife) and plant sciences, agricultural economics, rural sociology and other related subjects. The journal is read, abstracted and indexed by the abstracting/indexing agencies of international repute.
期刊最新文献
ROOT REGENERATION OF OLIVE (OLEA EUROPAEAL.) CUTTINGS: EFFECTS OF MEDIA INJECTIONS AND DELAYED APPLICATIONS OF AUXINS INVESTIGATION OF ROTAVIRUS INFECTION IN COW CALVES AND ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS WITH HAEMATO-BIOCHEMICAL ALTERATIONS GLOBAL PREVALENCE OF FELINE CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (FCOV) IN DOMESTIC CATS: SYSTEMATIC META-ANALYSIS EVALUATION OF ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIVITY, ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES AND TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT OF THE ETHANOLIC EXTRACTS OF RHUS PENTAPHYLLA LEAVES AND FRUITS FROM MOROCCO EFFECT OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZER DOSES ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF COMMON BEANS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1