成功之路:在线社区用户行为和成功标准的研究

Erik Aumayr, Conor Hayes
{"title":"成功之路:在线社区用户行为和成功标准的研究","authors":"Erik Aumayr, Conor Hayes","doi":"10.1145/3106426.3106469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintaining online communities is vital in order to increase and retain their economic and social value. That is why community managers look to gauge the success of their communities by measuring a variety of user behaviour, such as member activity, turnover and interaction. However, such communities vary widely in their purpose, implementation and user demographics, and although many success indicators have been proposed in the literature, we will show that there is no one-fits-all approach to community success: Different success criteria depend on different user behaviour. To demonstrate this, we put together a set of user behaviour features, including many that have been used in the literature as indicators of success, and then we define and predict community success in three different types of online communities: Questions & Answers (Q&A), Healthcare and Emotional Support (Life & Health), and Encyclopaedic Knowledge Creation. The results show that it is feasible to relate community success to specific user behaviour with an accuracy of 0.67--0.93 F1 score and 0.77--1.0 AUC.","PeriodicalId":20685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The path to success: a study of user behaviour and success criteria in online communities\",\"authors\":\"Erik Aumayr, Conor Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3106426.3106469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maintaining online communities is vital in order to increase and retain their economic and social value. That is why community managers look to gauge the success of their communities by measuring a variety of user behaviour, such as member activity, turnover and interaction. However, such communities vary widely in their purpose, implementation and user demographics, and although many success indicators have been proposed in the literature, we will show that there is no one-fits-all approach to community success: Different success criteria depend on different user behaviour. To demonstrate this, we put together a set of user behaviour features, including many that have been used in the literature as indicators of success, and then we define and predict community success in three different types of online communities: Questions & Answers (Q&A), Healthcare and Emotional Support (Life & Health), and Encyclopaedic Knowledge Creation. The results show that it is feasible to relate community success to specific user behaviour with an accuracy of 0.67--0.93 F1 score and 0.77--1.0 AUC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

维护在线社区对于增加和保持其经济和社会价值至关重要。这就是为什么社区管理者希望通过衡量各种用户行为来衡量他们社区的成功,比如会员活动、营业额和互动。然而,这些社区在其目的、实施和用户人口统计方面差异很大,尽管文献中提出了许多成功指标,但我们将表明,社区成功没有放之四海而皆准的方法:不同的成功标准取决于不同的用户行为。为了证明这一点,我们收集了一组用户行为特征,包括许多在文献中被用作成功指标的特征,然后我们在三种不同类型的在线社区中定义和预测社区的成功:问答(Q&A),医疗保健和情感支持(生命与健康),以及百科全书式知识创造。结果表明,将社区成功与特定用户行为联系起来是可行的,其准确性为0.67- 0.93 F1分数和0.77- 1.0 AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The path to success: a study of user behaviour and success criteria in online communities
Maintaining online communities is vital in order to increase and retain their economic and social value. That is why community managers look to gauge the success of their communities by measuring a variety of user behaviour, such as member activity, turnover and interaction. However, such communities vary widely in their purpose, implementation and user demographics, and although many success indicators have been proposed in the literature, we will show that there is no one-fits-all approach to community success: Different success criteria depend on different user behaviour. To demonstrate this, we put together a set of user behaviour features, including many that have been used in the literature as indicators of success, and then we define and predict community success in three different types of online communities: Questions & Answers (Q&A), Healthcare and Emotional Support (Life & Health), and Encyclopaedic Knowledge Creation. The results show that it is feasible to relate community success to specific user behaviour with an accuracy of 0.67--0.93 F1 score and 0.77--1.0 AUC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WIMS 2020: The 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, Biarritz, France, June 30 - July 3, 2020 A deep learning approach for web service interactions Partial sums-based P-Rank computation in information networks Mining ordinal data under human response uncertainty Haste makes waste: a case to favour voting bots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1