不变性,对称性和合法性

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Agora-Papeles de Filosofia Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.15304/AG.38.2.5567
J. L. Rolleri
{"title":"不变性,对称性和合法性","authors":"J. L. Rolleri","doi":"10.15304/AG.38.2.5567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I attempt mainly to elucidate the claim, advanced by Woorward (1992), that the key notion to characterize physical laws is that of invariance. I draw a distinction betwen two levels of invariance in order to elaborate that thesis. I maintain that distinctive marks of the nomic status of basic laws of physics are either that they hold invariantly, within a domain of applivation, or that they fulfill some principles of symmetry. The fomer mark relatesd to the manner in which physical systems change invariantly whereas the latter concerns to the invariance of the laws themselves. This view contrats with the traditional philosophical thesis that physical laws are true universal statements with a necessary character which differentiate then from accidental true generalizations, which are contingent.","PeriodicalId":41083,"journal":{"name":"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia","volume":"457 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invariance, symmetry and lawfulness\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Rolleri\",\"doi\":\"10.15304/AG.38.2.5567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I attempt mainly to elucidate the claim, advanced by Woorward (1992), that the key notion to characterize physical laws is that of invariance. I draw a distinction betwen two levels of invariance in order to elaborate that thesis. I maintain that distinctive marks of the nomic status of basic laws of physics are either that they hold invariantly, within a domain of applivation, or that they fulfill some principles of symmetry. The fomer mark relatesd to the manner in which physical systems change invariantly whereas the latter concerns to the invariance of the laws themselves. This view contrats with the traditional philosophical thesis that physical laws are true universal statements with a necessary character which differentiate then from accidental true generalizations, which are contingent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"457 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15304/AG.38.2.5567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15304/AG.38.2.5567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我主要试图阐明woodward(1992)提出的主张,即表征物理定律的关键概念是不变性。我在不变性的两个层次之间画了一个区别,以便详细阐述这个论点。我认为,基本物理定律的经济学地位的显著标志,要么是它们在一定的应用范围内保持不变,要么是它们满足某些对称原则。前者与物理系统不变变化的方式有关,而后者则与定律本身的不变性有关。这种观点与传统的哲学命题相反,即物理定律是真正的普遍陈述,具有必要的特征,将其与偶然的真正概括区分开来,后者是偶然的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Invariance, symmetry and lawfulness
In this paper I attempt mainly to elucidate the claim, advanced by Woorward (1992), that the key notion to characterize physical laws is that of invariance. I draw a distinction betwen two levels of invariance in order to elaborate that thesis. I maintain that distinctive marks of the nomic status of basic laws of physics are either that they hold invariantly, within a domain of applivation, or that they fulfill some principles of symmetry. The fomer mark relatesd to the manner in which physical systems change invariantly whereas the latter concerns to the invariance of the laws themselves. This view contrats with the traditional philosophical thesis that physical laws are true universal statements with a necessary character which differentiate then from accidental true generalizations, which are contingent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
LORENZ, Ulrike, VALK, Thorsten (Hg.): "Kult – Kunst – Kapital: das Nietzsche-Archiv und die Moderne um 1900", Wallstein Verlag, Göttingen, 2020, 387p. DESPRET, Vinciane: "A la salud de los muertos. Relatos de quienes quedan", traducción de Pablo Méndez, La Oveja Roja, Madrid, 2022, 192p. Evaluadoras/es de "Agora". "Papeles de filosofía" (2022-2023) MONTEIRO, Hugo: "Migrações e hospitalidades. Crítica do cosmopolitismo nas fronteiras do século", Húmus, V.N. Famalicão, 2022, 154p. EDUARDO LOURENÇO: UM POETA DA FILOSOFIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1