非鼻特异性评分在术后Snot22问卷调查中的效果审计

S. Gendy
{"title":"非鼻特异性评分在术后Snot22问卷调查中的效果审计","authors":"S. Gendy","doi":"10.29328/JOURNAL.ATED.1001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT22) has been widely adopted in clinical practice and has been declared as the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system. It is simple disease specific encompassing 22 symptoms reflecting health burden of the rhino- logical patients. Each item quantifies symptoms severity from 0(no problem) to 5 (worst symptom). The sum of each item results in a maximum score of 110.High score indicates poor outcome.","PeriodicalId":79680,"journal":{"name":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","volume":"462 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit of the Effect of Non-Nasal Specific Scoring On the Postoperative Snot22 Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"S. Gendy\",\"doi\":\"10.29328/JOURNAL.ATED.1001010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT22) has been widely adopted in clinical practice and has been declared as the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system. It is simple disease specific encompassing 22 symptoms reflecting health burden of the rhino- logical patients. Each item quantifies symptoms severity from 0(no problem) to 5 (worst symptom). The sum of each item results in a maximum score of 110.High score indicates poor outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"462 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29328/JOURNAL.ATED.1001010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/JOURNAL.ATED.1001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻内镜结果测试(SNOT22)已被广泛应用于临床实践,并被认为是最合适的鼻内镜结果评分系统。它是一种简单的疾病特异性,包括22种症状,反映了犀牛患者的健康负担。每个项目量化症状的严重程度,从0(没有问题)到5(最严重的症状)。每个项目的总和最高可得110分。得分高表明结果差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audit of the Effect of Non-Nasal Specific Scoring On the Postoperative Snot22 Questionnaire
The Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT22) has been widely adopted in clinical practice and has been declared as the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system. It is simple disease specific encompassing 22 symptoms reflecting health burden of the rhino- logical patients. Each item quantifies symptoms severity from 0(no problem) to 5 (worst symptom). The sum of each item results in a maximum score of 110.High score indicates poor outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congenital Tracheoesophageal Fistula Presenting in an Asymptomatic Adult- A Case Report Factors Contributing To Clinic No-Show at a Safety Net Hospital How Can We Best Manage Patients With Oligometastatic Disease In Head And Neck Cancer? Sinister growth behind the ear: how can a person be sloppy and shoddy??? A Systematic Review of the Auditory and Vestibular Effects of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1