皮肤刮擦试验:一种廉价和无痛的皮肤试验,用于识别儿童和成人的即时过敏

C. Olivier, Daiana Guedes Pinto Argentão, R. A. P. G. Santos, Mariana Dias da Silva, R. P. S. Lima, R. L. Zollner
{"title":"皮肤刮擦试验:一种廉价和无痛的皮肤试验,用于识别儿童和成人的即时过敏","authors":"C. Olivier, Daiana Guedes Pinto Argentão, R. A. P. G. Santos, Mariana Dias da Silva, R. P. S. Lima, R. L. Zollner","doi":"10.2174/1874838401306010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Skin testing is a mainstay in allergology, and its importance is increasing in several fields. The ability to choose the most suitable technique according to the clinical setting is an advantage for the medical team. Objectives: To describe in detail an alternative technique of the coetaneous allergy test (skin scrape test) conceived as a variation of the former skin scratch test; to evaluate its value as a tool for diagnosis of immune sensitization; and to com- pare its accuracy with the skin prick test. Methods: The skin scrape test and skin prick test were performed side by side with the same allergen extracts in 162 hu- man subjects classified in two groups according to the known presence or absence of serum specific-IgE to these aller- gens. Results: The sensitivity of the skin scrape test to detect immediate reactions was 85.0%. The sensitivity of the skin prick test was 86.5%. The sensitivity of both techniques analyzed together as a unique procedure was 94.2%. The specificity of the skin scrape test was 90.1%.The specificity of the skin prick test was 72.9%.The specificity of both tests analyzed to- gether as a unique procedure was 70.5%. Conclusions: The skin scrape test is an alternative and complementary technique for allergic skin testing, and it is able to detect IgE-specific immune sensitization without the disadvantages of the skin scratch test. The skin scrape test has simi- lar outcomes to the skin prick test.","PeriodicalId":22835,"journal":{"name":"The Open Allergy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin Scrape Test: An Inexpensive and Painless Skin Test For Recognition Of Immediate Hypersensitivity In Children And Adults\",\"authors\":\"C. Olivier, Daiana Guedes Pinto Argentão, R. A. P. G. Santos, Mariana Dias da Silva, R. P. S. Lima, R. L. Zollner\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874838401306010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Skin testing is a mainstay in allergology, and its importance is increasing in several fields. The ability to choose the most suitable technique according to the clinical setting is an advantage for the medical team. Objectives: To describe in detail an alternative technique of the coetaneous allergy test (skin scrape test) conceived as a variation of the former skin scratch test; to evaluate its value as a tool for diagnosis of immune sensitization; and to com- pare its accuracy with the skin prick test. Methods: The skin scrape test and skin prick test were performed side by side with the same allergen extracts in 162 hu- man subjects classified in two groups according to the known presence or absence of serum specific-IgE to these aller- gens. Results: The sensitivity of the skin scrape test to detect immediate reactions was 85.0%. The sensitivity of the skin prick test was 86.5%. The sensitivity of both techniques analyzed together as a unique procedure was 94.2%. The specificity of the skin scrape test was 90.1%.The specificity of the skin prick test was 72.9%.The specificity of both tests analyzed to- gether as a unique procedure was 70.5%. Conclusions: The skin scrape test is an alternative and complementary technique for allergic skin testing, and it is able to detect IgE-specific immune sensitization without the disadvantages of the skin scratch test. The skin scrape test has simi- lar outcomes to the skin prick test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Allergy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Allergy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401306010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Allergy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401306010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:皮肤试验是过敏症学的主要手段,其重要性在几个领域日益增加。能够根据临床情况选择最合适的技术是医疗团队的优势。目的:详细描述一种皮肤过敏试验(皮肤刮伤试验)的替代技术,作为以前皮肤刮伤试验的一种变化;评价其作为免疫致敏诊断工具的价值;并将其与皮肤点刺试验的准确性进行比较。方法:将162例受试者根据血清中是否存在对这些过敏原的特异性ige分为两组,同时对相同的过敏原提取物进行皮肤刮擦试验和皮肤点刺试验。结果:刮皮试验对即刻反应的敏感性为85.0%。皮肤点刺试验敏感性为86.5%。两种技术作为一种独特的方法一起分析的灵敏度为94.2%。皮肤刮擦试验的特异性为90.1%。皮肤点刺试验特异性为72.9%。作为一种独特的方法,这两种测试的特异性为70.5%。结论:皮肤刮擦试验是过敏性皮肤试验的一种替代和补充技术,能够检测ige特异性免疫致敏,且没有皮肤刮擦试验的缺点。皮肤刮擦试验与皮肤点刺试验的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Skin Scrape Test: An Inexpensive and Painless Skin Test For Recognition Of Immediate Hypersensitivity In Children And Adults
Background: Skin testing is a mainstay in allergology, and its importance is increasing in several fields. The ability to choose the most suitable technique according to the clinical setting is an advantage for the medical team. Objectives: To describe in detail an alternative technique of the coetaneous allergy test (skin scrape test) conceived as a variation of the former skin scratch test; to evaluate its value as a tool for diagnosis of immune sensitization; and to com- pare its accuracy with the skin prick test. Methods: The skin scrape test and skin prick test were performed side by side with the same allergen extracts in 162 hu- man subjects classified in two groups according to the known presence or absence of serum specific-IgE to these aller- gens. Results: The sensitivity of the skin scrape test to detect immediate reactions was 85.0%. The sensitivity of the skin prick test was 86.5%. The sensitivity of both techniques analyzed together as a unique procedure was 94.2%. The specificity of the skin scrape test was 90.1%.The specificity of the skin prick test was 72.9%.The specificity of both tests analyzed to- gether as a unique procedure was 70.5%. Conclusions: The skin scrape test is an alternative and complementary technique for allergic skin testing, and it is able to detect IgE-specific immune sensitization without the disadvantages of the skin scratch test. The skin scrape test has simi- lar outcomes to the skin prick test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) are Risk Factors for Cryptococcosis Association Between Endoscopic, Radiologic and Patient-reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitudes Among School Teachers in Jazan, Saudi Arabia Anaphylaxis to Glatiramer Acetate Dynamics of Plasma and Granule Membrane in Murine Bone Marrow- Derived Mast Cells after Re-stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1