埃塞俄比亚Abbay盆地Bechet流域番茄部分养分平衡灌溉调度策略评价

N. Assefa
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Abbay盆地Bechet流域番茄部分养分平衡灌溉调度策略评价","authors":"N. Assefa","doi":"10.7176/cer/12-10-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reasonable and efficient utilization of the water and soil resources are viable so as to maximize the production and productivity of the farm land. Unwise utilization of those two most critical resources results on the decline of production and productivity. Managing irrigation water delivered to the irrigation field could able to increase the yield by controlling the nutrient flow system in the soil media. The objective of this study is to evaluate the different water management methods on yield maximization by providing a great attention to the partial nutrient balance system. The study have a brief on the quantification of irrigation water required to a given plot by following technical approach of continues soil moisture measurement using sensor device Time Domain reflect meter (TDR) and through the use of 10 years back climatic historical data from Bahir Dar weather station data. The usual farmers practice have become evaluated and compared with the technical management methods in terms of water demand at each plot and partial nutrient balance pattern. To achieve the comparison, the experimental plots were prepared and grouped in to the three categories. The comparison result shows that usual farmers practice have used more water for some plots and less water for some plots not matching exactly on the requirement level of the crop; less crop yield and more positive partial N balance and negative P and K balance other than the technical management methods. The average partial Nitrogen (N)depletion balance for TDR, CWR,FARM were,-90.6 kg/ha, -151.3 kg/ha and 18.8 kg/ha ; Phosphorus (P) depletion balance were -0.6 kg/ha, -0.5 kg/ha, and – 0.2 kg/ha and potassium(K) depletion balance were; -284 kg/ha ,-270 kg/ha and -97.2 kg/ha respectively. The Average crop yield was 33.2 Mg ha-1; 31.67 Mg ha-1; 20.8 Mg ha-1 for CWR; TDR; and FARM water management groups respectively. The respective average water consumption of CWR, TDR and FARM were 590 mm, 476 mm and 575 mm respectively. Keywords: TDR, WFD, CWR, FARM, Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2020","PeriodicalId":10219,"journal":{"name":"Civil and environmental research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Irrigation Scheduling Strategies on Partial Nutrient Balance for Tomato Production at Bechet Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"N. Assefa\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/cer/12-10-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reasonable and efficient utilization of the water and soil resources are viable so as to maximize the production and productivity of the farm land. Unwise utilization of those two most critical resources results on the decline of production and productivity. Managing irrigation water delivered to the irrigation field could able to increase the yield by controlling the nutrient flow system in the soil media. The objective of this study is to evaluate the different water management methods on yield maximization by providing a great attention to the partial nutrient balance system. The study have a brief on the quantification of irrigation water required to a given plot by following technical approach of continues soil moisture measurement using sensor device Time Domain reflect meter (TDR) and through the use of 10 years back climatic historical data from Bahir Dar weather station data. The usual farmers practice have become evaluated and compared with the technical management methods in terms of water demand at each plot and partial nutrient balance pattern. To achieve the comparison, the experimental plots were prepared and grouped in to the three categories. The comparison result shows that usual farmers practice have used more water for some plots and less water for some plots not matching exactly on the requirement level of the crop; less crop yield and more positive partial N balance and negative P and K balance other than the technical management methods. The average partial Nitrogen (N)depletion balance for TDR, CWR,FARM were,-90.6 kg/ha, -151.3 kg/ha and 18.8 kg/ha ; Phosphorus (P) depletion balance were -0.6 kg/ha, -0.5 kg/ha, and – 0.2 kg/ha and potassium(K) depletion balance were; -284 kg/ha ,-270 kg/ha and -97.2 kg/ha respectively. The Average crop yield was 33.2 Mg ha-1; 31.67 Mg ha-1; 20.8 Mg ha-1 for CWR; TDR; and FARM water management groups respectively. The respective average water consumption of CWR, TDR and FARM were 590 mm, 476 mm and 575 mm respectively. Keywords: TDR, WFD, CWR, FARM, Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":10219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil and environmental research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil and environmental research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/cer/12-10-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/cer/12-10-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合理、高效地利用水土资源,最大限度地提高耕地的产量和生产力是可行的。不明智地利用这两种最关键的资源会导致产量和生产率的下降。对灌溉水进行管理,可以通过控制土壤介质中的养分流动系统来提高产量。本研究的目的是通过对部分营养平衡系统的重视,评价不同的水分管理方法对产量最大化的影响。该研究简要介绍了通过使用传感器设备时域反射仪(TDR)和使用Bahir Dar气象站数据的10年前气候历史数据,采用连续土壤湿度测量技术方法对给定地块所需灌溉水量的量化。从每个小区的需水量和部分养分平衡模式的角度,对农户的常规做法与技术管理方法进行了评价和比较。为了进行比较,准备了试验田,并将其分为三类。比较结果表明,农户的常规做法是在某些地块多用水,而在与作物需要量不完全匹配的地块少用水;与技术管理方法相比,作物产量较低,部分氮平衡较正,部分磷钾平衡较负。TDR、CWR、FARM的平均氮耗平衡分别为-90.6 kg/ha、-151.3 kg/ha和18.8 kg/ha;磷(P)耗竭平衡分别为-0.6 kg/ha、-0.5 kg/ha和- 0.2 kg/ha,钾(K)耗竭平衡;-284公斤/公顷、-270公斤/公顷和-97.2公斤/公顷。平均产量为33.2 Mg ha-1;31.67 Mg ha-1;CWR为20.8 Mg ha-1;热带病研究和培训特别规划;和FARM水管理组。CWR、TDR和FARM的平均耗水量分别为590 mm、476 mm和575 mm。关键词:TDR, WFD, CWR, FARM,氮,磷,钾。出版日期:2020年10月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Irrigation Scheduling Strategies on Partial Nutrient Balance for Tomato Production at Bechet Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia
Reasonable and efficient utilization of the water and soil resources are viable so as to maximize the production and productivity of the farm land. Unwise utilization of those two most critical resources results on the decline of production and productivity. Managing irrigation water delivered to the irrigation field could able to increase the yield by controlling the nutrient flow system in the soil media. The objective of this study is to evaluate the different water management methods on yield maximization by providing a great attention to the partial nutrient balance system. The study have a brief on the quantification of irrigation water required to a given plot by following technical approach of continues soil moisture measurement using sensor device Time Domain reflect meter (TDR) and through the use of 10 years back climatic historical data from Bahir Dar weather station data. The usual farmers practice have become evaluated and compared with the technical management methods in terms of water demand at each plot and partial nutrient balance pattern. To achieve the comparison, the experimental plots were prepared and grouped in to the three categories. The comparison result shows that usual farmers practice have used more water for some plots and less water for some plots not matching exactly on the requirement level of the crop; less crop yield and more positive partial N balance and negative P and K balance other than the technical management methods. The average partial Nitrogen (N)depletion balance for TDR, CWR,FARM were,-90.6 kg/ha, -151.3 kg/ha and 18.8 kg/ha ; Phosphorus (P) depletion balance were -0.6 kg/ha, -0.5 kg/ha, and – 0.2 kg/ha and potassium(K) depletion balance were; -284 kg/ha ,-270 kg/ha and -97.2 kg/ha respectively. The Average crop yield was 33.2 Mg ha-1; 31.67 Mg ha-1; 20.8 Mg ha-1 for CWR; TDR; and FARM water management groups respectively. The respective average water consumption of CWR, TDR and FARM were 590 mm, 476 mm and 575 mm respectively. Keywords: TDR, WFD, CWR, FARM, Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavior of Normal Concrete Beam with PCC During the Moisture Curing Period Soil Stabilization Experimentation with Natura l Pozzolana for Cost Effective Road Construction Projects in Tanzania Comparative Analysis of Facilities Management Strategies for Sustainable Development in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions Affordable Strategy for Using Local Materials in Building:A Case Study of Housing the Urban Poor in Nigeria Potential Assessment of Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme by Using Internal and External Indicators: Case Study on Kokono Small Scale Irrigation Scheme, North Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1