柔性BPMN与CMMN在实践中的比较——以构件发布过程为例

André Zensen, J. Küster
{"title":"柔性BPMN与CMMN在实践中的比较——以构件发布过程为例","authors":"André Zensen, J. Küster","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Object Management Group maintains two notations to model business processes, BPMN and CMMN. While the two follow different approaches, both offer structures to model flexible processes or parts thereof. This gives rise to the question which standard should be chosen to adequately model such processes. We compare BPMN with a focus on its ad-hoc sub-process with elements of CMMN case models along a practical case study. While BPMN offers a certain degree of flexibility, CMMN has several benefits but also drawbacks. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of both notations. To answer the question of which notation to use for modeling flexible processes, we derive simple guidelines to help in making an informed choice.","PeriodicalId":6544,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes\",\"authors\":\"André Zensen, J. Küster\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Object Management Group maintains two notations to model business processes, BPMN and CMMN. While the two follow different approaches, both offer structures to model flexible processes or parts thereof. This gives rise to the question which standard should be chosen to adequately model such processes. We compare BPMN with a focus on its ad-hoc sub-process with elements of CMMN case models along a practical case study. While BPMN offers a certain degree of flexibility, CMMN has several benefits but also drawbacks. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of both notations. To answer the question of which notation to use for modeling flexible processes, we derive simple guidelines to help in making an informed choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

对象管理组维护两种符号来建模业务流程:BPMN和CMMN。虽然两者采用不同的方法,但都提供了对灵活流程或其部分建模的结构。这就产生了应该选择哪种标准来充分模拟这些过程的问题。我们将BPMN与CMMN案例模型的元素进行比较,重点关注其特设子流程,并进行实际案例研究。虽然BPMN提供了一定程度的灵活性,但CMMN有几个优点,但也有缺点。我们将讨论这两种符号的优缺点。为了回答使用哪种表示法对灵活过程建模的问题,我们推导了一些简单的指导原则,以帮助您做出明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Flexible BPMN and CMMN in Practice: A Case Study on Component Release Processes
The Object Management Group maintains two notations to model business processes, BPMN and CMMN. While the two follow different approaches, both offer structures to model flexible processes or parts thereof. This gives rise to the question which standard should be chosen to adequately model such processes. We compare BPMN with a focus on its ad-hoc sub-process with elements of CMMN case models along a practical case study. While BPMN offers a certain degree of flexibility, CMMN has several benefits but also drawbacks. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of both notations. To answer the question of which notation to use for modeling flexible processes, we derive simple guidelines to help in making an informed choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MARTSIA: Enabling Data Confidentiality for Blockchain-based Process Execution A Multi-level Cyber-Security Reference Model in Support of Vulnerability Analysis Shape Your Process: Discovering Declarative Business Processes from Positive and Negative Traces Taking into Account User Preferences Semi-automated Test Migration for BPMN-Based Process-Driven Applications Interoperability of Digital Government Services: A Brazilian Reference Architecture Model to Promote Communication, Management, and Reuse of Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1