道路隧道火灾烟气层高度的确定方法

Jin Kaiyan, Li Zhisheng, Li Tao
{"title":"道路隧道火灾烟气层高度的确定方法","authors":"Jin Kaiyan, Li Zhisheng, Li Tao","doi":"10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buoyancy frequency methodꎬ N percentage methodꎬ integral ratio methodꎬ are three common methods to determine smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ the calculations of three methods are often biased from visual observations. In order to study and explain deviations of calculation results from visual observationsꎬ which were found in three common determination methods of smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ a long tunnel model was established based on FDSꎬ and six types of fire source power were set. Thenꎬ vertical visibility distribution was used to verify deviation between existing determination method and visual results before visibility mutation method was proposed. The results show that the deviation calculated from above four methods ranks as visibility mutation method (1􀆰 63%) < buoyancy frequency method (4􀆰 88%) < N percentage method (N= 30ꎬ 7􀆰 88%) < integral ratio method (8􀆰 50%)ꎬ among which results of integral ratio and buoyancy frequency method are higher than visual ones. It is also found that visibility value in vertical direction of tunnel remains constant and then decreases abruptly as the height increasesꎬ and the greater fire power isꎬ the faster it declinesꎬ and the lower visibility value there is.","PeriodicalId":9976,"journal":{"name":"中国安全科学学报","volume":"11 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination method of smoke layer height in road tunnel fire\",\"authors\":\"Jin Kaiyan, Li Zhisheng, Li Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Buoyancy frequency methodꎬ N percentage methodꎬ integral ratio methodꎬ are three common methods to determine smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ the calculations of three methods are often biased from visual observations. In order to study and explain deviations of calculation results from visual observationsꎬ which were found in three common determination methods of smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ a long tunnel model was established based on FDSꎬ and six types of fire source power were set. Thenꎬ vertical visibility distribution was used to verify deviation between existing determination method and visual results before visibility mutation method was proposed. The results show that the deviation calculated from above four methods ranks as visibility mutation method (1􀆰 63%) < buoyancy frequency method (4􀆰 88%) < N percentage method (N= 30ꎬ 7􀆰 88%) < integral ratio method (8􀆰 50%)ꎬ among which results of integral ratio and buoyancy frequency method are higher than visual ones. It is also found that visibility value in vertical direction of tunnel remains constant and then decreases abruptly as the height increasesꎬ and the greater fire power isꎬ the faster it declinesꎬ and the lower visibility value there is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国安全科学学报\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国安全科学学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国安全科学学报","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

浮力频率法ꎬN百分比法ꎬ积分比法ꎬ是确定隧道火灾烟气层高度的三种常用方法ꎬ三种方法的计算往往存在目测偏差。为了研究和解释三种常用的隧道火灾烟层高度确定方法中目视观测计算结果ꎬ存在的偏差ꎬ,建立了基于FDS的长隧道模型ꎬ,并设置了六种火源功率。然后利用ꎬ垂直能见度分布验证现有确定方法与视觉结果的偏差,提出能见度突变方法。结果表明,四种方法的计算偏差大小依次为:能见度突变法(1􀆰63%)<浮力频率法(4􀆰88%)< N百分比法(N= 30ꎬ7􀆰88%)<积分比法(8􀆰50%)ꎬ,其中积分比法和浮力频率法的计算结果均高于目标法。巷道垂直方向的能见度值随高度的增加先保持不变,然后突然下降ꎬ,火力越大ꎬ下降越快ꎬ,能见度值越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination method of smoke layer height in road tunnel fire
Buoyancy frequency methodꎬ N percentage methodꎬ integral ratio methodꎬ are three common methods to determine smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ the calculations of three methods are often biased from visual observations. In order to study and explain deviations of calculation results from visual observationsꎬ which were found in three common determination methods of smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ a long tunnel model was established based on FDSꎬ and six types of fire source power were set. Thenꎬ vertical visibility distribution was used to verify deviation between existing determination method and visual results before visibility mutation method was proposed. The results show that the deviation calculated from above four methods ranks as visibility mutation method (1􀆰 63%) < buoyancy frequency method (4􀆰 88%) < N percentage method (N= 30ꎬ 7􀆰 88%) < integral ratio method (8􀆰 50%)ꎬ among which results of integral ratio and buoyancy frequency method are higher than visual ones. It is also found that visibility value in vertical direction of tunnel remains constant and then decreases abruptly as the height increasesꎬ and the greater fire power isꎬ the faster it declinesꎬ and the lower visibility value there is.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8733
期刊介绍: China Safety Science Journal is administered by China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by China Occupational Safety and Health Association (formerly China Society of Science and Technology for Labor Protection). It was first published on January 20, 1991 and was approved for public distribution at home and abroad. China Safety Science Journal (CN 11-2865/X ISSN 1003-3033 CODEN ZAKXAM) is a monthly magazine, 12 issues a year, large 16 folo, the domestic price of each book is 40.00 yuan, the annual price is 480.00 yuan. Mailing code 82-454. Honors: Scopus database includes journals in the field of safety science of high-quality scientific journals classification catalog T1 level National Chinese core journals China Science and technology core journals CSCD journals The United States "Chemical Abstracts" search included the United States "Cambridge Scientific Abstracts: Materials Information" search included
期刊最新文献
Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field Characterization and assessment of safety situation for regional railway transportation Effective extraction radius of gas drilling in coal seam Scenario analysis of stampede accidents in scenic spots A proposed model and application for pedestrian evacuation time calculation in road tunnels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1