得分方式和数量优势对优秀青少年足球运动员体能需求的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES European Journal of Human Movement Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.21134/EURJHM.2021.46.616
J. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. Raya-González, Daniel Castillo, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Mario Sánchez, A. Rodríguez-Fernández, F. Nakamura
{"title":"得分方式和数量优势对优秀青少年足球运动员体能需求的影响","authors":"J. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. Raya-González, Daniel Castillo, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Mario Sánchez, A. Rodríguez-Fernández, F. Nakamura","doi":"10.21134/EURJHM.2021.46.616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small-sided games (SSGs) are a useful strategy to optimize the training process in soccer. The modification of some variables simultaneously implies several physical adaptations in soccer players. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the differences in the physical demands encountered by soccer players in different SSGs formats focusing on the scoring methods (i.e., mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers) and to the numerical superiority situations (i.e., no superiority, variable superiority, and fixed superiority). Eight elite young soccer players from the same team (age: 17.9 ± 1.1 years) randomly completed six SSG formats. Physical parameters (i.e., total distance [TD], distance covered at different speeds [D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6], and distance covered accelerating [ACC] and decelerating [DEC]) were collected. The main results showed that the variable superiority (i.e., 4vs4+1) situation is more demanding, in terms of TD and distance covered at D3 and D4, in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) situations both SSGs played with mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers. Besides, higher physical demands were registered in fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) than in no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation. Finally, only in a no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation higher distances at D1 and D5 were registered during the SSG played with mini-goals but higher distance at D3 was covered in the SSG format with regular goals and goalkeepers. Playing SSGs in variable superiority situation is more demanding in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority situations both during those SSGs played with mini-goals and/or regular goals and goalkeepers. In addition, SSGs played with mini-goals induced higher physical demands than playing with regular goals and goalkeepers during no superiority games. These findings could be useful for coaches in order to periodize the training drills within the microcycle to modulate the training session intensity.","PeriodicalId":36150,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Movement","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of scoring methods and numerical superiority on physical demands in elite young soccer players\",\"authors\":\"J. Sánchez-Sánchez, J. Raya-González, Daniel Castillo, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Mario Sánchez, A. Rodríguez-Fernández, F. Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.21134/EURJHM.2021.46.616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small-sided games (SSGs) are a useful strategy to optimize the training process in soccer. The modification of some variables simultaneously implies several physical adaptations in soccer players. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the differences in the physical demands encountered by soccer players in different SSGs formats focusing on the scoring methods (i.e., mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers) and to the numerical superiority situations (i.e., no superiority, variable superiority, and fixed superiority). Eight elite young soccer players from the same team (age: 17.9 ± 1.1 years) randomly completed six SSG formats. Physical parameters (i.e., total distance [TD], distance covered at different speeds [D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6], and distance covered accelerating [ACC] and decelerating [DEC]) were collected. The main results showed that the variable superiority (i.e., 4vs4+1) situation is more demanding, in terms of TD and distance covered at D3 and D4, in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) situations both SSGs played with mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers. Besides, higher physical demands were registered in fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) than in no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation. Finally, only in a no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation higher distances at D1 and D5 were registered during the SSG played with mini-goals but higher distance at D3 was covered in the SSG format with regular goals and goalkeepers. Playing SSGs in variable superiority situation is more demanding in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority situations both during those SSGs played with mini-goals and/or regular goals and goalkeepers. In addition, SSGs played with mini-goals induced higher physical demands than playing with regular goals and goalkeepers during no superiority games. These findings could be useful for coaches in order to periodize the training drills within the microcycle to modulate the training session intensity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Human Movement\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Human Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21134/EURJHM.2021.46.616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/EURJHM.2021.46.616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

小边比赛是优化足球训练过程的一种有效策略。一些变量的改变同时意味着足球运动员的几种身体适应。因此,本研究的目的是分析不同ssg形式下足球运动员身体需求的差异,重点关注得分方式(即小进球和有守门员的常规进球)和数量优势情况(即无优势、可变优势和固定优势)。来自同一球队的8名优秀青年足球运动员(年龄:17.9±1.1岁)随机完成6项SSG赛制。采集物理参数,即总距离[TD],不同速度下的距离[D1、D2、D3、D4、D5、D6],加速和减速时的距离[ACC]和减速时的距离[DEC]。主要结果表明,与无优势(即4vs4)和固定优势(即5vs4)情况相比,可变优势(即4vs4+1)情况下的防守距离和D3和D4的覆盖距离要求更高。此外,在固定优势(即5vs4)的情况下,身体需求比在无优势(即4vs4)的情况下更高。最后,只有在无优势(即4vs4)的情况下,D1和D5的距离在使用小球门的SSG中被记录下来,而D3的距离在使用常规球门和守门员的SSG格式中被记录下来。在可变优势情况下玩ssg比没有优势(即4vs4)和固定优势情况下玩ssg更苛刻,无论是在小目标还是常规目标和守门员的情况下玩ssg。此外,在没有优势的比赛中,与常规目标和守门员相比,使用小目标的ssg对身体的要求更高。这些发现可以帮助教练在微周期内进行周期性训练,以调节训练强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of scoring methods and numerical superiority on physical demands in elite young soccer players
Small-sided games (SSGs) are a useful strategy to optimize the training process in soccer. The modification of some variables simultaneously implies several physical adaptations in soccer players. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the differences in the physical demands encountered by soccer players in different SSGs formats focusing on the scoring methods (i.e., mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers) and to the numerical superiority situations (i.e., no superiority, variable superiority, and fixed superiority). Eight elite young soccer players from the same team (age: 17.9 ± 1.1 years) randomly completed six SSG formats. Physical parameters (i.e., total distance [TD], distance covered at different speeds [D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6], and distance covered accelerating [ACC] and decelerating [DEC]) were collected. The main results showed that the variable superiority (i.e., 4vs4+1) situation is more demanding, in terms of TD and distance covered at D3 and D4, in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) situations both SSGs played with mini-goals and regular goals with goalkeepers. Besides, higher physical demands were registered in fixed superiority (i.e., 5vs4) than in no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation. Finally, only in a no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) situation higher distances at D1 and D5 were registered during the SSG played with mini-goals but higher distance at D3 was covered in the SSG format with regular goals and goalkeepers. Playing SSGs in variable superiority situation is more demanding in comparison to no superiority (i.e., 4vs4) and fixed superiority situations both during those SSGs played with mini-goals and/or regular goals and goalkeepers. In addition, SSGs played with mini-goals induced higher physical demands than playing with regular goals and goalkeepers during no superiority games. These findings could be useful for coaches in order to periodize the training drills within the microcycle to modulate the training session intensity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Movement
European Journal of Human Movement Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of a Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching System Using a Low-Speed, High-Torque Motor Women can transfer their ability to cope with stress from sport to academic contexts Technical And Internal Load Responses in 3-A-Side Full-Court Basketball Games: The Effects of Coaches' Verbal Feedback The tense or constricted mind Comparison of Physical And Physiological Profiles Between Elite Freestyle Men And Women Wrestlers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1