与成瘾专家的最后一次对话*

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2022-11-13 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2022.2144262
B. Alexander
{"title":"与成瘾专家的最后一次对话*","authors":"B. Alexander","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2144262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This ‘think piece’ summarizes the final conclusions of an alarmed addiction researcher and theorist who, at the end of his professional life, sees an urgent need for change in both the research paradigm and the social role of addiction professionals. Not only can our profession help addicted individuals more effectively, we can also help to extricate society from its current polarized, embittered, and precarious state. The five key points of the article are: (1) addiction theory is currently bogged down and stuck, (2) We are stuck partly because of the ineradicable remnants of the Myth of the Demon Drug that has haunted our field of study from its beginnings, (3) A radical paradigm shift to an ‘adaptive’ paradigm can re-vitalize our work, (4) We are currently ignoring the addictions that constitute the greatest danger to society, and (5) The proposed paradigm shift, along with a recognition of the traditional meaning of addiction in the English language, will open up our field to fresh research questions and an expanded role in addressing the terrifying dangers of our times.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A final conversation with addiction professionals*\",\"authors\":\"B. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16066359.2022.2144262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This ‘think piece’ summarizes the final conclusions of an alarmed addiction researcher and theorist who, at the end of his professional life, sees an urgent need for change in both the research paradigm and the social role of addiction professionals. Not only can our profession help addicted individuals more effectively, we can also help to extricate society from its current polarized, embittered, and precarious state. The five key points of the article are: (1) addiction theory is currently bogged down and stuck, (2) We are stuck partly because of the ineradicable remnants of the Myth of the Demon Drug that has haunted our field of study from its beginnings, (3) A radical paradigm shift to an ‘adaptive’ paradigm can re-vitalize our work, (4) We are currently ignoring the addictions that constitute the greatest danger to society, and (5) The proposed paradigm shift, along with a recognition of the traditional meaning of addiction in the English language, will open up our field to fresh research questions and an expanded role in addressing the terrifying dangers of our times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Research & Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Research & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2144262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2144262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇“思考文章”总结了一位惊慌失措的成瘾研究者和理论家的最终结论,在他职业生涯的最后,他看到了研究范式和成瘾专业人员的社会角色迫切需要改变。我们的职业不仅可以更有效地帮助成瘾者,我们还可以帮助社会摆脱目前两极分化、痛苦和不稳定的状态。文章的五个重点是:(1)成瘾理论目前陷入了困境,(2)我们陷入困境的部分原因是,从一开始就困扰着我们研究领域的恶魔药物神话的不可磨灭的残余,(3)向“适应性”范式的激进转变可以重新激活我们的工作,(4)我们目前忽视了对社会构成最大危险的成瘾,(5)提出的范式转变,再加上对“成瘾”一词在英语中的传统含义的认可,将为我们的领域开辟新的研究问题,并在应对我们这个时代的可怕危险方面发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A final conversation with addiction professionals*
Abstract This ‘think piece’ summarizes the final conclusions of an alarmed addiction researcher and theorist who, at the end of his professional life, sees an urgent need for change in both the research paradigm and the social role of addiction professionals. Not only can our profession help addicted individuals more effectively, we can also help to extricate society from its current polarized, embittered, and precarious state. The five key points of the article are: (1) addiction theory is currently bogged down and stuck, (2) We are stuck partly because of the ineradicable remnants of the Myth of the Demon Drug that has haunted our field of study from its beginnings, (3) A radical paradigm shift to an ‘adaptive’ paradigm can re-vitalize our work, (4) We are currently ignoring the addictions that constitute the greatest danger to society, and (5) The proposed paradigm shift, along with a recognition of the traditional meaning of addiction in the English language, will open up our field to fresh research questions and an expanded role in addressing the terrifying dangers of our times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1