草甘膦41% SL对葡萄园杂草的生物药效和植物毒性评价

S. D. Ramteke, A. Gavali, S. M. Khalate, A. Langote
{"title":"草甘膦41% SL对葡萄园杂草的生物药效和植物毒性评价","authors":"S. D. Ramteke, A. Gavali, S. M. Khalate, A. Langote","doi":"10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i830230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was evaluated for the bio- efficacy and phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL against the complex weed flora in grapevines. The experiment was carried out at ICAR- NRC Grapes, Pune with seven treatments replicated thrice. The treatments were imposed at 3-4 leaf stage of weeds in vineyards. All the weed population were niformly distributed in vineyards.  All the treatments significantly reduced weed density over untreated control. The highest weed density was recorded with untreated control while, the negligible weed density was recorded in hand weeding followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha at 15th, 30th, 45th Days after application. Least dry weight (g/m2) as recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, the maximum dry weight of weed (g/m2) was recorded with untreated control at 45th Days after application.  Highest weed control efficacy (%) was recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, negligible weed control efficacy (%) Was recorded with untreated control. The highest yield (kg/vines) was recorded with hand weeding treatments followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000. The highest benefit: cost ratio was recorded in the treatment Glyphosate 41 % SL (4000 ml/ha) (1:1.99), while least in control treatment (1:1.77). Applications of Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha in grapevines showed highest weed control efficacy (%) and yield per vine (kg/vine) in this investigation.","PeriodicalId":15023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Bio - Efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL against Weed Flora in Grape Vineyards\",\"authors\":\"S. D. Ramteke, A. Gavali, S. M. Khalate, A. Langote\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i830230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study was evaluated for the bio- efficacy and phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL against the complex weed flora in grapevines. The experiment was carried out at ICAR- NRC Grapes, Pune with seven treatments replicated thrice. The treatments were imposed at 3-4 leaf stage of weeds in vineyards. All the weed population were niformly distributed in vineyards.  All the treatments significantly reduced weed density over untreated control. The highest weed density was recorded with untreated control while, the negligible weed density was recorded in hand weeding followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha at 15th, 30th, 45th Days after application. Least dry weight (g/m2) as recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, the maximum dry weight of weed (g/m2) was recorded with untreated control at 45th Days after application.  Highest weed control efficacy (%) was recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, negligible weed control efficacy (%) Was recorded with untreated control. The highest yield (kg/vines) was recorded with hand weeding treatments followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000. The highest benefit: cost ratio was recorded in the treatment Glyphosate 41 % SL (4000 ml/ha) (1:1.99), while least in control treatment (1:1.77). Applications of Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha in grapevines showed highest weed control efficacy (%) and yield per vine (kg/vine) in this investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i830230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i830230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了草甘膦41% SL对葡萄植株复杂杂草的生物药效和植物毒性。试验在浦那ICAR- NRC葡萄中心进行,7个处理重复3次。施用于葡萄园杂草的3-4叶期。所有杂草种群在葡萄园内分布均匀。与未处理对照相比,所有处理均显著降低了杂草密度。在施用后第15、30、45天,用草甘膦41% SL @ 4000 ml/ha进行手动除草,杂草密度可忽略不计。草甘膦41% SL @ 4000 ml/ha记录了最小干重(g/m2),随后草甘膦41% SL @ 3000 ml/ha记录了最大干重(g/m2),而未处理对照在施用后第45天记录了最大干重(g/m2)。草甘膦41% SL @ 4000 ml/ha的杂草防治效果最高(%),其次是草甘膦41% SL @ 3000 ml/ha的杂草防治效果,而未经处理的杂草防治效果可以忽略不计(%)。最高产量(公斤/株)记录为手动除草处理,然后使用草甘膦41% SL @ 4000。草甘膦41% SL (4000 ml/ha)处理的效益:成本比最高(1:1.99),而对照处理的效益:成本比最低(1:1.77)。在本研究中,在葡萄藤上施用41% SL @ 4000 ml/ha的草甘膦显示出最高的杂草防治效果(%)和单株产量(kg/株)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Bio - Efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL against Weed Flora in Grape Vineyards
The study was evaluated for the bio- efficacy and phytotoxicity of Glyphosate 41% SL against the complex weed flora in grapevines. The experiment was carried out at ICAR- NRC Grapes, Pune with seven treatments replicated thrice. The treatments were imposed at 3-4 leaf stage of weeds in vineyards. All the weed population were niformly distributed in vineyards.  All the treatments significantly reduced weed density over untreated control. The highest weed density was recorded with untreated control while, the negligible weed density was recorded in hand weeding followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha at 15th, 30th, 45th Days after application. Least dry weight (g/m2) as recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, the maximum dry weight of weed (g/m2) was recorded with untreated control at 45th Days after application.  Highest weed control efficacy (%) was recorded with Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 3000 ml/ha whereas, negligible weed control efficacy (%) Was recorded with untreated control. The highest yield (kg/vines) was recorded with hand weeding treatments followed by Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000. The highest benefit: cost ratio was recorded in the treatment Glyphosate 41 % SL (4000 ml/ha) (1:1.99), while least in control treatment (1:1.77). Applications of Glyphosate 41 % SL @ 4000 ml/ha in grapevines showed highest weed control efficacy (%) and yield per vine (kg/vine) in this investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization, a Potential Production, GC-MS and Characterization of Dark Green Pigment from New Local Isolate Streptomyces nigra Strain GH12 Determination of Zinc Concentration and Nutritional Value of Cow Hide (Ponmo) Sold in Different Parts of the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria Calibration of the DSSAT-CERES Wheat Crop Model under Scenarios of Climate Change Adaptation and Biotic Stress Improvement of Nutritional Properties of Attiéké by Co-Fermenting Cassava Paste with three Local Legume (Cowpea, Voandzou and Bean) Flours Structure and Dynamics of Granivorous Birds in Rice Fields Lowlands of the Yamoussoukro District, Central Côte d’Ivoire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1