双冲试验研究再生粗骨料混凝土抗拉强度

Hamed Hemmati Pourghashti, Rahmat Madandous, M. Ranjbar
{"title":"双冲试验研究再生粗骨料混凝土抗拉强度","authors":"Hamed Hemmati Pourghashti, Rahmat Madandous, M. Ranjbar","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2021.20395.1413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the recycled materials can be considered as a suitable solution for resolving environmental issues. The recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) can be utilized effectively in manufacturing structural concretes. Due to hardness and errors of direct tensile and splitting tensile tests, double -punch test (DPT) can be regarded as a reliable test method for evaluation of tensile strength.In this study, application of DPT was investigated as a less known method for RCA concretes considering effective factors, such as water–to-cement ratio (0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), maximum nominal size of RCA (10 and 19 mm), curing conditions (wet and dry), and replacement level of RCA (0, 50, and 100%) and the results were validated by direct tensile and splitting tensile test results. A statistical analysis was performed to indicate significance of each variable in DPT results of RCA concretes. Also, compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were assessed and their relationships with tensile strength of the specimens were studied.The maximum RCA size, replacement level of RCA, and mechanical properties were diminished in mixtures by increasing water-to-cement ratio. Generally, DPT results showed remarkable proximity to direct tensile test results with a slight increase. In wet curing condition, mean values of splitting tensile, DPT, and direct tensile tests in the specimens containing 19mm of RCA were 11.61, 10.06, and 9.44% higher than those containing 10mm of RCA, respectively. Moreover, results of statistical analysis showed that the studied factors had significant effects on the results and they must be regarded in evaluation of DPT.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying Tensile Strength of the Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete Using Double-Punch Test\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Hemmati Pourghashti, Rahmat Madandous, M. Ranjbar\",\"doi\":\"10.22075/JRCE.2021.20395.1413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the recycled materials can be considered as a suitable solution for resolving environmental issues. The recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) can be utilized effectively in manufacturing structural concretes. Due to hardness and errors of direct tensile and splitting tensile tests, double -punch test (DPT) can be regarded as a reliable test method for evaluation of tensile strength.In this study, application of DPT was investigated as a less known method for RCA concretes considering effective factors, such as water–to-cement ratio (0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), maximum nominal size of RCA (10 and 19 mm), curing conditions (wet and dry), and replacement level of RCA (0, 50, and 100%) and the results were validated by direct tensile and splitting tensile test results. A statistical analysis was performed to indicate significance of each variable in DPT results of RCA concretes. Also, compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were assessed and their relationships with tensile strength of the specimens were studied.The maximum RCA size, replacement level of RCA, and mechanical properties were diminished in mixtures by increasing water-to-cement ratio. Generally, DPT results showed remarkable proximity to direct tensile test results with a slight increase. In wet curing condition, mean values of splitting tensile, DPT, and direct tensile tests in the specimens containing 19mm of RCA were 11.61, 10.06, and 9.44% higher than those containing 10mm of RCA, respectively. Moreover, results of statistical analysis showed that the studied factors had significant effects on the results and they must be regarded in evaluation of DPT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2021.20395.1413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2021.20395.1413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用回收材料可以被认为是解决环境问题的一个合适的解决方案。再生粗骨料(RCA)可以有效地用于制造结构混凝土。由于直接拉伸和劈裂拉伸试验存在一定的硬度和误差,双冲孔试验可作为一种可靠的拉伸强度评价方法。在本研究中,考虑到诸如水灰比(0.4、0.5和0.6)、RCA的最大标称尺寸(10和19 mm)、养护条件(湿和干)以及RCA的替代水平(0,50和100%)等有效因素,将DPT作为一种鲜为人知的RCA混凝土的应用方法进行了研究,并通过直接拉伸和劈裂拉伸试验结果验证了结果。对RCA混凝土DPT结果进行统计分析,以表明各变量的显著性。同时,对试件的抗压强度和弹性模量进行了评估,并研究了它们与抗拉强度的关系。随着水灰比的增加,RCA的最大粒径、替代水平和力学性能都有所降低。一般来说,DPT结果与直接拉伸试验结果非常接近,略有增加。湿固化条件下,含19mm RCA试件的劈裂拉伸、DPT和直接拉伸试验均值分别比含10mm RCA试件高11.61、10.06和9.44%。此外,统计分析结果表明,所研究的因素对结果有显著影响,在DPT的评价中必须予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studying Tensile Strength of the Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete Using Double-Punch Test
Using the recycled materials can be considered as a suitable solution for resolving environmental issues. The recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) can be utilized effectively in manufacturing structural concretes. Due to hardness and errors of direct tensile and splitting tensile tests, double -punch test (DPT) can be regarded as a reliable test method for evaluation of tensile strength.In this study, application of DPT was investigated as a less known method for RCA concretes considering effective factors, such as water–to-cement ratio (0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), maximum nominal size of RCA (10 and 19 mm), curing conditions (wet and dry), and replacement level of RCA (0, 50, and 100%) and the results were validated by direct tensile and splitting tensile test results. A statistical analysis was performed to indicate significance of each variable in DPT results of RCA concretes. Also, compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were assessed and their relationships with tensile strength of the specimens were studied.The maximum RCA size, replacement level of RCA, and mechanical properties were diminished in mixtures by increasing water-to-cement ratio. Generally, DPT results showed remarkable proximity to direct tensile test results with a slight increase. In wet curing condition, mean values of splitting tensile, DPT, and direct tensile tests in the specimens containing 19mm of RCA were 11.61, 10.06, and 9.44% higher than those containing 10mm of RCA, respectively. Moreover, results of statistical analysis showed that the studied factors had significant effects on the results and they must be regarded in evaluation of DPT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Damage Sensitive-Stories of RC and Steel Frames under Critical Mainshock-Aftershock Ground Motions Evaluation of Intermediate Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame subjected to Truck collision Damage Detection in Prestressed Concrete Slabs Using Wavelet Analysis of Vibration Responses in the Time Domain Rehabilitation of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Elements by Rebar Replacement Risk assessment and challenges faced in repairs and rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1