{"title":"简化第106条审查:“精简”环境影响评估的复杂部分的建议","authors":"C. Nissley, T. King","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2017.1309885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Compliance with Section 106 of the U.S. National Historic Preservation Act is often and understandably seen as an unduly complicated, expensive, and unproductive part of environmental impact assessment. Past efforts to “streamline” review have often made it more complicated and less effective. We propose a simple amendment to the statute, eliminating reliance on the National Register of Historic Places and clarifying the purposes of review.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"80 1","pages":"80 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying Section 106 review: A proposal for “streamlining” a complex part of environmental impact assessment\",\"authors\":\"C. Nissley, T. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660466.2017.1309885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Compliance with Section 106 of the U.S. National Historic Preservation Act is often and understandably seen as an unduly complicated, expensive, and unproductive part of environmental impact assessment. Past efforts to “streamline” review have often made it more complicated and less effective. We propose a simple amendment to the statute, eliminating reliance on the National Register of Historic Places and clarifying the purposes of review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1309885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1309885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplifying Section 106 review: A proposal for “streamlining” a complex part of environmental impact assessment
ABSTRACT Compliance with Section 106 of the U.S. National Historic Preservation Act is often and understandably seen as an unduly complicated, expensive, and unproductive part of environmental impact assessment. Past efforts to “streamline” review have often made it more complicated and less effective. We propose a simple amendment to the statute, eliminating reliance on the National Register of Historic Places and clarifying the purposes of review.
期刊介绍：
Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
