{"title":"台湾与英国社区长期照顾之发展历程:福利多元主义观点的分析","authors":"黃世州 黃世州, 廖宏恩 Shih-Chou Huang, 黃松林 Hung-En Liao, 陳秀靜 Song-Lin Huang","doi":"10.53106/222372402023041301003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 當前臺灣長期照顧是從社區照顧關懷據點模式發展為長照1.0及2.0,與英國西元2000年之前的社區照顧發展過程相仿。本研究旨在探討英國和臺灣社區長期照顧的福利多元主義模式發展歷程。其研究方法係採用解釋性比較研究,在較複雜的體系內,探討部份政策改變的效果。研究發現,英國在機構照顧、社區內照顧之後,由1980s由社區來照顧至1993以後在社區範圍內的照顧階段,與臺灣2005之後兩階段相似。顯示臺灣從英國之模式中有所借鑒,使相關的預算支出獲得相當的控制。本研究建議高齡化國家初期以社區照顧據點自助、社區式長期照顧公助和機構式補助為主,中期則採取社區長期照顧和機構長期照顧的公助相輔相成之方式,而超高齡國家則需以長照保險發展共助來穩定財源。\n This study focuses on community care in Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The comparative analysis was applied to explore the development process of community-based LTC in the United Kingdom and Taiwan from a welfare pluralism perspective. The study found that the United Kingdom and Taiwan have experienced similar policy ideas and practice shifts, that is, from “Care by the Community” to “Care within the Community”. In the time of change, the United Kingdom took place in 1993 and Taiwan in 2005. This study suggests that the national long-term care service strategies should be adjusted according to the degree of population aging. In the early stage, self-help community care bases and community care are mainly used, combined with institutional subsidies. In the medium term, community care, and institutional care provided by the government will be adopted. When reaching the super-advanced age, long-term care insurance will be needed to stabilize financial resources.\n \n","PeriodicalId":31271,"journal":{"name":"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"臺灣與英國社區長期照顧之發展歷程:福利多元主義觀點的分析\",\"authors\":\"黃世州 黃世州, 廖宏恩 Shih-Chou Huang, 黃松林 Hung-En Liao, 陳秀靜 Song-Lin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/222372402023041301003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 當前臺灣長期照顧是從社區照顧關懷據點模式發展為長照1.0及2.0,與英國西元2000年之前的社區照顧發展過程相仿。本研究旨在探討英國和臺灣社區長期照顧的福利多元主義模式發展歷程。其研究方法係採用解釋性比較研究,在較複雜的體系內,探討部份政策改變的效果。研究發現,英國在機構照顧、社區內照顧之後,由1980s由社區來照顧至1993以後在社區範圍內的照顧階段,與臺灣2005之後兩階段相似。顯示臺灣從英國之模式中有所借鑒,使相關的預算支出獲得相當的控制。本研究建議高齡化國家初期以社區照顧據點自助、社區式長期照顧公助和機構式補助為主,中期則採取社區長期照顧和機構長期照顧的公助相輔相成之方式,而超高齡國家則需以長照保險發展共助來穩定財源。\\n This study focuses on community care in Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The comparative analysis was applied to explore the development process of community-based LTC in the United Kingdom and Taiwan from a welfare pluralism perspective. The study found that the United Kingdom and Taiwan have experienced similar policy ideas and practice shifts, that is, from “Care by the Community” to “Care within the Community”. In the time of change, the United Kingdom took place in 1993 and Taiwan in 2005. This study suggests that the national long-term care service strategies should be adjusted according to the degree of population aging. In the early stage, self-help community care bases and community care are mainly used, combined with institutional subsidies. In the medium term, community care, and institutional care provided by the government will be adopted. When reaching the super-advanced age, long-term care insurance will be needed to stabilize financial resources.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":31271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/222372402023041301003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tai Wan Jiao Yu She Hui Xue Yan Jiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/222372402023041301003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当前台湾长期照顾是从社区照顾关怀据点模式发展为长照1.0及2.0,与英国西元2000年之前的社区照顾发展过程相仿。本研究旨在探讨英国和台湾社区长期照顾的福利多元主义模式发展历程。其研究方法系采用解释性比较研究,在较复杂的体系内,探讨部份政策改变的效果。研究发现,英国在机构照顾、社区内照顾之后,由1980s由社区来照顾至1993以后在社区范围内的照顾阶段,与台湾2005之后两阶段相似。显示台湾从英国之模式中有所借鉴,使相关的预算支出获得相当的控制。本研究建议高龄化国家初期以社区照顾据点自助、社区式长期照顾公助和机构式补助为主,中期则采取社区长期照顾和机构长期照顾的公助相辅相成之方式,而超高龄国家则需以长照保险发展共助来稳定财源。 This study focuses on community care in Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The comparative analysis was applied to explore the development process of community-based LTC in the United Kingdom and Taiwan from a welfare pluralism perspective. The study found that the United Kingdom and Taiwan have experienced similar policy ideas and practice shifts, that is, from “Care by the Community” to “Care within the Community”. In the time of change, the United Kingdom took place in 1993 and Taiwan in 2005. This study suggests that the national long-term care service strategies should be adjusted according to the degree of population aging. In the early stage, self-help community care bases and community care are mainly used, combined with institutional subsidies. In the medium term, community care, and institutional care provided by the government will be adopted. When reaching the super-advanced age, long-term care insurance will be needed to stabilize financial resources.
當前臺灣長期照顧是從社區照顧關懷據點模式發展為長照1.0及2.0,與英國西元2000年之前的社區照顧發展過程相仿。本研究旨在探討英國和臺灣社區長期照顧的福利多元主義模式發展歷程。其研究方法係採用解釋性比較研究,在較複雜的體系內,探討部份政策改變的效果。研究發現,英國在機構照顧、社區內照顧之後,由1980s由社區來照顧至1993以後在社區範圍內的照顧階段,與臺灣2005之後兩階段相似。顯示臺灣從英國之模式中有所借鑒,使相關的預算支出獲得相當的控制。本研究建議高齡化國家初期以社區照顧據點自助、社區式長期照顧公助和機構式補助為主,中期則採取社區長期照顧和機構長期照顧的公助相輔相成之方式,而超高齡國家則需以長照保險發展共助來穩定財源。
This study focuses on community care in Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The comparative analysis was applied to explore the development process of community-based LTC in the United Kingdom and Taiwan from a welfare pluralism perspective. The study found that the United Kingdom and Taiwan have experienced similar policy ideas and practice shifts, that is, from “Care by the Community” to “Care within the Community”. In the time of change, the United Kingdom took place in 1993 and Taiwan in 2005. This study suggests that the national long-term care service strategies should be adjusted according to the degree of population aging. In the early stage, self-help community care bases and community care are mainly used, combined with institutional subsidies. In the medium term, community care, and institutional care provided by the government will be adopted. When reaching the super-advanced age, long-term care insurance will be needed to stabilize financial resources.