一个形状和ProTaper Next旋转系统消除根管粪肠球菌的比较:微生物学和扫描电镜评价

Renu B. Sroa, Baljeet Sidhu, Sangeeta Aggarwal, Aakanksha Chopra, Amna Bedi
{"title":"一个形状和ProTaper Next旋转系统消除根管粪肠球菌的比较:微生物学和扫描电镜评价","authors":"Renu B. Sroa, Baljeet Sidhu, Sangeeta Aggarwal, Aakanksha Chopra, Amna Bedi","doi":"10.11648/j.ajim.20180605.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incomplete removal of micro- organisms from infected root canals is a common cause of failed endodontic treatment. The difficulty in eradication of Enterococcus faecalis from root canals plays an essential role in pathogenesis of persistent pulpal and periradicular infections. The aim of the present study was to compare the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals by mechanical instrumentation using two rotary systems (One Shape and ProTaper Next) and Hand K-file instrumentation by using microbiological and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) evaluation. Fifty one freshly extracted mandibular premolars with a single root were collected. After pre-instrumentation sampling, they were divided into three groups, Group A, Group B and Group C in which biomechanical preparation was done using Hand K-File, OneShape and Protaper Next respectively. Reduction in pre- instrumentation and post- instrumentation values of Enterococcus faecalis were analysed using microbiological and SEM evaluation. Statistical analysis by paired ‘t’ test and p value showed that there was highly statistical significant difference in CFU count reduction between the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation values in all the groups (p<0.001). Statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test showed that at 1mm and 3mm level, Group A (Hand K-File) scored significantly higher value followed by Group B (OneShape Apical) and Group C (ProTaper Next). The most effective instrumentation technique in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal was ProTaper Next system in comparison to OneShape Apical and Hand K-File.","PeriodicalId":7179,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of One Shape and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems for Elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis from Root Canal: Microbiological and SEM Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Renu B. Sroa, Baljeet Sidhu, Sangeeta Aggarwal, Aakanksha Chopra, Amna Bedi\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.ajim.20180605.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incomplete removal of micro- organisms from infected root canals is a common cause of failed endodontic treatment. The difficulty in eradication of Enterococcus faecalis from root canals plays an essential role in pathogenesis of persistent pulpal and periradicular infections. The aim of the present study was to compare the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals by mechanical instrumentation using two rotary systems (One Shape and ProTaper Next) and Hand K-file instrumentation by using microbiological and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) evaluation. Fifty one freshly extracted mandibular premolars with a single root were collected. After pre-instrumentation sampling, they were divided into three groups, Group A, Group B and Group C in which biomechanical preparation was done using Hand K-File, OneShape and Protaper Next respectively. Reduction in pre- instrumentation and post- instrumentation values of Enterococcus faecalis were analysed using microbiological and SEM evaluation. Statistical analysis by paired ‘t’ test and p value showed that there was highly statistical significant difference in CFU count reduction between the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation values in all the groups (p<0.001). Statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test showed that at 1mm and 3mm level, Group A (Hand K-File) scored significantly higher value followed by Group B (OneShape Apical) and Group C (ProTaper Next). The most effective instrumentation technique in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal was ProTaper Next system in comparison to OneShape Apical and Hand K-File.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20180605.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20180605.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从感染的根管中不完全清除微生物是根管治疗失败的常见原因。粪肠球菌难以从根管中根除是导致持续性牙髓和根周感染的重要原因。本研究的目的是通过微生物学和扫描电镜(SEM)评估比较两种旋转系统(一种旋转系统和ProTaper下一种旋转系统)的机械器械和手k锉器械在根管内减少粪肠球菌的效果。收集了51颗新鲜拔除的单根下颌前磨牙。器械前取样后分为A组、B组和C组,分别使用Hand K-File、OneShape和Protaper Next进行生物力学准备。使用微生物学和扫描电镜评价分析了仪器前和仪器后粪肠球菌值的降低。配对“t”检验和p值统计分析显示,各组CFU计数减少在器械前和器械后值之间具有高度统计学意义(p<0.001)。Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验的统计分析显示,在1mm和3mm水平上,A组(Hand K-File)得分显著高于B组(OneShape Apical)和C组(ProTaper Next)。与OneShape Apical和Hand K-File相比,ProTaper Next系统是清除根管中粪肠球菌最有效的器械技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of One Shape and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems for Elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis from Root Canal: Microbiological and SEM Evaluation
Incomplete removal of micro- organisms from infected root canals is a common cause of failed endodontic treatment. The difficulty in eradication of Enterococcus faecalis from root canals plays an essential role in pathogenesis of persistent pulpal and periradicular infections. The aim of the present study was to compare the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in root canals by mechanical instrumentation using two rotary systems (One Shape and ProTaper Next) and Hand K-file instrumentation by using microbiological and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) evaluation. Fifty one freshly extracted mandibular premolars with a single root were collected. After pre-instrumentation sampling, they were divided into three groups, Group A, Group B and Group C in which biomechanical preparation was done using Hand K-File, OneShape and Protaper Next respectively. Reduction in pre- instrumentation and post- instrumentation values of Enterococcus faecalis were analysed using microbiological and SEM evaluation. Statistical analysis by paired ‘t’ test and p value showed that there was highly statistical significant difference in CFU count reduction between the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation values in all the groups (p<0.001). Statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test showed that at 1mm and 3mm level, Group A (Hand K-File) scored significantly higher value followed by Group B (OneShape Apical) and Group C (ProTaper Next). The most effective instrumentation technique in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal was ProTaper Next system in comparison to OneShape Apical and Hand K-File.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEBRIDEMENT IN DIABETIC FOOT ULCER Malnutrition in Patients Following Bariatric Surgery Cardiac Diseases During Systemic Inflammatory Diseases in the Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology Department of NTHC-HKM of Cotonou Blood Count Under the Effect of Erythropoietin (EPO) in Patients with Chronic Hemodialysis Increased Colorectal Cancer Rate in Turner Syndrome: A Case Control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1