知识生产的全球趋势和不断发展的同行评议过程

IF 0.2 Q2 Arts and Humanities JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.36253/jlis.it-515
Steven W. Witt
{"title":"知识生产的全球趋势和不断发展的同行评议过程","authors":"Steven W. Witt","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay thus seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is evolving. These changes occur within a context of massive growth in the knowledge production process: global trends, information technologies, and policies that encourage more people globally to take part in the research process. Associated with these global changes are stressors on the peer review process and particularly questions about who gets to be a peer reviewer and who has the right to produce knowledge under these processes.  Less a formal review and analysis of peer review across LIS, this essay takes the form of an autoethnographic narrative that that seeks to draw upon the researcher’s personal observations, experience, and reflections to critically examine changes to the peer review system that are taking place.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Trends in Knowledge Production and the Evolving Peer Review Process\",\"authors\":\"Steven W. Witt\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/jlis.it-515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay thus seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is evolving. These changes occur within a context of massive growth in the knowledge production process: global trends, information technologies, and policies that encourage more people globally to take part in the research process. Associated with these global changes are stressors on the peer review process and particularly questions about who gets to be a peer reviewer and who has the right to produce knowledge under these processes.  Less a formal review and analysis of peer review across LIS, this essay takes the form of an autoethnographic narrative that that seeks to draw upon the researcher’s personal observations, experience, and reflections to critically examine changes to the peer review system that are taking place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JLIS.it\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JLIS.it\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JLIS.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

因此,本文试图为同行评审过程和同行评审管理正在发展的方式提供进一步的批评和清晰度。这些变化发生在知识生产过程大规模增长的背景下:全球趋势、信息技术和鼓励全球更多人参与研究过程的政策。与这些全球变化相关的是同行评议过程的压力源,特别是关于谁可以成为同行评议人以及谁有权在这些过程中产生知识的问题。这篇文章不是对美国同行评议的正式审查和分析,而是采用了一种自我民族志叙事的形式,旨在利用研究人员的个人观察、经验和反思,批判性地审视正在发生的同行评议制度的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Trends in Knowledge Production and the Evolving Peer Review Process
This essay thus seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is evolving. These changes occur within a context of massive growth in the knowledge production process: global trends, information technologies, and policies that encourage more people globally to take part in the research process. Associated with these global changes are stressors on the peer review process and particularly questions about who gets to be a peer reviewer and who has the right to produce knowledge under these processes.  Less a formal review and analysis of peer review across LIS, this essay takes the form of an autoethnographic narrative that that seeks to draw upon the researcher’s personal observations, experience, and reflections to critically examine changes to the peer review system that are taking place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JLIS.it
JLIS.it INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JLIS.it is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to valorise international research in Library and Information Science. Contributions in LIS, Library and Information Science, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Librarianship as Civic Engagement Hachette v. Internet Archive On the edge of knowledge Alberto Petrucciani. Un amico, un collega, un Maestro Document as a multifaceted knowledge object
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1