生物多样性补偿与“等效性质”的构建

ACME Pub Date : 2018-07-23 DOI:10.17863/CAM.35366
E. Apostolopoulou, E. Greco, W. Adams
{"title":"生物多样性补偿与“等效性质”的构建","authors":"E. Apostolopoulou, E. Greco, W. Adams","doi":"10.17863/CAM.35366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explore the logic of biodiversity offsetting, focusing on its core promise: the production of ‘equivalent natures’. We show how the construction of equivalence unravels the environmental contradictions of capitalism by exploring how and why it is achieved, and its profound implications for nature-society dialectics. We focus on the construction of an ecological equivalence between ecosystems, the construction of ecological credits that are considered equivalent in monetary terms, and, finally, the construction of an equivalence between places. The existing critical literature, in some cases implicitly and unwittingly, assumes that biodiversity offsetting creates value. In contrast to this argument, we apply Marx’s labour theory of value to conclude that in the majority of instances offsetting does not create value, rather it is an instance of rent. We also draw on Marxist analyses on the production of nature and place to show that biodiversity offsetting radically rescripts nature as placeless, obscuring the fact that it facilitates the production of space, place, and nature according to the interests of capital while emphasizing that at the core of offsetting lie social struggles over rights and access to land and nature. Biodiversity offsetting’s dystopian vision for the future makes it an important focus for all critical scholars seeking to understand and challenge the contradictions of the capitalist production of nature.","PeriodicalId":39706,"journal":{"name":"ACME","volume":"7 1","pages":"861-892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity Offsetting and the Construction of ‘Equivalent Natures'\",\"authors\":\"E. Apostolopoulou, E. Greco, W. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.17863/CAM.35366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we explore the logic of biodiversity offsetting, focusing on its core promise: the production of ‘equivalent natures’. We show how the construction of equivalence unravels the environmental contradictions of capitalism by exploring how and why it is achieved, and its profound implications for nature-society dialectics. We focus on the construction of an ecological equivalence between ecosystems, the construction of ecological credits that are considered equivalent in monetary terms, and, finally, the construction of an equivalence between places. The existing critical literature, in some cases implicitly and unwittingly, assumes that biodiversity offsetting creates value. In contrast to this argument, we apply Marx’s labour theory of value to conclude that in the majority of instances offsetting does not create value, rather it is an instance of rent. We also draw on Marxist analyses on the production of nature and place to show that biodiversity offsetting radically rescripts nature as placeless, obscuring the fact that it facilitates the production of space, place, and nature according to the interests of capital while emphasizing that at the core of offsetting lie social struggles over rights and access to land and nature. Biodiversity offsetting’s dystopian vision for the future makes it an important focus for all critical scholars seeking to understand and challenge the contradictions of the capitalist production of nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACME\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"861-892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了生物多样性抵消的逻辑,重点关注其核心承诺:“等效自然”的生产。我们通过探索资本主义是如何以及为什么实现的,以及它对自然-社会辩证法的深刻含义,展示了等效的构建如何解开资本主义的环境矛盾。我们的重点是构建生态系统之间的生态等价,构建在货币方面被认为是等价的生态信用,最后,构建地方之间的等价。现有的批评文献,在某些情况下,含蓄地和无意地假设生物多样性抵消创造价值。与此论点相反,我们运用马克思的劳动价值论得出结论,在大多数情况下,抵消并不创造价值,而是租金的一个例子。我们还利用马克思主义对自然和地点生产的分析来表明,生物多样性抵消从根本上将自然描述为无地点的,掩盖了它根据资本利益促进空间、地点和自然生产的事实,同时强调抵消的核心是对权利和对土地和自然的获取的社会斗争。生物多样性抵消对未来的反乌托邦愿景使其成为所有寻求理解和挑战资本主义自然生产矛盾的批判性学者的重要焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biodiversity Offsetting and the Construction of ‘Equivalent Natures'
In this paper we explore the logic of biodiversity offsetting, focusing on its core promise: the production of ‘equivalent natures’. We show how the construction of equivalence unravels the environmental contradictions of capitalism by exploring how and why it is achieved, and its profound implications for nature-society dialectics. We focus on the construction of an ecological equivalence between ecosystems, the construction of ecological credits that are considered equivalent in monetary terms, and, finally, the construction of an equivalence between places. The existing critical literature, in some cases implicitly and unwittingly, assumes that biodiversity offsetting creates value. In contrast to this argument, we apply Marx’s labour theory of value to conclude that in the majority of instances offsetting does not create value, rather it is an instance of rent. We also draw on Marxist analyses on the production of nature and place to show that biodiversity offsetting radically rescripts nature as placeless, obscuring the fact that it facilitates the production of space, place, and nature according to the interests of capital while emphasizing that at the core of offsetting lie social struggles over rights and access to land and nature. Biodiversity offsetting’s dystopian vision for the future makes it an important focus for all critical scholars seeking to understand and challenge the contradictions of the capitalist production of nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACME
ACME Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ACME is an on-line international journal for critical and radical analyses of the social, the spatial and the political. The journal"s purpose is to provide a forum for the publication of critical and radical work about space in the social sciences - including anarchist, anti-racist, environmentalist, feminist, Marxist, non-representational, postcolonial, poststructuralist, queer, situationist and socialist perspectives. Analyses that are critical and radical are understood to be part of the praxis of social and political change aimed at challenging, dismantling, and transforming prevalent relations, systems, and structures of capitalist exploitation, oppression, imperialism, neo-liberalism, national aggression, and environmental destruction.
期刊最新文献
myth of mankind and the representation of people in Late 18th-century British dictionaries of trade and commerce Prometeo e il destino nel nome: [Aesch.] Pr. 86 Romolo divino, Romolo fatto a pezzi. L’uso politico del mito della scomparsa del primo re alla fine della Repubblica Rosa Calzecchi Onesti studiosa di varianti d’autore Ripartenza postbellica in due mostre a Roma, in Palazzo Venezia, negli anni 1944 e 1945
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1