{"title":"全民基本收入的政治理论","authors":"J. Bidadanure","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal basic income (UBI) is a radical policy proposal of a monthly cash grant given to all members of a community without means test, regardless of personal desert, with no strings attached, and, under most proposals, at a sufficiently high level to enable a life free from economic insecurity. Once a utopian proposal, the policy is now widely discussed and piloted throughout the world. Among the various objections to the proposal, one concerns its moral adequacy: Isn't it fundamentally unjust to give cash to all indiscriminately rather than to those who need it and deserve it? This article reviews the variety of strategies deployed by political theorists to posit that the proposal is in fact justified, or even required, by social justice. The review focuses mainly on the contemporary normative debate on UBI—roughly dating back to Philippe Van Parijs's influential work in the 1990s—and is centered on the ideals of freedom and equality.","PeriodicalId":48264,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Political Science","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income\",\"authors\":\"J. Bidadanure\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Universal basic income (UBI) is a radical policy proposal of a monthly cash grant given to all members of a community without means test, regardless of personal desert, with no strings attached, and, under most proposals, at a sufficiently high level to enable a life free from economic insecurity. Once a utopian proposal, the policy is now widely discussed and piloted throughout the world. Among the various objections to the proposal, one concerns its moral adequacy: Isn't it fundamentally unjust to give cash to all indiscriminately rather than to those who need it and deserve it? This article reviews the variety of strategies deployed by political theorists to posit that the proposal is in fact justified, or even required, by social justice. The review focuses mainly on the contemporary normative debate on UBI—roughly dating back to Philippe Van Parijs's influential work in the 1990s—and is centered on the ideals of freedom and equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070954\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070954","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74
摘要
全民基本收入(Universal basic income, UBI)是一项激进的政策建议,它每月向一个社区的所有成员发放现金补助,无需进行经济状况调查,无论个人状况如何,没有任何附加条件,而且在大多数建议下,数额足够高,足以使人们摆脱经济不安全的生活。这项政策曾经是一个乌托邦式的建议,现在在世界各地得到广泛讨论和试点。在对该提议的各种反对意见中,有一种是关于其道德充分性的:不加区分地把钱给所有人,而不是给那些需要它、值得它的人,这从根本上说不是不公正的吗?本文回顾了政治理论家运用的各种策略,以假设该提议实际上是合理的,甚至是社会正义所要求的。这篇评论主要集中在当代关于ubi的规范性辩论上——大致可以追溯到菲利普·范·帕里斯(Philippe Van Parijs)在20世纪90年代有影响力的作品——并以自由和平等的理想为中心。
Universal basic income (UBI) is a radical policy proposal of a monthly cash grant given to all members of a community without means test, regardless of personal desert, with no strings attached, and, under most proposals, at a sufficiently high level to enable a life free from economic insecurity. Once a utopian proposal, the policy is now widely discussed and piloted throughout the world. Among the various objections to the proposal, one concerns its moral adequacy: Isn't it fundamentally unjust to give cash to all indiscriminately rather than to those who need it and deserve it? This article reviews the variety of strategies deployed by political theorists to posit that the proposal is in fact justified, or even required, by social justice. The review focuses mainly on the contemporary normative debate on UBI—roughly dating back to Philippe Van Parijs's influential work in the 1990s—and is centered on the ideals of freedom and equality.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Political Science has been published since 1998 to provide comprehensive coverage of critical advancements in the field. It encompasses a wide range of subjects within Political Science, such as political theory and philosophy, international relations, political economy, political behavior, American and comparative politics, public administration and policy, and methodology.