愤怒地回头看:风险评估的回顾性评估缺陷

M. Large, O. Nielssen
{"title":"愤怒地回头看:风险评估的回顾性评估缺陷","authors":"M. Large, O. Nielssen","doi":"10.1192/PB.37.11.373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The team from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness recently posted a report on quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide.[1][1] The report describes an un-masked retrospective survey of the risk assessments found in the case notes","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"34 1","pages":"373-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Look back in anger: flaws in the retrospective evaluation of risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"M. Large, O. Nielssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/PB.37.11.373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The team from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness recently posted a report on quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide.[1][1] The report describes an un-masked retrospective survey of the risk assessments found in the case notes\",\"PeriodicalId\":89639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"373-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.11.373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.11.373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

精神疾病患者自杀和杀人国家机密调查小组最近发布了一份关于自杀和杀人前风险评估质量的报告。该报告描述了对病例记录中发现的风险评估进行的公开回顾性调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Look back in anger: flaws in the retrospective evaluation of risk assessment
The team from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness recently posted a report on quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide.[1][1] The report describes an un-masked retrospective survey of the risk assessments found in the case notes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professor Thomas Trauer BA (Hons), PhD Psychiatric medications are no more effective Academic training in psychiatry Psychiatry needs more psychotherapy Adverse medication events in a psychiatric practice: a naturalistic study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1