以需求为本的家庭支持-实际执行中的认知、结构和挑战

Anja Lentz-Becker, Barbara Bräutigam, Matthias Müller
{"title":"以需求为本的家庭支持-实际执行中的认知、结构和挑战","authors":"Anja Lentz-Becker, Barbara Bräutigam, Matthias Müller","doi":"10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2020.v9.x.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research into the utilisation of preventive family support relates mainly to structural requirements such as low-threshold access to services. Beside structural framework conditions in context of family support, the question arises as to what extent the subjective perception of preventive family support is one more aspect of utilisation and to what extent preventive family support actually matches the needs of families. This Study asks as well what connotations and attitudes do families have regarding family support services? How important do families consider these offers and what are their needs? Based on a mixed-methods design, the Citizens’ Survey on Family Support was conducted by means of a standardised questionnaire in combination with interviews of family support users and non-users in order to elaborate deeper meaning structures through the qualitative analysis method of grounded theory. Summary survey results point out that family support in Germany includes a wide range of offers, which can promote a broad array of familial interests and competences, but not all families, diverse as they are, feel consciously addressed – or else they see obstacles to using family services. Our qualitative results point out that ‘family support’ as a term is neither clearly identified nor properly understood by many citizens – or else it has different connotations. However, those families who do use the services – within the framework of transitioning to parenthood – feel supported in their psychosocial adaptations and regulatory processes. In relation to results and as compared to other EU countries, practical implications for further developments in family support approaches are discussed.","PeriodicalId":32323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Needs-based family support – Perception, structures and challenges in practical implementation\",\"authors\":\"Anja Lentz-Becker, Barbara Bräutigam, Matthias Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2020.v9.x.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research into the utilisation of preventive family support relates mainly to structural requirements such as low-threshold access to services. Beside structural framework conditions in context of family support, the question arises as to what extent the subjective perception of preventive family support is one more aspect of utilisation and to what extent preventive family support actually matches the needs of families. This Study asks as well what connotations and attitudes do families have regarding family support services? How important do families consider these offers and what are their needs? Based on a mixed-methods design, the Citizens’ Survey on Family Support was conducted by means of a standardised questionnaire in combination with interviews of family support users and non-users in order to elaborate deeper meaning structures through the qualitative analysis method of grounded theory. Summary survey results point out that family support in Germany includes a wide range of offers, which can promote a broad array of familial interests and competences, but not all families, diverse as they are, feel consciously addressed – or else they see obstacles to using family services. Our qualitative results point out that ‘family support’ as a term is neither clearly identified nor properly understood by many citizens – or else it has different connotations. However, those families who do use the services – within the framework of transitioning to parenthood – feel supported in their psychosocial adaptations and regulatory processes. In relation to results and as compared to other EU countries, practical implications for further developments in family support approaches are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2020.v9.x.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2020.v9.x.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对预防性家庭支助利用情况的研究主要涉及诸如获得服务的低门槛等结构性要求。除了家庭支助方面的结构框架条件外,还出现了一个问题,即预防性家庭支助的主观看法在多大程度上是利用的另一个方面,预防性家庭支助在多大程度上实际符合家庭的需要。本研究亦询问家庭对家庭支援服务有何内涵及态度?家庭认为这些提议有多重要?他们的需求是什么?《公民家庭支持调查》采用混合方法设计,采用标准化问卷,结合对家庭支持使用者和非使用者的访谈,通过扎根理论的定性分析方法,阐述更深层次的意义结构。摘要调查结果指出,德国的家庭支持包括各种各样的服务,这些服务可以促进广泛的家庭兴趣和能力,但并非所有家庭,尽管各不相同,都感到有意识地得到了处理,否则他们就会看到使用家庭服务的障碍。我们的定性结果指出,“家庭支持”作为一个术语,既没有被许多公民清楚地识别出来,也没有被正确地理解——或者它有不同的内涵。然而,那些在过渡到为人父母的框架内使用这些服务的家庭在其社会心理适应和调节过程中感到得到了支持。关于结果,并与其他欧盟国家相比,讨论了进一步发展家庭支助办法的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Needs-based family support – Perception, structures and challenges in practical implementation
Research into the utilisation of preventive family support relates mainly to structural requirements such as low-threshold access to services. Beside structural framework conditions in context of family support, the question arises as to what extent the subjective perception of preventive family support is one more aspect of utilisation and to what extent preventive family support actually matches the needs of families. This Study asks as well what connotations and attitudes do families have regarding family support services? How important do families consider these offers and what are their needs? Based on a mixed-methods design, the Citizens’ Survey on Family Support was conducted by means of a standardised questionnaire in combination with interviews of family support users and non-users in order to elaborate deeper meaning structures through the qualitative analysis method of grounded theory. Summary survey results point out that family support in Germany includes a wide range of offers, which can promote a broad array of familial interests and competences, but not all families, diverse as they are, feel consciously addressed – or else they see obstacles to using family services. Our qualitative results point out that ‘family support’ as a term is neither clearly identified nor properly understood by many citizens – or else it has different connotations. However, those families who do use the services – within the framework of transitioning to parenthood – feel supported in their psychosocial adaptations and regulatory processes. In relation to results and as compared to other EU countries, practical implications for further developments in family support approaches are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Influence of the Islamic Social Environment in Developing Children's Creativity: A Case Study of Maestro Architect Achmad Noe'man The Concept of Democracy Education as an Effort for Developing The Political Culture of Participating Communities Trends of Millenial Generation Hijrah in Religious Maturity Perspective Inclusive Education as An Effort To Deradicalize Religion in Indonesia Challenges Against Implementation of Social Studies Curriculum for Moral Development in Nigerian Junior Secondary Schools: Ilorin as Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1