组织年龄多样性管理量表:发展与效度证据

Q4 Psychology Psico-USF Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-82712022270204
Juliana Seidl, E. R. Neiva, Cristiane Faiad, S. G. Murta
{"title":"组织年龄多样性管理量表:发展与效度证据","authors":"Juliana Seidl, E. R. Neiva, Cristiane Faiad, S. G. Murta","doi":"10.1590/1413-82712022270204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to develop the Age Diversity Management in Organizations scale for the Brazilian context and verify its evidence of validity. The process included five steps: proposal of its definition and development of the items according to the literature; content and semantic validity by judges; semantic validity by the target population; exploratory factorial analysis (EFA); and confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA). The EFA sample consisted of 674 workers from different organizations and the CFA of 722 workers. The final version of the scale was composed of 20 items (α =.91), divided into four factors: retirement preparation practices (5 items, α =.93); equal treatment for workers of different ages (6 items, a=.85), training to promote age diversity (5 items, α =.81), and management practices for older workers (4 items, α =.72). The theoretical and practical implications as well as the limitations of this measure are discussed.","PeriodicalId":20767,"journal":{"name":"Psico-USF","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age Diversity Management in Organizations Scale: Development and Evidence of Validity\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Seidl, E. R. Neiva, Cristiane Faiad, S. G. Murta\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-82712022270204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aimed to develop the Age Diversity Management in Organizations scale for the Brazilian context and verify its evidence of validity. The process included five steps: proposal of its definition and development of the items according to the literature; content and semantic validity by judges; semantic validity by the target population; exploratory factorial analysis (EFA); and confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA). The EFA sample consisted of 674 workers from different organizations and the CFA of 722 workers. The final version of the scale was composed of 20 items (α =.91), divided into four factors: retirement preparation practices (5 items, α =.93); equal treatment for workers of different ages (6 items, a=.85), training to promote age diversity (5 items, α =.81), and management practices for older workers (4 items, α =.72). The theoretical and practical implications as well as the limitations of this measure are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psico-USF\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psico-USF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712022270204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psico-USF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712022270204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究旨在编制适合巴西背景的组织年龄多样性管理量表,并验证其有效性证据。该过程包括五个步骤:根据文献提出其定义和发展项目;法官的内容效度和语义效度;目标人群的语义效度;探索性因子分析(EFA);和验证性因子分析(CFA)。全民教育样本由来自不同组织的674名工人和CFA的722名工人组成。最终版量表由20个项目组成(α = 0.91),分为4个因素:退休准备实践(5个项目,α = 0.93);对不同年龄工人的平等待遇(6项,a= 0.85),促进年龄多样性的培训(5项,α = 0.81),以及对老年工人的管理实践(4项,α = 0.72)。讨论了该措施的理论和实践意义以及局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Age Diversity Management in Organizations Scale: Development and Evidence of Validity
Abstract This study aimed to develop the Age Diversity Management in Organizations scale for the Brazilian context and verify its evidence of validity. The process included five steps: proposal of its definition and development of the items according to the literature; content and semantic validity by judges; semantic validity by the target population; exploratory factorial analysis (EFA); and confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA). The EFA sample consisted of 674 workers from different organizations and the CFA of 722 workers. The final version of the scale was composed of 20 items (α =.91), divided into four factors: retirement preparation practices (5 items, α =.93); equal treatment for workers of different ages (6 items, a=.85), training to promote age diversity (5 items, α =.81), and management practices for older workers (4 items, α =.72). The theoretical and practical implications as well as the limitations of this measure are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psico-USF
Psico-USF Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hope, health and cure: the meanings of the vaccine against COVID-19 Questionário de Adaptação ao Ensino Superior Remoto: Ampliação das Propriedades Psicométricas Evidence of Intervention Effectiveness with Engaging Leaders in Hospital Physiotherapy Autocompaixão em Estudantes Universitários: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura Impacto Psicossocial da Pandemia de COVID-19 na Saúde Mental de Pessoas Transexuais e Travestis: Revisão Integrativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1