你介意我过去吗?研究机器人在走廊中穿越两个正在交谈的人时的适当行为*

Björn Petrak, Gundula Sopper, Katharina Weitz, E. André
{"title":"你介意我过去吗?研究机器人在走廊中穿越两个正在交谈的人时的适当行为*","authors":"Björn Petrak, Gundula Sopper, Katharina Weitz, E. André","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several works highlight how robots can navigate in a socially-aware manner by respecting and avoiding people’s personal spaces. But how should the robot act when there is no way around a group of persons? In this work, we explore this question by comparing three different ways to cross two conversing people in a hallway environment. In an online study with 135 participants, users rated the robot’s behavior on several items such as \"social adequacy\" or how \"disturbing\" it was. The three versions differ in the type of contact intention, i.e., no contact, nonverbal contact, and a combination of nonverbal and verbal contact. The results show that, on the one hand, users expect social behavior from the robot, so that they can anticipate its behavior, but on the other hand, they want it to be as little disruptive as possible.","PeriodicalId":6854,"journal":{"name":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"42 1","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do You Mind if I Pass Through? Studying the Appropriate Robot Behavior when Traversing two Conversing People in a Hallway Setting*\",\"authors\":\"Björn Petrak, Gundula Sopper, Katharina Weitz, E. André\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several works highlight how robots can navigate in a socially-aware manner by respecting and avoiding people’s personal spaces. But how should the robot act when there is no way around a group of persons? In this work, we explore this question by comparing three different ways to cross two conversing people in a hallway environment. In an online study with 135 participants, users rated the robot’s behavior on several items such as \\\"social adequacy\\\" or how \\\"disturbing\\\" it was. The three versions differ in the type of contact intention, i.e., no contact, nonverbal contact, and a combination of nonverbal and verbal contact. The results show that, on the one hand, users expect social behavior from the robot, so that they can anticipate its behavior, but on the other hand, they want it to be as little disruptive as possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"369-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一些作品强调了机器人如何通过尊重和避开人们的私人空间,以一种社会意识的方式导航。但是,当一群人无处可逃时,机器人该如何行动呢?在这项工作中,我们通过比较三种不同的方式来探讨这个问题,以跨越两个在走廊环境中交谈的人。在一项有135名参与者的在线研究中,用户对机器人的行为进行了打分,比如“社交充分性”或“令人不安”的程度。这三种版本在接触意图的类型上有所不同,即不接触、非语言接触和非语言与语言接触的结合。结果表明,一方面,用户期望机器人的社交行为,这样他们就可以预测它的行为,但另一方面,他们希望它尽可能少地破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do You Mind if I Pass Through? Studying the Appropriate Robot Behavior when Traversing two Conversing People in a Hallway Setting*
Several works highlight how robots can navigate in a socially-aware manner by respecting and avoiding people’s personal spaces. But how should the robot act when there is no way around a group of persons? In this work, we explore this question by comparing three different ways to cross two conversing people in a hallway environment. In an online study with 135 participants, users rated the robot’s behavior on several items such as "social adequacy" or how "disturbing" it was. The three versions differ in the type of contact intention, i.e., no contact, nonverbal contact, and a combination of nonverbal and verbal contact. The results show that, on the one hand, users expect social behavior from the robot, so that they can anticipate its behavior, but on the other hand, they want it to be as little disruptive as possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Birds of a Feather Flock Together: But do Humans and Robots? A Meta-Analysis of Human and Robot Personality Matching Responsiveness towards robot-assisted interactions among pre-primary children of Indian ethnicity Discrepancies between designs of robot communicative styles and their perceived assertiveness The Influence of Robot's Unexpected Behavior on Individual Cognitive Performance An Exploration of Accessible Remote Tele-operation for Assistive Mobile Manipulators in the Home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1