奥古斯丁对异端的研究有助于理解他关于基督教传统相互作用的思想

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Journal of World Christianity Pub Date : 2020-12-10 DOI:10.1163/9789004444867_013
P. V. Geest
{"title":"奥古斯丁对异端的研究有助于理解他关于基督教传统相互作用的思想","authors":"P. V. Geest","doi":"10.1163/9789004444867_013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being understood as a phenomenon, World Christianity implicitly has a long tradition. It is true: the striving for a consensus partum (or consensus quinquesaecularis), already noticeable in the Decretum Gratiani (a synthesis of canon law which consist for about thirty percent of patristic texts), shows the need for certainty and convenient arrangement where matters of faith and church discipline are concerned in the Middle Ages. Little account was taken of 1) their attention for the multicultural pluriformity of Christian communities and their agents 2) the correlations and interference between their ‘theological’ expressions and the historical and philosophical mainstreams. In this contribution I am going to expound these attention for the multicultural pluriformity in the works of Augustine particularly by interpreting his definition of ‘heresia’. As will be shown his definition offers more room for the diversity of expressions of Christian life and faith than can be deduced from the synthesis of his works by later interpreters.","PeriodicalId":40931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Christianity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augustine’s Approach to Heresies as an Aid to Understanding His Ideas on Interaction between Christian Traditions\",\"authors\":\"P. V. Geest\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004444867_013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Being understood as a phenomenon, World Christianity implicitly has a long tradition. It is true: the striving for a consensus partum (or consensus quinquesaecularis), already noticeable in the Decretum Gratiani (a synthesis of canon law which consist for about thirty percent of patristic texts), shows the need for certainty and convenient arrangement where matters of faith and church discipline are concerned in the Middle Ages. Little account was taken of 1) their attention for the multicultural pluriformity of Christian communities and their agents 2) the correlations and interference between their ‘theological’ expressions and the historical and philosophical mainstreams. In this contribution I am going to expound these attention for the multicultural pluriformity in the works of Augustine particularly by interpreting his definition of ‘heresia’. As will be shown his definition offers more room for the diversity of expressions of Christian life and faith than can be deduced from the synthesis of his works by later interpreters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Christianity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Christianity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004444867_013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004444867_013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为一种现象,世界基督教隐含着悠久的传统。这是真的:在《格拉提安尼法令》(Decretum Gratiani)(教会法的综合,约占教父文本的30%)中,对共识的努力(或共识)已经很明显了,表明在中世纪,信仰和教会纪律问题需要确定性和方便的安排。很少有人注意到:1)他们对基督教社区及其代理人的多元文化多元性的关注;2)他们的“神学”表达与历史和哲学主流之间的相互关系和干扰。在这篇文章中,我将阐述对奥古斯丁作品中多元文化多元性的关注,特别是通过解释他对“异端”的定义。正如将要展示的,他的定义为基督徒生活和信仰的多样性表达提供了更多的空间,而不是后来的解释者从他的作品中推断出来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Augustine’s Approach to Heresies as an Aid to Understanding His Ideas on Interaction between Christian Traditions
Being understood as a phenomenon, World Christianity implicitly has a long tradition. It is true: the striving for a consensus partum (or consensus quinquesaecularis), already noticeable in the Decretum Gratiani (a synthesis of canon law which consist for about thirty percent of patristic texts), shows the need for certainty and convenient arrangement where matters of faith and church discipline are concerned in the Middle Ages. Little account was taken of 1) their attention for the multicultural pluriformity of Christian communities and their agents 2) the correlations and interference between their ‘theological’ expressions and the historical and philosophical mainstreams. In this contribution I am going to expound these attention for the multicultural pluriformity in the works of Augustine particularly by interpreting his definition of ‘heresia’. As will be shown his definition offers more room for the diversity of expressions of Christian life and faith than can be deduced from the synthesis of his works by later interpreters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Announcing Editorial Changes Decolonizing Churches Decolonizing Churches as Emancipation and Exorcism From an Excluded Mission Field to the World Christianity Map: The CCLA and Emerging Voices of Elite Latin American Protestants (1910–1929) God’s Internationalists: World Vision and the Age of Evangelical Humanitarianism, by David P. King
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1