聚焦和深度:可能的椭圆增量函数

Edoardo Chiattelli
{"title":"聚焦和深度:可能的椭圆增量函数","authors":"Edoardo Chiattelli","doi":"10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Bakker, the Homeric augment was a morpheme of proximal deixis. This theory can be confirmed in two contexts: similes, where the coexistence of present indicatives and augmented aorists can be explained only by considering the category of aspect, not the one of tense; and contexts involving the adjective νήπιος, which are here explained not only from a narrative viewpoint, but also by considering the major presence of augmented forms in them. The PIE augment seems to have been a deictic particle not compatible with present tense and it might have been initially used only with aorists and later extended to imperfects, as foregrounding is strongly related to perfectivity.","PeriodicalId":43767,"journal":{"name":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focalizzazione e deissi: una possibile funzione dell’aumento omerico\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Chiattelli\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Bakker, the Homeric augment was a morpheme of proximal deixis. This theory can be confirmed in two contexts: similes, where the coexistence of present indicatives and augmented aorists can be explained only by considering the category of aspect, not the one of tense; and contexts involving the adjective νήπιος, which are here explained not only from a narrative viewpoint, but also by considering the major presence of augmented forms in them. The PIE augment seems to have been a deictic particle not compatible with present tense and it might have been initially used only with aorists and later extended to imperfects, as foregrounding is strongly related to perfectivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/GLOT.2019.95.1.26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据巴克的说法,荷马语的增词是近端指示语的语素。这一理论可以在两种情况下得到证实:明喻,在明喻中,现在指示和增广指示的共存只能通过考虑方面的范畴来解释,而不是时态的范畴;以及涉及形容词ν πιος的上下文,在这里不仅从叙述的角度解释,而且考虑到其中主要存在的增广形式。PIE增词似乎是一个指示语词,与现在时不兼容,它最初可能只用于描述完美,后来扩展到描述不完美,因为前景与完美密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Focalizzazione e deissi: una possibile funzione dell’aumento omerico
According to Bakker, the Homeric augment was a morpheme of proximal deixis. This theory can be confirmed in two contexts: similes, where the coexistence of present indicatives and augmented aorists can be explained only by considering the category of aspect, not the one of tense; and contexts involving the adjective νήπιος, which are here explained not only from a narrative viewpoint, but also by considering the major presence of augmented forms in them. The PIE augment seems to have been a deictic particle not compatible with present tense and it might have been initially used only with aorists and later extended to imperfects, as foregrounding is strongly related to perfectivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift erscheint seit 1909 in zwangloser Folge. Vor allem sprachgeschichtliche, strukturelle und etymologische Untersuchungen werden publiziert; Beiträge in deutscher oder englischer Sprache.
期刊最新文献
On the -θ- in Greek οἶσθα ‘you know’ < *uoid-th2e The outcome of *-er/ni- in Greek Sobre el valor pseudo inclusivo de la primera persona del plural en la Ilíada The stories behind names La partícula ἄρα: orígenes y evolución semántica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1