许多可以提出Woodward - Hoffmann规则但没有提出的化学家:发现确凿证据的有机化学家[]**

J. I. Seeman
{"title":"许多可以提出Woodward - Hoffmann规则但没有提出的化学家:发现确凿证据的有机化学家[]**","authors":"J. I. Seeman","doi":"10.1002/tcr.202200065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a reasonable question to ask, why, as of 1965 when the five Woodward‐Hoffmann communications appeared, did no other organic chemist discover the orbital symmetry rules for pericyclic reactions? Two theoretical chemists – Luitzen Oosterhoff (in 1961) and Kenichi Fukui (in 1964) had discovered portions of the orbital symmetry rules before Woodward and Hoffmann. Why not organic chemists? Indeed, perhaps the greatest motivation to discover the mechanism of a mysterious reaction is to uncover key examples of that mysterious reaction in your very own laboratory. The stories of 20 chemists and R. B. Woodward are discussed in this paper which is Paper 6 in a 27‐paper series on the history of Woodward‐Hoffmann rules. Social, political, and scientific explanations will also be presented as partial explanations as to why none of these individuals – except Woodward with Hoffmann – solved the pericyclic no‐mechanism problem.","PeriodicalId":22443,"journal":{"name":"The Chemical Record","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Many Chemists Who Could Have Proposed the Woodward‐Hoffmann Rules But Didn't: The Organic Chemists Who Discovered the Smoking Guns[] **\",\"authors\":\"J. I. Seeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tcr.202200065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a reasonable question to ask, why, as of 1965 when the five Woodward‐Hoffmann communications appeared, did no other organic chemist discover the orbital symmetry rules for pericyclic reactions? Two theoretical chemists – Luitzen Oosterhoff (in 1961) and Kenichi Fukui (in 1964) had discovered portions of the orbital symmetry rules before Woodward and Hoffmann. Why not organic chemists? Indeed, perhaps the greatest motivation to discover the mechanism of a mysterious reaction is to uncover key examples of that mysterious reaction in your very own laboratory. The stories of 20 chemists and R. B. Woodward are discussed in this paper which is Paper 6 in a 27‐paper series on the history of Woodward‐Hoffmann rules. Social, political, and scientific explanations will also be presented as partial explanations as to why none of these individuals – except Woodward with Hoffmann – solved the pericyclic no‐mechanism problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Chemical Record\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Chemical Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202200065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chemical Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202200065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这是一个合理的问题,为什么在1965年Woodward - Hoffmann的五次通讯出现时,没有其他有机化学家发现周环反应的轨道对称规则?两位理论化学家——Luitzen Oosterhoff(1961年)和Kenichi Fukui(1964年)在Woodward和Hoffmann之前发现了部分轨道对称规则。为什么不是有机化学家?事实上,也许发现神秘反应机制的最大动机是在你自己的实验室里发现那个神秘反应的关键例子。20位化学家和r。B。本文是关于Woodward - Hoffmann规则历史的27篇系列论文中的第6篇。社会、政治和科学解释也将作为部分解释,来解释为什么除了Woodward和Hoffmann之外,这些人都没有解决周循环无机制问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Many Chemists Who Could Have Proposed the Woodward‐Hoffmann Rules But Didn't: The Organic Chemists Who Discovered the Smoking Guns[] **
It is a reasonable question to ask, why, as of 1965 when the five Woodward‐Hoffmann communications appeared, did no other organic chemist discover the orbital symmetry rules for pericyclic reactions? Two theoretical chemists – Luitzen Oosterhoff (in 1961) and Kenichi Fukui (in 1964) had discovered portions of the orbital symmetry rules before Woodward and Hoffmann. Why not organic chemists? Indeed, perhaps the greatest motivation to discover the mechanism of a mysterious reaction is to uncover key examples of that mysterious reaction in your very own laboratory. The stories of 20 chemists and R. B. Woodward are discussed in this paper which is Paper 6 in a 27‐paper series on the history of Woodward‐Hoffmann rules. Social, political, and scientific explanations will also be presented as partial explanations as to why none of these individuals – except Woodward with Hoffmann – solved the pericyclic no‐mechanism problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cover Picture: High Performance and Long‐cycle Life Rechargeable Aluminum Ion Battery: Recent Progress, Perspectives and Challenges (Chem. Rec. 12/2022) Cover Picture: Recent Advances in Synthesis of Multiply Arylated/Alkylated Pyridines (Chem. Rec. 9/2022) Recent Progress in the Selective Fluorinations of Some Functionalized Cycloalkenes Porous Organic Polymers: Promising Testbed for Heterogeneous Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Photocatalysis and Nonredox CO2 Fixation The Perfect Imperfections in Electrocatalysts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1