17世纪英国的鸣禽与社会区分

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Renaissance Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-18 DOI:10.1111/rest.12845
D. Frost
{"title":"17世纪英国的鸣禽与社会区分","authors":"D. Frost","doi":"10.1111/rest.12845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the nuanced relationship between songbirds and social dynamics in early modern England. It demonstrates how a rhetorical discourse of social distinction was created by printed bird‐training manuals. This discourse was necessary because the same species of songbird existed across the social spectrum. For native songbirds, therefore, their inherent value, and the status they conferred upon their owners, was determined more by their skill and training than by their particular species. Printed manuals explained how songbirds could be raised to surpass the limitations of nature through learning the song of another species, learning musical phrases and by being taught to sing in the winter rather than the summer. Analysing printed literature, probate inventories and household accounts, this article demonstrates that the practice of songbird‐keeping was widely affordable. This can then be contrasted to the ‘gentlemanly’ model of bird‐keeping outlined by printed manuals, which emphasise the need for investment into the birds to cause them to surpass the limitations of nature. The authority of this ‘gentlemanly’ model was used to cast judgment upon those who did not follow the manuals' guidance, highlighting the fact that a songbird's true value lay in its abilities rather than its species.","PeriodicalId":45351,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Songbirds and Social Distinction in Seventeenth‐Century England\",\"authors\":\"D. Frost\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rest.12845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates the nuanced relationship between songbirds and social dynamics in early modern England. It demonstrates how a rhetorical discourse of social distinction was created by printed bird‐training manuals. This discourse was necessary because the same species of songbird existed across the social spectrum. For native songbirds, therefore, their inherent value, and the status they conferred upon their owners, was determined more by their skill and training than by their particular species. Printed manuals explained how songbirds could be raised to surpass the limitations of nature through learning the song of another species, learning musical phrases and by being taught to sing in the winter rather than the summer. Analysing printed literature, probate inventories and household accounts, this article demonstrates that the practice of songbird‐keeping was widely affordable. This can then be contrasted to the ‘gentlemanly’ model of bird‐keeping outlined by printed manuals, which emphasise the need for investment into the birds to cause them to surpass the limitations of nature. The authority of this ‘gentlemanly’ model was used to cast judgment upon those who did not follow the manuals' guidance, highlighting the fact that a songbird's true value lay in its abilities rather than its species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12845\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12845","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了近代早期英国鸣禽与社会动态之间的微妙关系。它展示了如何通过印刷的鸟类训练手册创建社会区别的修辞话语。这种讨论是必要的,因为同一种鸣禽存在于整个社会范围。因此,对于本土鸣禽来说,它们的内在价值,以及它们赋予主人的地位,更多地是由它们的技能和训练决定的,而不是由它们的特定物种决定的。印刷的手册解释了如何通过学习其他物种的歌声、学习乐句以及教鸣禽在冬天而不是夏天唱歌来培养鸣禽,从而超越自然的限制。本文分析了印刷文献、遗嘱认证清单和家庭账户,证明了饲养鸣禽的做法是广泛负担得起的。这可以与印刷手册中概述的“绅士”养鸟模式形成对比,后者强调需要对鸟类进行投资,以使它们超越自然的限制。这种“绅士”模式的权威被用来评判那些不遵守手册指导的人,强调了一个事实,即鸣禽的真正价值在于它的能力,而不是它的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Songbirds and Social Distinction in Seventeenth‐Century England
This article investigates the nuanced relationship between songbirds and social dynamics in early modern England. It demonstrates how a rhetorical discourse of social distinction was created by printed bird‐training manuals. This discourse was necessary because the same species of songbird existed across the social spectrum. For native songbirds, therefore, their inherent value, and the status they conferred upon their owners, was determined more by their skill and training than by their particular species. Printed manuals explained how songbirds could be raised to surpass the limitations of nature through learning the song of another species, learning musical phrases and by being taught to sing in the winter rather than the summer. Analysing printed literature, probate inventories and household accounts, this article demonstrates that the practice of songbird‐keeping was widely affordable. This can then be contrasted to the ‘gentlemanly’ model of bird‐keeping outlined by printed manuals, which emphasise the need for investment into the birds to cause them to surpass the limitations of nature. The authority of this ‘gentlemanly’ model was used to cast judgment upon those who did not follow the manuals' guidance, highlighting the fact that a songbird's true value lay in its abilities rather than its species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Studies
Renaissance Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Renaissance Studies is a multi-disciplinary journal which publishes articles and editions of documents on all aspects of Renaissance history and culture. The articles range over the history, art, architecture, religion, literature, and languages of Europe during the period.
期刊最新文献
From Michelangelo to Callot: The Art of Mannerist Printmaking (National Gallery in Prague organised in collaboration with the Musée du Louvre, held at Waldstein Riding School, 17 May–11 August 2024). Catalogue by BlankaKubíková and AlenaVolrábová, eds. From Michelangelo to Callot: The Art of Mannerist Printmaking, exh. cat., trans. Jennifer Hejtmánková, Holly Hibbert, and Veronika Lopaurová. Prague: National Gallery, 2024. 421 pp. col. ill. ISBN 978‐80‐7035‐825‐2. ‘And so Beautifully Illuminated’: Hand‐coloured Luther Bibles from the Sixteenth Century☆ L'Invention de la Renaissance. L'Humaniste, Le Prince et L'Artiste. Bibliothèque nationale de France, site Richelieu, galeries Mansart and Pigott, 20 February–16 June 2024. Jean‐MarcChatelain and GennaroToscano, eds., L'Invention de la Renaissance. L'Humaniste, Le Prince et L'Artiste. Paris: BnF, 2024. 264 pp, ill. in full colour. €49. Commemorating festive performances in popular print in sixteenth‐century Italy☆ ToddBorlik, Shakespeare Beyond the Green World: Drama and Ecopolitics in Jacobean Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. 304 pp. £85.00/$105.00. ISBN: 9780192866639.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1