智力残疾妇女药物滥用治疗使用的差异

E. Slayter
{"title":"智力残疾妇女药物滥用治疗使用的差异","authors":"E. Slayter","doi":"10.1080/1536710X.2016.1162120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite concerns about health disparities among women with intellectual disabilities, little is known about substance abuse treatment access in this population. Using standardized performance measures, treatment initiation and engagement were examined retrospectively for women aged 18 to 64 (N = 3,752), men with (N = 5,732) and women without intellectual disability (N = 493,446). Logistic regression models of utilization were conducted. Women in the sample were less likely than men in the sample or women without intellectual disability to utilize treatment, suggesting both gender-related and disability-related barriers. Policy and practice implications for improving the health and welfare of women with intellectual disabilities are discussed.","PeriodicalId":87649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"115 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Substance Abuse Treatment Utilization Among Women with Intellectual Disability\",\"authors\":\"E. Slayter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1536710X.2016.1162120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite concerns about health disparities among women with intellectual disabilities, little is known about substance abuse treatment access in this population. Using standardized performance measures, treatment initiation and engagement were examined retrospectively for women aged 18 to 64 (N = 3,752), men with (N = 5,732) and women without intellectual disability (N = 493,446). Logistic regression models of utilization were conducted. Women in the sample were less likely than men in the sample or women without intellectual disability to utilize treatment, suggesting both gender-related and disability-related barriers. Policy and practice implications for improving the health and welfare of women with intellectual disabilities are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2016.1162120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2016.1162120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管人们关注智力残疾妇女的健康差异,但对这一人群中药物滥用治疗的可及性知之甚少。采用标准化的表现测量方法,回顾性检查了18至64岁女性(N = 3752)、男性(N = 5732)和无智力残疾女性(N = 493446)的治疗开始和参与情况。利用Logistic回归模型。样本中的女性比样本中的男性或没有智力残疾的女性更不可能利用治疗,这表明与性别和残疾有关的障碍。讨论了改善智障妇女健康和福利的政策和实践影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in Substance Abuse Treatment Utilization Among Women with Intellectual Disability
ABSTRACT Despite concerns about health disparities among women with intellectual disabilities, little is known about substance abuse treatment access in this population. Using standardized performance measures, treatment initiation and engagement were examined retrospectively for women aged 18 to 64 (N = 3,752), men with (N = 5,732) and women without intellectual disability (N = 493,446). Logistic regression models of utilization were conducted. Women in the sample were less likely than men in the sample or women without intellectual disability to utilize treatment, suggesting both gender-related and disability-related barriers. Policy and practice implications for improving the health and welfare of women with intellectual disabilities are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board EOV Notes on Contributors Religion Education as Calling. Deaf Families' Unique Experiences and Obstacles. You're Deaf? Breaking through Myths for Effective Therapeutic Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1