感知信任:它的所有维度对保险纳入都有影响吗?

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Insurance Markets and Companies Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI:10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.09
Archillies Kiwanuka, Athenia Bongani Sibindi
{"title":"感知信任:它的所有维度对保险纳入都有影响吗?","authors":"Archillies Kiwanuka, Athenia Bongani Sibindi","doi":"10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to examine the significance of perceived trust dimensions in explaining insurance inclusion in Uganda. Insurance inclusion remained very low in Uganda. Although trust is vital for insurance inclusion, it is not known whether all of its dimensions are relevant for insurance inclusion. As such, hierarchical regression analysis was adopted to investigate the predictive power of the individual dimensions of perceived trust on insurance inclusion. The significance of the individual components was attained by determining the change in the adjusted R2 and the significance of the change. Hence, the results showed that integrity (β = 0.316, p < 0.01), credibility (β = 0.252, p < 0.01) and reliability (β = 0.211, p < 0.01) were significant positive predictors of insurance inclusion. However, the results showed benevolence (β = 0.018, p > 0.05) to have an insignificant positive influence on insurance inclusion in Uganda. The effect of benevolence on insurance inclusion was practically and statistically insignificant. Overall results showed that independent variables explained 50.6% of the variance in insurance inclusion in Uganda when combined. Unlike prior studies that have investigated the general effect of trust as the global variable, the current study examined the impact of the independent dimensions of trust in explaining insurance inclusion. Besides, earlier studies ignored the trust theory, which provides key dimensions for understanding trust. The current study reveals that not all dimensions of perceived trust are significant for insurance inclusion in Uganda.","PeriodicalId":32827,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Markets and Companies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived trust: Do all of its dimensions matter for insurance inclusion?\",\"authors\":\"Archillies Kiwanuka, Athenia Bongani Sibindi\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to examine the significance of perceived trust dimensions in explaining insurance inclusion in Uganda. Insurance inclusion remained very low in Uganda. Although trust is vital for insurance inclusion, it is not known whether all of its dimensions are relevant for insurance inclusion. As such, hierarchical regression analysis was adopted to investigate the predictive power of the individual dimensions of perceived trust on insurance inclusion. The significance of the individual components was attained by determining the change in the adjusted R2 and the significance of the change. Hence, the results showed that integrity (β = 0.316, p < 0.01), credibility (β = 0.252, p < 0.01) and reliability (β = 0.211, p < 0.01) were significant positive predictors of insurance inclusion. However, the results showed benevolence (β = 0.018, p > 0.05) to have an insignificant positive influence on insurance inclusion in Uganda. The effect of benevolence on insurance inclusion was practically and statistically insignificant. Overall results showed that independent variables explained 50.6% of the variance in insurance inclusion in Uganda when combined. Unlike prior studies that have investigated the general effect of trust as the global variable, the current study examined the impact of the independent dimensions of trust in explaining insurance inclusion. Besides, earlier studies ignored the trust theory, which provides key dimensions for understanding trust. The current study reveals that not all dimensions of perceived trust are significant for insurance inclusion in Uganda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance Markets and Companies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance Markets and Companies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Markets and Companies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.13(1).2022.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在研究感知信任维度在解释乌干达保险纳入方面的重要性。乌干达的保险覆盖率仍然很低。尽管信任对保险纳入至关重要,但尚不清楚其所有维度是否都与保险纳入相关。因此,本研究采用层次回归分析,探讨个体维度感知信任对保险包容性的预测能力。通过确定调整后R2的变化和变化的显著性来获得各成分的显著性。因此,结果表明完整性(β = 0.316, p <0.01),可信度(β = 0.252, p <0.01)和信度(β = 0.211, p <0.01)是保险纳入的显著正预测因子。然而,结果显示仁慈(β = 0.018, p >0.05)对乌干达的保险纳入有不显著的正向影响。仁慈对保险纳入的影响在实践和统计上都不显著。总体结果表明,当合并时,自变量解释了乌干达保险纳入差异的50.6%。与之前的研究不同,信任作为全局变量的一般效应,本研究考察了信任在解释保险纳入方面的独立维度的影响。此外,早期的研究忽略了信任理论,而信任理论是理解信任的关键维度。目前的研究表明,并非感知信任的所有维度都对乌干达的保险纳入具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived trust: Do all of its dimensions matter for insurance inclusion?
The study aimed to examine the significance of perceived trust dimensions in explaining insurance inclusion in Uganda. Insurance inclusion remained very low in Uganda. Although trust is vital for insurance inclusion, it is not known whether all of its dimensions are relevant for insurance inclusion. As such, hierarchical regression analysis was adopted to investigate the predictive power of the individual dimensions of perceived trust on insurance inclusion. The significance of the individual components was attained by determining the change in the adjusted R2 and the significance of the change. Hence, the results showed that integrity (β = 0.316, p < 0.01), credibility (β = 0.252, p < 0.01) and reliability (β = 0.211, p < 0.01) were significant positive predictors of insurance inclusion. However, the results showed benevolence (β = 0.018, p > 0.05) to have an insignificant positive influence on insurance inclusion in Uganda. The effect of benevolence on insurance inclusion was practically and statistically insignificant. Overall results showed that independent variables explained 50.6% of the variance in insurance inclusion in Uganda when combined. Unlike prior studies that have investigated the general effect of trust as the global variable, the current study examined the impact of the independent dimensions of trust in explaining insurance inclusion. Besides, earlier studies ignored the trust theory, which provides key dimensions for understanding trust. The current study reveals that not all dimensions of perceived trust are significant for insurance inclusion in Uganda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Markets and Companies
Insurance Markets and Companies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency assessment and trends in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis of DEA application Competitive positioning and market share of selected insurance companies: case of Nigeria Leadership in the digital era: Exploring the nexus between leadership styles and job satisfaction. The mediating role of perceived organizational politics in Jordanian insurance companies Contribution of the non-life insurance sector to the economic growth of Nepal: Analysis from the EGLS approach The use of blockchain in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1