某河流生态系统污染的关键修复方法综述

Chalachew Yenew
{"title":"某河流生态系统污染的关键修复方法综述","authors":"Chalachew Yenew","doi":"10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: River is one of a freshwater ecosystem that plays an important role in people's living, aquatic and terrestrial living organisms, and agricultural production. Compared to other ecosystems, rivers support a disproportionately large number of plant and animal species. However, excessive human activities have busted the original ecological balance by polluting the river ecosystem. As a result, partial or total affected the structure and functions of the river ecosystem. This review aimed to investigate the major ecological restoration methods of the polluted river ecosystem. Methods: We have adopted the procedures from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The required data were collected via a literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EMBASE, HINARI, and Cochrane Library from the 9th of September, 2019 to the 5th of March, 2020 using combined terms. Articles were included in our review; only if it assessed empirically and comparison and contrast between two or more different restoration methods. This review; it is mainly included published research articles, national reports, and annual reports and excluded opinion essays. Results: Commonly used methods for restoration of polluted rivers around the globe could be categorized depending on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river. Restoration methods such as channel hydromorphic, aeration, watershed action, riparian, In-stream hydromorphic, and In-stream or wetland creation restoration account for 16%, 19%, 12%, 22%, 17% and 14% of river ecosystem restoration efficiency respectively. From the restoration methods: riparian, artificial aeration and In-stream or wetland creation are preferred for restoration of chemical characteristics. For the restoration of physical characteristics; watershed action and channel hydromorphic are preferred. While for the restoration of biological characteristics; in-stream hydromorphic is the preferred one. Conclusion: Contaminated Rivers can be restored by using different restoration methods. The selection of the preferred restoration methods depends on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river.","PeriodicalId":12868,"journal":{"name":"Health science journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Restoration Methods of a Polluted RiverEcosystem: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Chalachew Yenew\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: River is one of a freshwater ecosystem that plays an important role in people's living, aquatic and terrestrial living organisms, and agricultural production. Compared to other ecosystems, rivers support a disproportionately large number of plant and animal species. However, excessive human activities have busted the original ecological balance by polluting the river ecosystem. As a result, partial or total affected the structure and functions of the river ecosystem. This review aimed to investigate the major ecological restoration methods of the polluted river ecosystem. Methods: We have adopted the procedures from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The required data were collected via a literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EMBASE, HINARI, and Cochrane Library from the 9th of September, 2019 to the 5th of March, 2020 using combined terms. Articles were included in our review; only if it assessed empirically and comparison and contrast between two or more different restoration methods. This review; it is mainly included published research articles, national reports, and annual reports and excluded opinion essays. Results: Commonly used methods for restoration of polluted rivers around the globe could be categorized depending on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river. Restoration methods such as channel hydromorphic, aeration, watershed action, riparian, In-stream hydromorphic, and In-stream or wetland creation restoration account for 16%, 19%, 12%, 22%, 17% and 14% of river ecosystem restoration efficiency respectively. From the restoration methods: riparian, artificial aeration and In-stream or wetland creation are preferred for restoration of chemical characteristics. For the restoration of physical characteristics; watershed action and channel hydromorphic are preferred. While for the restoration of biological characteristics; in-stream hydromorphic is the preferred one. Conclusion: Contaminated Rivers can be restored by using different restoration methods. The selection of the preferred restoration methods depends on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health science journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health science journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:河流是一种淡水生态系统,在人类生活、水陆生物和农业生产中起着重要作用。与其他生态系统相比,河流支持着不成比例的大量动植物物种。然而,过度的人类活动破坏了原有的生态平衡,污染了河流生态系统。因此,部分或全部影响了河流生态系统的结构和功能。本文综述了受污染河流生态系统的主要生态修复方法。方法:我们采用了系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南中的程序。所需数据收集于2019年9月9日至2020年3月5日期间通过MEDLINE/PubMed、Google Scholar、Science Direct、EMBASE、HINARI和Cochrane Library的文献检索。文章被纳入我们的综述;只有经过经验评估和两种或两种以上不同修复方法的比较和对比。综述;主要包括已发表的研究论文、国家报告和年度报告,不包括观点文章。结果:根据河流的物理、化学和生物特性,可以对全球常用的污染河流修复方法进行分类。河道水形态、曝气、流域作用、河岸、流内水形态、流内或湿地创造等恢复方式分别占河流生态系统恢复效率的16%、19%、12%、22%、17%和14%。从恢复方法上看,河岸、人工曝气和河道内或湿地是恢复化学特性的首选方法。用于恢复物理特征;首选流域作用和河道水形态。而对于生物特性的恢复;流内水形态是首选的一种。结论:污染河流可采用不同的修复方法进行修复。首选修复方法的选择取决于河流的物理、化学和生物特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Key Restoration Methods of a Polluted RiverEcosystem: A Systematic Review
Background: River is one of a freshwater ecosystem that plays an important role in people's living, aquatic and terrestrial living organisms, and agricultural production. Compared to other ecosystems, rivers support a disproportionately large number of plant and animal species. However, excessive human activities have busted the original ecological balance by polluting the river ecosystem. As a result, partial or total affected the structure and functions of the river ecosystem. This review aimed to investigate the major ecological restoration methods of the polluted river ecosystem. Methods: We have adopted the procedures from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The required data were collected via a literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EMBASE, HINARI, and Cochrane Library from the 9th of September, 2019 to the 5th of March, 2020 using combined terms. Articles were included in our review; only if it assessed empirically and comparison and contrast between two or more different restoration methods. This review; it is mainly included published research articles, national reports, and annual reports and excluded opinion essays. Results: Commonly used methods for restoration of polluted rivers around the globe could be categorized depending on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river. Restoration methods such as channel hydromorphic, aeration, watershed action, riparian, In-stream hydromorphic, and In-stream or wetland creation restoration account for 16%, 19%, 12%, 22%, 17% and 14% of river ecosystem restoration efficiency respectively. From the restoration methods: riparian, artificial aeration and In-stream or wetland creation are preferred for restoration of chemical characteristics. For the restoration of physical characteristics; watershed action and channel hydromorphic are preferred. While for the restoration of biological characteristics; in-stream hydromorphic is the preferred one. Conclusion: Contaminated Rivers can be restored by using different restoration methods. The selection of the preferred restoration methods depends on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the river.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENCEGAHAN JATUH PADA BAYI KEJANG DEMAM DENGAN MASALAH KEPERAWATAN RISIKO JATUH DI RSU MUHAMMADIYAH PONOROGO STUDI KASUS : ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN PADA LANSIA DENGAN MASALAH KEPERAWATAN GANGGUAN DISTRESS SPIRITUAL DI UPT PANTI SOSIAL TRESNA WERDHA MAGETAN PENGARUH PERAWATAN PAYUDARA TERHADAP PENGELUARAN ASI PADA IBU POST PARTUM DI PMB NY. LILIS SULISTYOWATI, SST, KARANGAN, BALONG, PONOROGO LITERATURE REVIEW: EFEKTIVITAS SENAM LANSIA (TAI CHI) DALAM PENURUNAN TEKANAN DARAH PADA LANSIA DENGAN HIPERTENSI ASUHAN KEBIDANAN PADA BAYI DENGAN LABIOSCHISIS DI PMB MASFUFAH, S.Tr.Keb. PONOROGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1