生物陶瓷封口剂的细菌泄漏评估

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI:10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23
H. Monardes, Marcia Antúnez, P. Herrera, Pablo Jara, K. Steinfort, J. Abarca
{"title":"生物陶瓷封口剂的细菌泄漏评估","authors":"H. Monardes, Marcia Antúnez, P. Herrera, Pablo Jara, K. Steinfort, J. Abarca","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess the bacterial leakage of two bioceramic sealers and compare them to an epoxy resin-based sealer. \nMethodology: A sample of 94 one-rooted premolars was obtained and separated into three experimental groups of 30 teeth; two samples were used for negative controls and two for positive controls. The experimental groups were obturated using the hydraulic compaction technique: Group 1, AH Plus® sealer, Group 2, Bioroot® RCS and Group 3, TotalFill® BC Sealer. The teeth were mounted on bacterial leakage devices and incubated at 37 °C for 30 days in a bilin esculin agar culture with Enterococcus Faecalis. \nResults: Leakage occurred in 27 roots (30%) of the entire sample. Group 1 (AH® Plus) showed the highest percentage of leaked samples (40%) and also took the least average days to leak (16,9) compared to Bioroot® (19,7) and TotalFill® (19,5), but the differences found were not significant (p>0,05). \nConclusions: None of the sealers analyzed in this study produced an effective apical seal in which no bacterial leakage occurred. A third of the total sample presented leakage, but the differences between groups were not significant.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial leakage assessment of bioceramic sealers\",\"authors\":\"H. Monardes, Marcia Antúnez, P. Herrera, Pablo Jara, K. Steinfort, J. Abarca\",\"doi\":\"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To assess the bacterial leakage of two bioceramic sealers and compare them to an epoxy resin-based sealer. \\nMethodology: A sample of 94 one-rooted premolars was obtained and separated into three experimental groups of 30 teeth; two samples were used for negative controls and two for positive controls. The experimental groups were obturated using the hydraulic compaction technique: Group 1, AH Plus® sealer, Group 2, Bioroot® RCS and Group 3, TotalFill® BC Sealer. The teeth were mounted on bacterial leakage devices and incubated at 37 °C for 30 days in a bilin esculin agar culture with Enterococcus Faecalis. \\nResults: Leakage occurred in 27 roots (30%) of the entire sample. Group 1 (AH® Plus) showed the highest percentage of leaked samples (40%) and also took the least average days to leak (16,9) compared to Bioroot® (19,7) and TotalFill® (19,5), but the differences found were not significant (p>0,05). \\nConclusions: None of the sealers analyzed in this study produced an effective apical seal in which no bacterial leakage occurred. A third of the total sample presented leakage, but the differences between groups were not significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价两种生物陶瓷封口剂的细菌渗漏情况,并与环氧树脂封口剂进行比较。方法:选取94颗单根前磨牙,分为3组,每组30颗;阴性对照两份,阳性对照两份。实验组采用水力压实技术进行封闭:第1组,AH Plus®密封剂,第2组,Bioroot®RCS,第3组,TotalFill®BC密封剂。将牙齿安装在细菌渗漏装置上,在粪肠球菌(Enterococcus Faecalis)的十亿蛋白琼脂培养基中于37℃孵育30天。结果:27根(30%)发生龋漏。与Bioroot®(19.7)和TotalFill®(19.5)相比,1组(AH®Plus)泄漏样品的百分比最高(40%),平均泄漏时间最短(16.9),但差异不显著(p> 0.05)。结论:在本研究中分析的封口器中没有一个产生有效的根尖封口器,其中没有细菌泄漏发生。总样本的三分之一出现泄漏,但组间差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacterial leakage assessment of bioceramic sealers
Aim: To assess the bacterial leakage of two bioceramic sealers and compare them to an epoxy resin-based sealer. Methodology: A sample of 94 one-rooted premolars was obtained and separated into three experimental groups of 30 teeth; two samples were used for negative controls and two for positive controls. The experimental groups were obturated using the hydraulic compaction technique: Group 1, AH Plus® sealer, Group 2, Bioroot® RCS and Group 3, TotalFill® BC Sealer. The teeth were mounted on bacterial leakage devices and incubated at 37 °C for 30 days in a bilin esculin agar culture with Enterococcus Faecalis. Results: Leakage occurred in 27 roots (30%) of the entire sample. Group 1 (AH® Plus) showed the highest percentage of leaked samples (40%) and also took the least average days to leak (16,9) compared to Bioroot® (19,7) and TotalFill® (19,5), but the differences found were not significant (p>0,05). Conclusions: None of the sealers analyzed in this study produced an effective apical seal in which no bacterial leakage occurred. A third of the total sample presented leakage, but the differences between groups were not significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of Depotphoresis and diode laser for reduction of microbial load and postoperative pain, and healing of periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial Endodontics: clinical protocols on scientific basis Anatomical proximity of upper teeth and local factors associated with the thickness of the maxillary sinus membrane: a retrospective study A contemporary approach to treat necrotic immature teeth using different bioceramic materials Endodontic guides and ultrasonic tips for management of calcifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1